Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FRCOF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FRCOF
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd. (FRCOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRCOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRCOF | $399.43 | +3.50% | 1.2T | 45.03 | $8.87 | +0.75% |
| IDEXY | $14.56 | -1.69% | 181.4B | 25.10 | $0.58 | +4.27% |
| IDEXF | $57.75 | -1.33% | 180B | 24.89 | $2.32 | +3.03% |
| FRCOY | $40.91 | +1.64% | 125.5B | 45.97 | $0.89 | +0.74% |
| NXGPF | $187.76 | -0.00% | 21.6B | 20.79 | $9.03 | +4.33% |
| NXGPY | $87.06 | -0.91% | 20.3B | 17.62 | $4.94 | +4.51% |
| ATZAF | $81.97 | -1.74% | 8B | 38.85 | $2.11 | N/A |
| AMKYF | $20.86 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 17.67 | $1.18 | +2.22% |
| SHAOF | $21.49 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 17.61 | $1.22 | +3.99% |
| MRPZF | $11.10 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 12.91 | $0.86 | +4.74% |
Stock Comparison
FRCOF vs IDEXY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, IDEXY has a market cap of 181.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while IDEXY trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas IDEXY's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDEXY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to IDEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check IDEXY's competition here
FRCOF vs IDEXF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, IDEXF has a market cap of 180B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while IDEXF trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas IDEXF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDEXF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to IDEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check IDEXF's competition here
FRCOF vs FRCOY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, FRCOY has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while FRCOY trades at $40.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas FRCOY's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRCOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to FRCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check FRCOY's competition here
FRCOF vs NXGPF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NXGPF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while NXGPF trades at $187.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas NXGPF's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXGPF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to NXGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check NXGPF's competition here
FRCOF vs NXGPY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NXGPY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while NXGPY trades at $87.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas NXGPY's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXGPY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to NXGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check NXGPY's competition here
FRCOF vs ATZAF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ATZAF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while ATZAF trades at $81.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas ATZAF's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATZAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to ATZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check ATZAF's competition here
FRCOF vs AMKYF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AMKYF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while AMKYF trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas AMKYF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMKYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to AMKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check AMKYF's competition here
FRCOF vs SHAOF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SHAOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while SHAOF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas SHAOF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHAOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to SHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check SHAOF's competition here
FRCOF vs MRPZF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MRPZF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while MRPZF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas MRPZF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRPZF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to MRPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check MRPZF's competition here
FRCOF vs MRPLY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MRPLY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while MRPLY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas MRPLY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRPLY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to MRPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check MRPLY's competition here
FRCOF vs TPSRF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TPSRF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while TPSRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas TPSRF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPSRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to TPSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check TPSRF's competition here
FRCOF vs XTPEF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, XTPEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while XTPEF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas XTPEF's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XTPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to XTPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check XTPEF's competition here
FRCOF vs XTEPY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, XTEPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while XTEPY trades at $57.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas XTEPY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XTEPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to XTEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check XTEPY's competition here
FRCOF vs RTALF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RTALF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while RTALF trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas RTALF's P/E ratio is -105.76. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to RTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check RTALF's competition here
FRCOF vs BZTAF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, BZTAF has a market cap of 620.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while BZTAF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas BZTAF's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BZTAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to BZTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check BZTAF's competition here
FRCOF vs BOZTY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, BOZTY has a market cap of 600.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while BOZTY trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas BOZTY's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOZTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to BOZTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check BOZTY's competition here
FRCOF vs GRDZF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, GRDZF has a market cap of 299.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while GRDZF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas GRDZF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRDZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to GRDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check GRDZF's competition here
FRCOF vs SYHLF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SYHLF has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while SYHLF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas SYHLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to SYHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check SYHLF's competition here
FRCOF vs RROTF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RROTF has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while RROTF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas RROTF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RROTF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to RROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check RROTF's competition here
FRCOF vs ESHDF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ESHDF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while ESHDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas ESHDF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESHDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to ESHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check ESHDF's competition here
FRCOF vs RTMNF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RTMNF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while RTMNF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas RTMNF's P/E ratio is -151.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTMNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to RTMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check RTMNF's competition here
FRCOF vs GLFGF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, GLFGF has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while GLFGF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas GLFGF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLFGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to GLFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check GLFGF's competition here
FRCOF vs RTMAF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RTMAF has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while RTMAF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas RTMAF's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTMAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to RTMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check RTMAF's competition here
FRCOF vs ENMHF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ENMHF has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while ENMHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas ENMHF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENMHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to ENMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check ENMHF's competition here
FRCOF vs KMFG Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, KMFG has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while KMFG trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas KMFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to KMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check KMFG's competition here
FRCOF vs ESPGY Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ESPGY has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while ESPGY trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas ESPGY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESPGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to ESPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check ESPGY's competition here
FRCOF vs CCCHF Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CCCHF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while CCCHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas CCCHF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCCHF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to CCCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check CCCHF's competition here
FRCOF vs IVDN Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, IVDN has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while IVDN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas IVDN's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVDN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to IVDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check IVDN's competition here
FRCOF vs BEBE Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, BEBE has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while BEBE trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas BEBE's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BEBE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to BEBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check BEBE's competition here
FRCOF vs FBCD Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, FBCD has a market cap of 659.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while FBCD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas FBCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBCD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to FBCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check FBCD's competition here
FRCOF vs PRVU Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PRVU has a market cap of 44K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while PRVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas PRVU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRVU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to PRVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check PRVU's competition here
FRCOF vs ATAR Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ATAR has a market cap of 10.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while ATAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas ATAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATAR's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to ATAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check ATAR's competition here
FRCOF vs CBKCQ Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CBKCQ has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while CBKCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas CBKCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CBKCQ's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to CBKCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check CBKCQ's competition here
FRCOF vs CACH Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CACH has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while CACH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas CACH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CACH's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to CACH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check CACH's competition here
FRCOF vs DESTQ Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DESTQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while DESTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas DESTQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DESTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to DESTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check DESTQ's competition here
FRCOF vs EXPRQ Comparison April 2026
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 1.2T. In comparison, EXPRQ has a market cap of 749. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $399.43, while EXPRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.03, whereas EXPRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXPRQ's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to EXPRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.Check EXPRQ's competition here