Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 165.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PGR trades at $282.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 115.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while CB trades at $287.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 79.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while TKOMF trades at $42.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to TKOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 76.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while TKOMY trades at $39.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SMPNY has a market cap of 60.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SMPNY trades at $15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SMPNY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMPNY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to SMPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 60.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while TRV trades at $267.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ALL trades at $200.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ALL-PB trades at $25.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ALL-PH trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 45.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PPCCY trades at $48.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 39.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while IFCZF trades at $222.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 39.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to IFTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 38.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PPCCF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to PPCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FAXXF trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FRFXF trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FRFFF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 37.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PINXY trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to PINXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 37.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PINXF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MSADF has a market cap of 35.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MSADF trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MSADF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to MSADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 34.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MSADY trades at $22.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 28.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while WRB-PH trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 28.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while NHOLF trades at $30.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while WRB-PE trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 28.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while WRB-PF trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while WRB-PG trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while WRB trades at $72.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MKL trades at $1,868.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 22.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while CINF trades at $143.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 21.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while QBEIF trades at $14.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to QBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 20.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while QBIEY trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, INTAF has a market cap of 20.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while INTAF trades at $116.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas INTAF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to INTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to FRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while L trades at $86.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 16.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SNMYF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SNMCY trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 13.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AMIGY trades at $43.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 13.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AMIGF trades at $43.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while CNA trades at $48.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 12.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while IAUGY trades at $26.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to IAUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PZAKY trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFGC trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFGE trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFGD trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFG trades at $129.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFGB trades at $21.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while KNSL trades at $455.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PWZYF trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while IAUGF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AXS trades at $99.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AXS-PE trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while BZLYF trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while RLI trades at $74.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while THG trades at $168.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HCXLY trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to HCXLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SIGI trades at $85.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HCXLF trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to HCXLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ALL-PI trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while WTM trades at $1,784.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PLMR trades at $155.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while KMPR trades at $61.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while KMPB trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to IFZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while QUCOF trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to QUCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ZZHGF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while INFFF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to INFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MCY trades at $58.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFSIC trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFSIM trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFSIP trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFSIN trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFSIB has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFSIB trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFSIB's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFSIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFSIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFSIA trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ROOT trades at $143.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 84.98. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while LMND trades at $30.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SKWD trades at $54.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while STC trades at $65.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ZZHGY trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ZZHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HMN trades at $42.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HCI trades at $148.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while LNDAF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to LNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while BOW trades at $41.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MHLA trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while DIISY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIISY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while PRA trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SAFT trades at $77.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AHL-PD trades at $18.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -77.74. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AHL-PE trades at $18.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -77.70. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SIGIP trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ARGO trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 812.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HGTY trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 721.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while UVE trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 718.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while UFCS trades at $28.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while DGICA trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 697.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while DGICB trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 619.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HRTG trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 563.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ACIC trades at $11.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 412.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while GBLI trades at $28.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to FFHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 387.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while UIHC trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UIHC's ROE of -54.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 310.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FAXRF trades at $13.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 259.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while NODK trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 251.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while KINS trades at $18.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 233.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while CNFRZ trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to EGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 21.45M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FIGP trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIGP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while CNFR trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430224.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while UNAM trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 94379.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while HALL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6433.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SGYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to SGYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 1879.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to MAJCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1765.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 326.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.05. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18.00. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to FNHCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MILEW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MILEW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFHBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, NSEC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while NSEC trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AHL-PC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, Y comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while Y trades at $847.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, FNHC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while FNHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AHL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, STFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while STFC trades at $52.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, SBBG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while SBBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, AFHIQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.

FRFHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRFHF stands at 36.11B. In comparison, MILE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FRFHF is priced at $1,591.93, while MILE trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRFHF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FRFHF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRFHF is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRFHF.