First Pacific Company Limited
First Pacific Company Limited (FPAFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FPAFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPAFF | $0.81 | +5.10% | 3.5B | 5.82 | $0.14 | +4.26% |
| UVRBY | $14.18 | +0.00% | 249.8B | 14.47 | $0.98 | +0.09% |
| NSRGY | $89.78 | -0.10% | 231B | 17.78 | $5.05 | +3.78% |
| NSRGF | $90.59 | +0.05% | 226.1B | 17.70 | $5.05 | +4.14% |
| DANOY | $15.28 | +0.66% | 49.1B | 20.55 | $0.74 | +3.09% |
| GPDNF | $75.87 | -4.69% | 49B | 20.62 | $3.68 | +3.21% |
| JBSAY | $13.81 | +3.06% | 30.6B | 6.94 | $1.99 | +14.81% |
| AJINF | $27.00 | +0.00% | 26.8B | 112.50 | $0.24 | +1.01% |
| ASBFF | $31.08 | +0.00% | 22.2B | 12.90 | $2.41 | +3.72% |
| ASBFY | $30.03 | -1.15% | 21.6B | 12.55 | $2.41 | +3.90% |
Stock Comparison
FPAFF vs UVRBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while UVRBY trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check UVRBY's competition here
FPAFF vs NSRGY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 231B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NSRGY trades at $89.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NSRGY's competition here
FPAFF vs NSRGF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 226.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NSRGF trades at $90.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NSRGF's competition here
FPAFF vs DANOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while DANOY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check DANOY's competition here
FPAFF vs GPDNF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GPDNF trades at $75.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check GPDNF's competition here
FPAFF vs JBSAY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while JBSAY trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check JBSAY's competition here
FPAFF vs AJINF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while AJINF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 112.50. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check AJINF's competition here
FPAFF vs ASBFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ASBFF trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to ASBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check ASBFF's competition here
FPAFF vs ASBFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ASBFY trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check ASBFY's competition here
FPAFF vs KRYAY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while KRYAY trades at $103.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check KRYAY's competition here
FPAFF vs KRYAF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while KRYAF trades at $103.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check KRYAF's competition here
FPAFF vs JDEPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while JDEPF trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and JDEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDEPF's competition here
FPAFF vs AJINY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while AJINY trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 114.57. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check AJINY's competition here
FPAFF vs WHGLY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while WHGLY trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check WHGLY's competition here
FPAFF vs GRBMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GRBMF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check GRBMF's competition here
FPAFF vs WHGRF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while WHGRF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check WHGRF's competition here
FPAFF vs BMBOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while BMBOY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check BMBOY's competition here
FPAFF vs ORKLF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ORKLF trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check ORKLF's competition here
FPAFF vs ORKLY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ORKLY trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check ORKLY's competition here
FPAFF vs BRZL Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BRZL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while BRZL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas BRZL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRZL's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to BRZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check BRZL's competition here
FPAFF vs CIADF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIADF's competition here
FPAFF vs TTAZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTAZF's competition here
FPAFF vs SAPIF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while SAPIF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check SAPIF's competition here
FPAFF vs WWNTF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while WWNTF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and WWNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWNTF's competition here
FPAFF vs KIKOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while KIKOY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check KIKOY's competition here
FPAFF vs PIFFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check PIFFY's competition here
FPAFF vs CIADY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CIADY trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 534.75. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check CIADY's competition here
FPAFF vs KIKOF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while KIKOF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check KIKOF's competition here
FPAFF vs TYCMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TYCMY trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TYCMY's competition here
FPAFF vs TCYMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TCYMF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TCYMF's competition here
FPAFF vs ARHUF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ARHUF trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and ARHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHUF's competition here
FPAFF vs MEJHY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while MEJHY trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check MEJHY's competition here
FPAFF vs TATYY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TATYY trades at $29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and TATYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TATYY's competition here
FPAFF vs SDPNF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check SDPNF's competition here
FPAFF vs TSUKY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TSUKY trades at $68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TSUKY's competition here
FPAFF vs GPAGF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GPAGF trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check GPAGF's competition here
FPAFF vs DLLFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLLFF's competition here
FPAFF vs GCHOY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GCHOY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check GCHOY's competition here
FPAFF vs TSUKF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TSUKF's competition here
FPAFF vs LOTBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while LOTBY trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check LOTBY's competition here
FPAFF vs NFPDF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NFPDF's competition here
FPAFF vs MEJHF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check MEJHF's competition here
FPAFF vs CFEIY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CFEIY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to CFEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check CFEIY's competition here
FPAFF vs EMLZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while EMLZF trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check EMLZF's competition here
FPAFF vs CHFLF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CHFLF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check CHFLF's competition here
FPAFF vs SMPFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMPFF's competition here
FPAFF vs IOIOF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOIOF's competition here
FPAFF vs PIFMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while PIFMY trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check PIFMY's competition here
FPAFF vs NSLYF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NSLYF trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NSLYF's competition here
FPAFF vs PIFMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check PIFMF's competition here
FPAFF vs GLAPY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GLAPY trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and GLAPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLAPY's competition here
FPAFF vs GLAPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GLAPF trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check GLAPF's competition here
FPAFF vs ACOPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ACOPF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and ACOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACOPF's competition here
FPAFF vs YMZBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while YMZBY trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check YMZBY's competition here
FPAFF vs NIPMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NIPMY's competition here
FPAFF vs MRRTY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while MRRTY trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check MRRTY's competition here
FPAFF vs UVRBF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UVRBF's competition here
FPAFF vs FPAFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while FPAFY trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check FPAFY's competition here
FPAFF vs CRWKF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check CRWKF's competition here
FPAFF vs NSFMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NSFMF's competition here
FPAFF vs NHFOF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NHFOF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NHFOF's competition here
FPAFF vs TATYF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TATYF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TATYF's competition here
FPAFF vs NCHEY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NCHEY's competition here
FPAFF vs PRBZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while PRBZF trades at $64.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check PRBZF's competition here
FPAFF vs CBCFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CBCFF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check CBCFF's competition here
FPAFF vs LYSFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while LYSFF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check LYSFF's competition here
FPAFF vs EBRPY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRPY's competition here
FPAFF vs EBRPF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRPF's competition here
FPAFF vs TBLMF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TBLMF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TBLMF's competition here
FPAFF vs LYSFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while LYSFY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check LYSFY's competition here
FPAFF vs SUEZF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while SUEZF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and SUEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUEZF's competition here
FPAFF vs MLFNF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while MLFNF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check MLFNF's competition here
FPAFF vs ARZTY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ARZTY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check ARZTY's competition here
FPAFF vs ARZTF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check ARZTF's competition here
FPAFF vs SUEZY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while SUEZY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUEZY's competition here
FPAFF vs CLBEY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while CLBEY trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check CLBEY's competition here
FPAFF vs PFODF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while PFODF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check PFODF's competition here
FPAFF vs SGLJF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check SGLJF's competition here
FPAFF vs PRRFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while PRRFY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and PRRFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRFY's competition here
FPAFF vs GRPBF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRPBF's competition here
FPAFF vs FTROF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while FTROF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check FTROF's competition here
FPAFF vs HOFJF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while HOFJF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check HOFJF's competition here
FPAFF vs TBLMY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBLMY's competition here
FPAFF vs FSRCY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check FSRCY's competition here
FPAFF vs AVSFY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check AVSFY's competition here
FPAFF vs GNCGY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GNCGY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and GNCGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNCGY's competition here
FPAFF vs YNNHF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check YNNHF's competition here
FPAFF vs FNEVF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check FNEVF's competition here
FPAFF vs HLFGY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check HLFGY's competition here
FPAFF vs TUFUF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TUFUF's competition here
FPAFF vs GNCGF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GNCGF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and GNCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNCGF's competition here
FPAFF vs NISUY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check NISUY's competition here
FPAFF vs FNEVY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while FNEVY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check FNEVY's competition here
FPAFF vs VTSYF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while VTSYF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check VTSYF's competition here
FPAFF vs TUFBY Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while TUFBY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check TUFBY's competition here
FPAFF vs AKEJF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check AKEJF's competition here
FPAFF vs GBFBF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBFBF's competition here
FPAFF vs JWLLF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while JWLLF trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF is less volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPAFF.Check JWLLF's competition here
FPAFF vs HLTFF Comparison July 2025
FPAFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPAFF stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPAFF is priced at $0.81, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPAFF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.82, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, FPAFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FPAFF and HLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTFF's competition here