Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd. FRCOF Peers
See (FRCOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRCOF | $349.00 | +10.79% | 96.6B | 34.31 | $9.18 | +1.00% |
| IDEXF | $51.91 | -0.00% | 163.5B | 24.31 | $2.16 | +3.47% |
| FRCOY | $33.47 | -2.11% | 100.3B | 35.54 | $0.92 | +0.50% |
| IDEXY | $12.98 | -0.54% | 81.7B | 12.15 | $1.08 | +4.58% |
| NXGPY | $86.08 | -1.17% | 20.1B | 21.00 | $4.10 | +1.61% |
| NXGPF | $166.80 | -0.93% | 19.5B | 20.34 | $8.20 | +1.65% |
| SHAOF | $70.51 | +6.03% | 5.2B | 18.08 | $3.90 | +0.94% |
| ATZAF | $51.77 | +2.72% | 4.9B | 39.82 | $1.30 | N/A |
| AMKYF | $18.91 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 18.36 | $1.03 | +2.51% |
| MRPLY | $12.45 | -0.04% | 3.2B | 0.17 | $76.92 | +3.19% |
Stock Comparison
FRCOF vs IDEXF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, IDEXF has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while IDEXF trades at $51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas IDEXF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDEXF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to IDEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs FRCOY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, FRCOY has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while FRCOY trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas FRCOY's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRCOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to FRCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs IDEXY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, IDEXY has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while IDEXY trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas IDEXY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDEXY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to IDEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs NXGPY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, NXGPY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while NXGPY trades at $86.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas NXGPY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NXGPY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to NXGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs NXGPF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, NXGPF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while NXGPF trades at $166.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas NXGPF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NXGPF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to NXGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs SHAOF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, SHAOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while SHAOF trades at $70.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas SHAOF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHAOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to SHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs ATZAF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, ATZAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while ATZAF trades at $51.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas ATZAF's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATZAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to ATZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs AMKYF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, AMKYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while AMKYF trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas AMKYF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMKYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to AMKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs MRPLY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, MRPLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while MRPLY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas MRPLY's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRPLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to MRPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs TPSRF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, TPSRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while TPSRF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas TPSRF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPSRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to TPSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs MRPZF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, MRPZF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while MRPZF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas MRPZF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRPZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to MRPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs XTEPY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, XTEPY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while XTEPY trades at $67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas XTEPY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XTEPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to XTEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs XTPEF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, XTPEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while XTPEF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas XTPEF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XTPEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to XTPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs RTALF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, RTALF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while RTALF trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas RTALF's P/E ratio is -105.76. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RTALF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to RTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs BZTAF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, BZTAF has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while BZTAF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas BZTAF's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BZTAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to BZTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs BOZTY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, BOZTY has a market cap of 555.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while BOZTY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas BOZTY's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOZTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to BOZTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs GRDZF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, GRDZF has a market cap of 392.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while GRDZF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas GRDZF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to GRDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs SYHLF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, SYHLF has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while SYHLF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas SYHLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to SYHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs RROTF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, RROTF has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while RROTF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas RROTF's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RROTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to RROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs ESHDF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, ESHDF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while ESHDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas ESHDF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESHDF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to ESHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs RTMAF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, RTMAF has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while RTMAF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas RTMAF's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RTMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to RTMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs RTMNF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, RTMNF has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while RTMNF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas RTMNF's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RTMNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to RTMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs GLFGF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, GLFGF has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while GLFGF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas GLFGF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLFGF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to GLFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs ENMHF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, ENMHF has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while ENMHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas ENMHF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENMHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to ENMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs ESPGY Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, ESPGY has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while ESPGY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas ESPGY's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESPGY's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to ESPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs CCCHF Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, CCCHF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while CCCHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas CCCHF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCCHF's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to CCCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs BEBE Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, BEBE has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while BEBE trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas BEBE's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BEBE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to BEBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs IVDN Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, IVDN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while IVDN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas IVDN's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IVDN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to IVDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs FBCD Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, FBCD has a market cap of 761.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while FBCD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas FBCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBCD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to FBCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs PRVU Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, PRVU has a market cap of 43.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while PRVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas PRVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRVU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to PRVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs ATAR Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, ATAR has a market cap of 10.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while ATAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas ATAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATAR's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to ATAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs CBKCQ Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, CBKCQ has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while CBKCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas CBKCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBKCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to CBKCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs CACH Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, CACH has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while CACH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas CACH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACH's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to CACH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs DESTQ Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, DESTQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while DESTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas DESTQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DESTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is more volatile compared to DESTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.
FRCOF vs EXPRQ Comparison
FRCOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRCOF stands at 96.6B. In comparison, EXPRQ has a market cap of 749. Regarding current trading prices, FRCOF is priced at $349.00, while EXPRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.31, whereas EXPRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRCOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXPRQ's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRCOF is less volatile compared to EXPRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRCOF.