Fritzy Tech Inc.
Fritzy Tech Inc. FRFR Peers
See (FRFR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRFR | $0.00 | +400.00% | 1.7K | N/A | -$0.17 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $64.02 | -0.93% | 582.5B | 22.38 | $2.86 | +0.91% |
| TCTZF | $63.49 | -2.32% | 578.3B | 22.36 | $2.84 | +0.91% |
| PROSF | $55.05 | N/A | 120.3B | 17.36 | $3.17 | +0.20% |
| PROSY | $10.60 | -1.12% | 119.6B | 16.83 | $0.63 | +0.21% |
| NAPRF | $305.19 | N/A | 50B | 16.59 | $18.40 | +0.22% |
| NPSNY | $58.64 | -1.61% | 48B | 15.93 | $3.68 | +0.16% |
| KUASF | $7.71 | N/A | 33.2B | 16.07 | $0.48 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.47 | +2.48% | 31.8B | 14.66 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $10.60 | +10.88% | 29.7B | 8.41 | $1.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRFR vs TCEHY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 582.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while TCEHY trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs TCTZF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 578.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while TCTZF trades at $63.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs PROSF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while PROSF trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs PROSY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while PROSY trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs NAPRF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while NAPRF trades at $305.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs NPSNY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while NPSNY trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs KUASF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while KUASF trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs KSHTY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while KSHTY trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs BAIDF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while BAIDF trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs YAHOF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while YAHOF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RPGRF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RPGRY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RPGRY trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs NHNCF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ADEVF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ADEVY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ATDRF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ATDRF trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ATDRY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ATDRY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs CSXXY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while CSXXY trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RTMVF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RTMVY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RTMVY trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SKLTF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SKLTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs KKKUF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while KKKUF trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs CHLLF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs OOOOF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MEIUF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs HMNTY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while HMNTY trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs DHGAF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MLRYY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs XINXF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ADBMF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs WNWSF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ZGXNF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs FRRGF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs VYGPF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MECVF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs UUMMF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs PXSTF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs OPNDF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs TGRVF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs NXCLF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs CKPDY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RSTN Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ZMDTF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ZMDTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs CPADF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs BBUZ Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while BBUZ trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MSEZ Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MSEZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RDLYF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SABOF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SABOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs PRSNF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs NIROF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs BMTM Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs HYPPF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs EGLXF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs BBTVF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs NUGL Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SFUNY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs GIFX Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while GIFX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs YOOIF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while YOOIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs CRTDW Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs LBUY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MRNJ Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs QQQFF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs GOGY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MRPT Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MRPT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs APMLF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 942.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs LTCP Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 890.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SPFYF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 636.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs CYAP Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ILIM Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs VMSI Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RBDC Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR and RBDC have similar daily volatility (196.04).
FRFR vs DGTHF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs FMHS Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 267.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while FMHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs LKST Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs KIWB Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ZONX Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs OTTV Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs LHGI Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs QTTOY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while QTTOY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SLNM Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR and SLNM have similar daily volatility (196.04).
FRFR vs HUTN Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs DELCF Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SEEK Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs REDFY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RWRDP Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs DATI Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs BTIM Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs PIKL Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ISHM Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs SHGY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs MDAW Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs LOCM Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ROII Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs LOVLQ Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ZZLL Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs INTH Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs ABBY Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs RAIO Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.
FRFR vs YITD Comparison
FRFR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRFR stands at 1.7K. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, FRFR is priced at $0.00, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRFR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFR is more volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFR.