First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FQVLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FQVLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQVLF | $16.95 | -0.59% | 14B | 67.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| ANFGF | $27.45 | +7.35% | 27.1B | 32.68 | $0.84 | +2.00% |
| JIAXF | $1.97 | +0.51% | 9.1B | 6.79 | $0.29 | +4.92% |
| LUNMF | $10.46 | +2.60% | 9B | 87.14 | $0.12 | +2.29% |
| KGHPF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 9.70 | $3.71 | N/A |
| OZMLF | $19.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
| MMLTF | $0.44 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 21.99 | $0.02 | N/A |
| CSCCF | $6.18 | +1.88% | 4.7B | 61.60 | $0.10 | N/A |
| AIAGY | $50.07 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 5.43 | $9.22 | +1.64% |
| AIAGF | $87.20 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 4.73 | $18.43 | +1.88% |
Stock Comparison
FQVLF vs ANFGF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ANFGF trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ANFGF's competition here
FQVLF vs JIAXF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while JIAXF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check JIAXF's competition here
FQVLF vs LUNMF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while LUNMF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 87.14. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check LUNMF's competition here
FQVLF vs KGHPF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while KGHPF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check KGHPF's competition here
FQVLF vs OZMLF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check OZMLF's competition here
FQVLF vs MMLTF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while MMLTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check MMLTF's competition here
FQVLF vs CSCCF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CSCCF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CSCCF's competition here
FQVLF vs AIAGY Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while AIAGY trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check AIAGY's competition here
FQVLF vs AIAGF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while AIAGF trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check AIAGF's competition here
FQVLF vs SFRRF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while SFRRF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check SFRRF's competition here
FQVLF vs IPMLF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 464.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while IPMLF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check IPMLF's competition here
FQVLF vs CAMLF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 357.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CAMLF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CAMLF's competition here
FQVLF vs ASCUF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ASCUF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ASCUF's competition here
FQVLF vs ARREF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 255.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ARREF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ARREF's competition here
FQVLF vs CPPKF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CPPKF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CPPKF's competition here
FQVLF vs AMRZF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check AMRZF's competition here
FQVLF vs LSANF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while LSANF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check LSANF's competition here
FQVLF vs HLGVF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check HLGVF's competition here
FQVLF vs CPFXF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CPFXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CPFXF's competition here
FQVLF vs HDRSF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while HDRSF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check HDRSF's competition here
FQVLF vs HHLKF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while HHLKF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check HHLKF's competition here
FQVLF vs ATCUF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ATCUF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ATCUF's competition here
FQVLF vs EMTRF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while EMTRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check EMTRF's competition here
FQVLF vs CPORF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CPORF's competition here
FQVLF vs CCOXF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CCOXF's competition here
FQVLF vs NEVDF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check NEVDF's competition here
FQVLF vs CPPMF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CPPMF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CPPMF's competition here
FQVLF vs DRCMF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check DRCMF's competition here
FQVLF vs BZDLF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while BZDLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check BZDLF's competition here
FQVLF vs QCCUF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while QCCUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check QCCUF's competition here
FQVLF vs RKCLF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check RKCLF's competition here
FQVLF vs USCUF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while USCUF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check USCUF's competition here
FQVLF vs ACMDY Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ACMDY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ACMDY's competition here
FQVLF vs PNTZF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while PNTZF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check PNTZF's competition here
FQVLF vs AGLAF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check AGLAF's competition here
FQVLF vs SLMFF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while SLMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check SLMFF's competition here
FQVLF vs CPCPF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CPCPF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CPCPF's competition here
FQVLF vs BCUFF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while BCUFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check BCUFF's competition here
FQVLF vs WCUFF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check WCUFF's competition here
FQVLF vs ANGUF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ANGUF's competition here
FQVLF vs CAEN Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CAEN trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAEN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CAEN's competition here
FQVLF vs FVVSF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check FVVSF's competition here
FQVLF vs BRVRF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check BRVRF's competition here
FQVLF vs INUMF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 859K. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while INUMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to INUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check INUMF's competition here
FQVLF vs JUBAF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is less volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check JUBAF's competition here
FQVLF vs ECMXF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check ECMXF's competition here
FQVLF vs AEOMF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, AEOMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to AEOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check AEOMF's competition here
FQVLF vs CROJF Comparison August 2025
FQVLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQVLF stands at 14B. In comparison, CROJF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FQVLF is priced at $16.95, while CROJF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQVLF currently has a P/E ratio of 67.80, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, FQVLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FQVLF is more volatile compared to CROJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQVLF.Check CROJF's competition here