Forterra plc
Forterra plc (FORT.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FORT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORT.L | £197.20 | -0.90% | 415.3M | 28.17 | £0.07 | +1.51% |
| CRH.L | £7,228.00 | -1.90% | 48.9B | 20.42 | £3.54 | +1.64% |
| 0LRK.L | £280.41 | +0.18% | 37B | 62.17 | £4.51 | +0.67% |
| 0JZ0.L | £604.04 | +6.18% | 36.4B | 57.40 | £10.52 | +0.52% |
| 0QKY.L | £41.60 | -0.71% | 24.8B | 11.18 | £3.72 | +118.22% |
| 0QQ2.L | £495.10 | -0.89% | 18B | 23.70 | £20.89 | +2.03% |
| 0JZ1.L | £70.43 | +3.16% | 14.5B | 30.94 | £2.24 | +1.73% |
| 0Y5C.L | £165.16 | -0.11% | 14.2B | 31.66 | £5.22 | +1.19% |
| 0RH9.L | £182.40 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 15.38 | £11.86 | +2.19% |
| 0M6J.L | £108.40 | +2.85% | 1.8B | 5.78 | £18.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FORT.L vs CRH.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, CRH.L has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while CRH.L trades at £7,228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas CRH.L's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRH.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to CRH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check CRH.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0LRK.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0LRK.L has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0LRK.L trades at £280.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0LRK.L's P/E ratio is 62.17. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LRK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0LRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0LRK.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0JZ0.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0JZ0.L has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0JZ0.L trades at £604.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0JZ0.L's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JZ0.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0JZ0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0JZ0.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0QKY.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0QKY.L has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0QKY.L trades at £41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0QKY.L's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QKY.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0QKY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0QKY.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0QQ2.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0QQ2.L has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0QQ2.L trades at £495.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0QQ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QQ2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0QQ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0QQ2.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0JZ1.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0JZ1.L has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0JZ1.L trades at £70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0JZ1.L's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JZ1.L's ROE of -4.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0JZ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0JZ1.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0Y5C.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0Y5C.L has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0Y5C.L trades at £165.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0Y5C.L's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0Y5C.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0Y5C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0Y5C.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0RH9.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0RH9.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0RH9.L trades at £182.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0RH9.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RH9.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0RH9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0RH9.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0M6J.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0M6J.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0M6J.L trades at £108.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0M6J.L's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0M6J.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0M6J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0M6J.L's competition here
FORT.L vs SRC.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, SRC.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while SRC.L trades at £114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas SRC.L's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to SRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check SRC.L's competition here
FORT.L vs BREE.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, BREE.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while BREE.L trades at £363.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas BREE.L's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BREE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to BREE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check BREE.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0R6S.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0R6S.L has a market cap of 819.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0R6S.L trades at £72.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0R6S.L's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0R6S.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0R6S.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0R6S.L's competition here
FORT.L vs JHDA.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, JHDA.L has a market cap of 655.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while JHDA.L trades at £75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas JHDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JHDA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to JHDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check JHDA.L's competition here
FORT.L vs IBST.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, IBST.L has a market cap of 581.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while IBST.L trades at £147.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas IBST.L's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBST.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to IBST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check IBST.L's competition here
FORT.L vs MSLH.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, MSLH.L has a market cap of 513.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while MSLH.L trades at £203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas MSLH.L's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSLH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is less volatile compared to MSLH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check MSLH.L's competition here
FORT.L vs MBH.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, MBH.L has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while MBH.L trades at £107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas MBH.L's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBH.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to MBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check MBH.L's competition here
FORT.L vs STCM.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, STCM.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while STCM.L trades at £16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas STCM.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STCM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is less volatile compared to STCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check STCM.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 0P000147QB.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 0P000147QB.L has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 0P000147QB.L trades at £99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 0P000147QB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0P000147QB.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147QB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 0P000147QB.L's competition here
FORT.L vs PU12.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, PU12.L has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while PU12.L trades at £24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas PU12.L's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PU12.L's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is less volatile compared to PU12.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check PU12.L's competition here
FORT.L vs ECOB.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, ECOB.L has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while ECOB.L trades at £3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas ECOB.L's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECOB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is less volatile compared to ECOB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check ECOB.L's competition here
FORT.L vs 97GM.L Comparison August 2025
FORT.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORT.L stands at 415.3M. In comparison, 97GM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FORT.L is priced at £197.20, while 97GM.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 28.17, whereas 97GM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORT.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 97GM.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FORT.L is more volatile compared to 97GM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORT.L.Check 97GM.L's competition here