Fresnillo plc
Fresnillo plc FRES.L Peers
See (FRES.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRES.L | £1,342.00 | +1.28% | 9.9B | 95.86 | £0.14 | +1.09% |
| POLY.L | £215.00 | +30.30% | 1B | -4.48 | -£0.48 | N/A |
| THS.L | £76.60 | +3.51% | 226.1M | 6.38 | £0.12 | +4.63% |
| SLP.L | £67.00 | +4.04% | 174.3M | 22.33 | £0.03 | +1.93% |
| EUA.L | £3.90 | -2.50% | 115.1M | -3.90 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| EEE.L | £14.10 | +3.30% | 97.2M | -14.10 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| GEM.L | £4.30 | +1.18% | 78.1M | -0.86 | -£0.05 | N/A |
| GMET.L | £52.50 | +2.94% | 72.9M | -52.50 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| PDL.L | £20.20 | N/A | 39.2M | -0.39 | -£0.52 | N/A |
| 0V7B.L | £0.41 | -10.00% | 32.8M | -4.01 | -£0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRES.L vs POLY.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while POLY.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRES.L has daily volatility of 2.47 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FRES.L vs THS.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while THS.L trades at £76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs SLP.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while SLP.L trades at £67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs EUA.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while EUA.L trades at £3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs EEE.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while EEE.L trades at £14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs GEM.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while GEM.L trades at £4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs GMET.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while GMET.L trades at £52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs PDL.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while PDL.L trades at £20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs 0V7B.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while 0V7B.L trades at £0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs HEX.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while HEX.L trades at £21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs 0V6Y.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while 0V6Y.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs 0A4V.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while 0A4V.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs COBR.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while COBR.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs GEMD.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while GEMD.L trades at £7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs UFO.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while UFO.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs FME.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while FME.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs ROCK.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while ROCK.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs URAH.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while URAH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs SEFA.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while SEFA.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs FMET.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while FMET.L trades at £4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs CMRS.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while CMRS.L trades at £1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs BOD.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while BOD.L trades at £0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs KDR.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 961.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while KDR.L trades at £0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs BRD.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while BRD.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FRES.L has daily volatility of 2.47 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FRES.L vs GEMR.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GEMR.L has a market cap of 571K. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while GEMR.L trades at £0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to GEMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs NTVO.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 509.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while NTVO.L trades at £0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs PERE.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while PERE.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs ALS.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ALS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while ALS.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs DNK.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DNK.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while DNK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs 0UH1.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, 0UH1.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while 0UH1.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.
FRES.L vs GPSS.L Comparison
FRES.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRES.L stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GPSS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRES.L is priced at £1,342.00, while GPSS.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRES.L currently has a P/E ratio of 95.86, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRES.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRES.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRES.L.