Frequentis AG
Frequentis AG (FQT.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FQT.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQT.DE | €77.20 | +6.63% | 1B | 50.67 | €1.50 | +0.35% |
| CIS.DE | €68.36 | +2.87% | 268.8B | 28.12 | €2.42 | +2.08% |
| MTLA.DE | €380.30 | +1.20% | 62.1B | 33.83 | €11.09 | +1.05% |
| CIE1.DE | €386.45 | +13.63% | 50.8B | 264.08 | €1.36 | N/A |
| NOA3.DE | €7.37 | +8.48% | 40B | 65.15 | €0.11 | +1.85% |
| ERCB.DE | €9.94 | +3.41% | 33.1B | 12.71 | €0.78 | +2.67% |
| ERCG.DE | €9.81 | +1.24% | 33.1B | 12.72 | €0.78 | +2.67% |
| 2HP.DE | €21.36 | +8.29% | 28B | -138.57 | -€0.15 | +2.24% |
| JNP.DE | €34.69 | -0.77% | 11.4B | 34.01 | €1.02 | +0.55% |
| ADV.DE | €22.70 | -0.44% | 1.2B | -13.29 | -€1.70 | +2.30% |
Stock Comparison
FQT.DE vs CIS.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, CIS.DE has a market cap of 268.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while CIS.DE trades at €68.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas CIS.DE's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIS.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to CIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check CIS.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs MTLA.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, MTLA.DE has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while MTLA.DE trades at €380.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas MTLA.DE's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTLA.DE's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to MTLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check MTLA.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs CIE1.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, CIE1.DE has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while CIE1.DE trades at €386.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas CIE1.DE's P/E ratio is 264.08. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIE1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is less volatile compared to CIE1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check CIE1.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs NOA3.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, NOA3.DE has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while NOA3.DE trades at €7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas NOA3.DE's P/E ratio is 65.15. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOA3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to NOA3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check NOA3.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs ERCB.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ERCB.DE has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while ERCB.DE trades at €9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas ERCB.DE's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERCB.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to ERCB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check ERCB.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs ERCG.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ERCG.DE has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while ERCG.DE trades at €9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas ERCG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERCG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to ERCG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check ERCG.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs 2HP.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, 2HP.DE has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while 2HP.DE trades at €21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas 2HP.DE's P/E ratio is -138.57. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2HP.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to 2HP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check 2HP.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs JNP.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, JNP.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while JNP.DE trades at €34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas JNP.DE's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JNP.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to JNP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check JNP.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs ADV.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ADV.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while ADV.DE trades at €22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas ADV.DE's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADV.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to ADV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check ADV.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs ADVV.F Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ADVV.F has a market cap of 837.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while ADVV.F trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas ADVV.F's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADVV.F's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to ADVV.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check ADVV.F's competition here
FQT.DE vs CEK.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, CEK.DE has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while CEK.DE trades at €11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas CEK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEK.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to CEK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check CEK.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs CEA.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, CEA.DE has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while CEA.DE trades at €4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas CEA.DE's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEA.DE's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to CEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check CEA.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs TLFP.BE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, TLFP.BE has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while TLFP.BE trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas TLFP.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLFP.BE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to TLFP.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check TLFP.BE's competition here
FQT.DE vs GGS.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, GGS.DE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while GGS.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas GGS.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGS.DE's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to GGS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check GGS.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs TLIK.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, TLIK.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while TLIK.DE trades at €0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas TLIK.DE's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLIK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to TLIK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check TLIK.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs M0YN.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, M0YN.DE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while M0YN.DE trades at €0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas M0YN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to M0YN.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is less volatile compared to M0YN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check M0YN.DE's competition here
FQT.DE vs GGS.F Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, GGS.F has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while GGS.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas GGS.F's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGS.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is less volatile compared to GGS.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check GGS.F's competition here
FQT.DE vs M0Y.DE Comparison April 2026
FQT.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FQT.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, M0Y.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FQT.DE is priced at €77.20, while M0Y.DE trades at €28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FQT.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 50.67, whereas M0Y.DE's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, FQT.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to M0Y.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FQT.DE is more volatile compared to M0Y.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FQT.DE.Check M0Y.DE's competition here