First Pacific Company Limited
First Pacific Company Limited (FPAFY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FPAFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPAFY | $4.10 | +2.24% | 3.4B | 5.70 | $0.71 | +3.66% |
| UVRBY | $14.18 | +0.00% | 249.8B | 14.62 | $0.97 | +0.09% |
| NSRGY | $92.27 | -1.16% | 237.9B | 18.31 | $5.04 | +3.68% |
| NSRGF | $90.99 | -1.05% | 235.4B | 17.73 | $5.25 | +4.05% |
| GPDNF | $79.60 | +0.00% | 51.4B | 21.63 | $3.68 | +3.06% |
| DANOY | $15.69 | -0.57% | 50.6B | 21.48 | $0.73 | +3.00% |
| JBSAY | $13.81 | +3.06% | 30.6B | 6.94 | $1.99 | +14.81% |
| AJINF | $27.00 | +0.00% | 26.8B | 112.50 | $0.24 | +1.01% |
| ASBFF | $31.08 | +11.47% | 22.2B | 13.00 | $2.39 | +3.72% |
| ASBFY | $30.38 | -0.78% | 21.7B | 12.74 | $2.39 | +3.87% |
Stock Comparison
FPAFY vs UVRBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while UVRBY trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check UVRBY's competition here
FPAFY vs NSRGY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 237.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NSRGY trades at $92.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NSRGY's competition here
FPAFY vs NSRGF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 235.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NSRGF trades at $90.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NSRGF's competition here
FPAFY vs GPDNF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GPDNF trades at $79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GPDNF's competition here
FPAFY vs DANOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while DANOY trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check DANOY's competition here
FPAFY vs JBSAY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while JBSAY trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check JBSAY's competition here
FPAFY vs AJINF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while AJINF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 112.50. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check AJINF's competition here
FPAFY vs ASBFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ASBFF trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to ASBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ASBFF's competition here
FPAFY vs ASBFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ASBFY trades at $30.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ASBFY's competition here
FPAFY vs KRYAF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while KRYAF trades at $105.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check KRYAF's competition here
FPAFY vs KRYAY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while KRYAY trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check KRYAY's competition here
FPAFY vs AJINY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while AJINY trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 111.79. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check AJINY's competition here
FPAFY vs JDEPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while JDEPF trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check JDEPF's competition here
FPAFY vs WHGRF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while WHGRF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check WHGRF's competition here
FPAFY vs WHGLY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while WHGLY trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check WHGLY's competition here
FPAFY vs BMBOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while BMBOY trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check BMBOY's competition here
FPAFY vs GRBMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GRBMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GRBMF's competition here
FPAFY vs ORKLF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ORKLF trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ORKLF's competition here
FPAFY vs ORKLY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ORKLY trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ORKLY's competition here
FPAFY vs BRZL Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BRZL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while BRZL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas BRZL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRZL's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to BRZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check BRZL's competition here
FPAFY vs CIADF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to CIADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CIADF's competition here
FPAFY vs TTAZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TTAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TTAZF's competition here
FPAFY vs KIKOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while KIKOY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check KIKOY's competition here
FPAFY vs SAPIF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while SAPIF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -69.93. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check SAPIF's competition here
FPAFY vs TYCMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TYCMY trades at $30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TYCMY's competition here
FPAFY vs PIFFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check PIFFY's competition here
FPAFY vs CIADY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CIADY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 541.25. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CIADY's competition here
FPAFY vs KIKOF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while KIKOF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check KIKOF's competition here
FPAFY vs TCYMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TCYMF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TCYMF's competition here
FPAFY vs WWNTF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while WWNTF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check WWNTF's competition here
FPAFY vs TSUKY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TSUKY trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TSUKY's competition here
FPAFY vs TATYY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TATYY trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 46.63. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TATYY's competition here
FPAFY vs SDPNF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check SDPNF's competition here
FPAFY vs ARHUF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ARHUF's competition here
FPAFY vs GPAGF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GPAGF trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GPAGF's competition here
FPAFY vs DLLFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to DLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check DLLFF's competition here
FPAFY vs GCHOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GCHOY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GCHOY's competition here
FPAFY vs TSUKF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TSUKF's competition here
FPAFY vs LOTBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while LOTBY trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check LOTBY's competition here
FPAFY vs NFPDF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NFPDF's competition here
FPAFY vs MEJHY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while MEJHY trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check MEJHY's competition here
FPAFY vs MEJHF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check MEJHF's competition here
FPAFY vs CFEIY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CFEIY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to CFEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CFEIY's competition here
FPAFY vs EMLZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while EMLZF trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check EMLZF's competition here
FPAFY vs CHFLF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CHFLF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CHFLF's competition here
FPAFY vs SMPFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to SMPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check SMPFF's competition here
FPAFY vs IOIOF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to IOIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check IOIOF's competition here
FPAFY vs NSLYF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NSLYF trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NSLYF's competition here
FPAFY vs PIFMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while PIFMY trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check PIFMY's competition here
FPAFY vs PIFMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check PIFMF's competition here
FPAFY vs GLAPY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GLAPY trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GLAPY's competition here
FPAFY vs GLAPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GLAPF trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GLAPF's competition here
FPAFY vs ACOPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ACOPF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ACOPF's competition here
FPAFY vs MRRTY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while MRRTY trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check MRRTY's competition here
FPAFY vs YMZBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while YMZBY trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check YMZBY's competition here
FPAFY vs NIPMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NIPMY's competition here
FPAFY vs UVRBF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to UVRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check UVRBF's competition here
FPAFY vs CRWKF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CRWKF's competition here
FPAFY vs NSFMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NSFMF's competition here
FPAFY vs FPAFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while FPAFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check FPAFF's competition here
FPAFY vs NHFOF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NHFOF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NHFOF's competition here
FPAFY vs TATYF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TATYF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TATYF's competition here
FPAFY vs NCHEY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NCHEY's competition here
FPAFY vs PRBZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while PRBZF trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check PRBZF's competition here
FPAFY vs CBCFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CBCFF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CBCFF's competition here
FPAFY vs LYSFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while LYSFF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check LYSFF's competition here
FPAFY vs EBRPY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to EBRPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check EBRPY's competition here
FPAFY vs EBRPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to EBRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check EBRPF's competition here
FPAFY vs TBLMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TBLMF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TBLMF's competition here
FPAFY vs LYSFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while LYSFY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check LYSFY's competition here
FPAFY vs MLFNF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while MLFNF trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check MLFNF's competition here
FPAFY vs SUEZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while SUEZF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check SUEZF's competition here
FPAFY vs ARZTY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ARZTY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ARZTY's competition here
FPAFY vs ARZTF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check ARZTF's competition here
FPAFY vs SUEZY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while SUEZY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to SUEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check SUEZY's competition here
FPAFY vs PFODF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while PFODF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check PFODF's competition here
FPAFY vs CLBEY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while CLBEY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check CLBEY's competition here
FPAFY vs PRRFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while PRRFY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check PRRFY's competition here
FPAFY vs SGLJF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check SGLJF's competition here
FPAFY vs GRPBF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GRPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GRPBF's competition here
FPAFY vs FSRCY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while FSRCY trades at $124.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check FSRCY's competition here
FPAFY vs FTROF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while FTROF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check FTROF's competition here
FPAFY vs HOFJF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while HOFJF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check HOFJF's competition here
FPAFY vs GNCGY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GNCGY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GNCGY's competition here
FPAFY vs TBLMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TBLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TBLMY's competition here
FPAFY vs AVSFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check AVSFY's competition here
FPAFY vs YNNHF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check YNNHF's competition here
FPAFY vs FNEVF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check FNEVF's competition here
FPAFY vs HLFGY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check HLFGY's competition here
FPAFY vs TUFUF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TUFUF's competition here
FPAFY vs GNCGF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GNCGF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GNCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GNCGF's competition here
FPAFY vs NISUY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check NISUY's competition here
FPAFY vs FNEVY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while FNEVY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check FNEVY's competition here
FPAFY vs VTSYF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while VTSYF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check VTSYF's competition here
FPAFY vs TUFBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while TUFBY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check TUFBY's competition here
FPAFY vs AKEJF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check AKEJF's competition here
FPAFY vs GBFBF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to GBFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check GBFBF's competition here
FPAFY vs JWLLF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while JWLLF trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check JWLLF's competition here
FPAFY vs HLTFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFY is priced at $4.10, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.70, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, FPAFY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFY is more volatile compared to HLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFY.Check HLTFF's competition here