Franchise Group, Inc.
Franchise Group, Inc. FRGAP Peers
See (FRGAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRGAP | $25.15 | N/A | 0 | 2.93 | $8.59 | N/A |
| AMZN | $213.57 | +2.72% | 2.3T | 34.84 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $119.38 | -0.49% | 287.7B | 13.16 | $9.07 | N/A |
| PDD | $100.62 | +1.30% | 142.8B | 10.82 | $9.30 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,482.39 | -3.85% | 125.9B | 61.14 | $40.60 | N/A |
| SE | $165.65 | -2.79% | 98.1B | 115.84 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,377.72 | +0.43% | 78.5B | 33.72 | $40.86 | N/A |
| CVNA | $341.28 | -0.59% | 73.1B | 119.33 | $2.86 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,717.96 | -0.20% | 62.2B | 25.18 | $147.67 | N/A |
| CPNG | $28.46 | -0.30% | 51.6B | 203.25 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRGAP vs AMZN Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while AMZN trades at $213.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BABA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 287.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BABA trades at $119.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs PDD Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while PDD trades at $100.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs MELI Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while MELI trades at $2,482.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 61.14. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs SE Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while SE trades at $165.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 115.84. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ORLY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ORLY trades at $1,377.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CVNA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CVNA trades at $341.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 119.33. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs AZO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while AZO trades at $3,717.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CPNG Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CPNG trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 203.25. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs JD Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while JD trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs VIPS Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while VIPS trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs EBAY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while EBAY trades at $78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs TSCO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while TSCO trades at $50.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ULTA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ULTA trades at $465.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CHWY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CHWY trades at $48.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs WSM Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while WSM trades at $157.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs GPC Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while GPC trades at $125.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CASY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CASY trades at $443.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BBY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BBY trades at $73.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs DKS Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while DKS trades at $180.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs GME Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while GME trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 89.64. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CART Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CART trades at $45.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs MUSA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while MUSA trades at $425.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs FIVE Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while FIVE trades at $127.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ETSY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ETSY trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs GLBE Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while GLBE trades at $34.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -93.49. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs W Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while W trades at $45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas W's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BBWI Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BBWI trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs RH Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while RH trades at $183.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs AAP Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while AAP trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ASO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ASO trades at $43.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs OZON Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs EYE Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while EYE trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -65.72. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs SVV Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while SVV trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.68. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs RVLV Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while RVLV trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs WINA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while WINA trades at $432.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs MNSO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while MNSO trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs TA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs EVGO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while EVGO trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs EVGOW Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while EVGOW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs TANNI Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs TDUP Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 912.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while TDUP trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs OLPX Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while OLPX trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs SBH Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 869.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while SBH trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs HEPS Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while HEPS trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs RERE Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 826M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while RERE trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs LQDT Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 775.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while LQDT trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs WOOF Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 769.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while WOOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs OSTK Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BBW Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BBW trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs YSG Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 569M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while YSG trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs HNST Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 568.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while HNST trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -258.00. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ODP Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ODP trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ARKO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ARKO trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 145.33. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs HZO Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 482.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while HZO trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BNED Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BNED trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BYON Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BYON trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CHPT Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CHPT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs FLWS Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while FLWS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BWMX Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 298.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BWMX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.11. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs FTCH Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs LE Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while LE trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 61.46. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs QRTEA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs JMIA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while JMIA trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs NEGG Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while NEGG trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs LOGC Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while LOGC trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BZUN Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BZUN trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BARK-WT Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BARK-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BARK Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BARK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs WBUY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while WBUY trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs VLTA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs AKA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 145.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while AKA trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs DADA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 130.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while DADA trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs QRTEP Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs GOED Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs OCG Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while OCG trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs SPWH Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while SPWH trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs APRN Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs DIBS Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while DIBS trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs QVCGB Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while QVCGB trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs QVCGP Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while QVCGP trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs GRWG Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while GRWG trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs NHTC Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while NHTC trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 119.88. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs PRTS Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while PRTS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs QRTEB Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CTIB Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs HOUR Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while HOUR trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 124.40. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BBBY Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs SSU Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs KIRK Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while KIRK trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BGFV Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BGFV trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs TLF Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while TLF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs QVCGA Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while QVCGA trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs JBDI Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while JBDI trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs IPW Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while IPW trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs CGTL Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while CGTL trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs BOXD Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ZKH Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ZKH trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.
FRGAP vs ZOOZ Comparison
FRGAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRGAP stands at 0. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRGAP is priced at $25.15, while ZOOZ trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRGAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.93, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FRGAP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRGAP is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRGAP.