Fritzy Tech Inc.
Fritzy Tech Inc. FRFRD Peers
See (FRFRD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRFRD | $2.42 | +14.69% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TCTZF | $63.01 | +0.00% | 601.1B | 23.20 | $2.85 | +0.87% |
| TCEHY | $63.79 | +0.00% | 580.3B | 22.31 | $2.85 | +0.91% |
| PROSY | $10.93 | +0.28% | 123.5B | 10.62 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $55.25 | -0.81% | 120.8B | 10.71 | $5.16 | +0.20% |
| NPSNY | $61.63 | +0.00% | 50B | 10.24 | $6.02 | +0.15% |
| NAPRF | $306.70 | +0.00% | 49.7B | 10.19 | $30.09 | +0.21% |
| KUASF | $8.12 | +14.93% | 35B | 16.92 | $0.48 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.51 | +0.00% | 32.9B | 15.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $10.66 | +0.09% | 29.9B | 8.46 | $1.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRFRD vs TCTZF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 601.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while TCTZF trades at $63.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs TCEHY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 580.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while TCEHY trades at $63.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs PROSY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while PROSY trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs PROSF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while PROSF trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs NPSNY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while NPSNY trades at $61.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs NAPRF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while NAPRF trades at $306.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and NAPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs KUASF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while KUASF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and KUASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs KSHTY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while KSHTY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and KSHTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs BAIDF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while BAIDF trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs YAHOF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RPGRY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RPGRY trades at $39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs RPGRF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and RPGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs NHNCF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and NHNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ADEVF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ADEVY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ATDRF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ATDRF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ATDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ATDRY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ATDRY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs CSXXY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while CSXXY trades at $45.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RTMVF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RTMVY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RTMVY trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs SKLTF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SKLTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs KKKUF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while KKKUF trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and KKKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs CHLLF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and CHLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs OOOOF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and OOOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs MEIUF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MEIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs HMNTY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while HMNTY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and HMNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs DHGAF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and DHGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs MLRYY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs XINXF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ADBMF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs WNWSF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and WNWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ZGXNF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ZGXNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs FRRGF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs VYGPF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and VYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs MECVF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs UUMMF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs OPNDF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and OPNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs TGRVF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs NXCLF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ZMDTF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ZMDTF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs CKPDY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and CKPDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RSTN Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs CPADF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and CPADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs MSEZ Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs BBUZ Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while BBUZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs PXSTF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and PXSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RDLYF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs SABOF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SABOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -35.44. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs PRSNF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs NIROF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and NIROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs BMTM Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and BMTM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs HYPPF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and HYPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs BBTVF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs EGLXF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs NUGL Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs SFUNY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SFUNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs CRTDW Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs YOOIF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while YOOIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs GIFX Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while GIFX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs LBUY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs MRNJ Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MRNJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs QQQFF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs MRPT Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MRPT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs GOGY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs LTCP Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs APMLF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 941.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs SPFYF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 636.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SPFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs CYAP Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs FMHS Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 591.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while FMHS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and FMHS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs QTTOY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 532.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while QTTOY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ILIM Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ILIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs VMSI Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RBDC Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and RBDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs DGTHF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and DGTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs LKST Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and LKST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs SEEK Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SEEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs KIWB Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and KIWB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ZONX Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ZONX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs OTTV Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs LHGI Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs SLNM Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SLNM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RWRDP Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and RWRDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs HUTN Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs DELCF Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and DELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs REDFY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs BTIM Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and BTIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs PIKL Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ISHM Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs SHGY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs MDAW Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs LOCM Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ROII Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs DATI Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and DATI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs LOVLQ Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs ZZLL Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFRD.
FRFRD vs FRFR Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and FRFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs INTH Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs ABBY Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and ABBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FRFRD vs RAIO Comparison
FRFRD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFRD stands at 0. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, FRFRD is priced at $2.42, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFRD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFRD's ROE is N/A, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFRD and RAIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).