First Northern Community Bancorp
First Northern Community Bancorp FNRN Peers
See (FNRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNRN | $9.80 | -0.51% | 155.8M | 8.52 | $1.15 | N/A |
| CAIXY | $2.76 | -3.57% | 175.9B | 8.62 | $0.32 | +6.02% |
| CIHKY | $34.43 | +1.04% | 167.5B | 8.81 | $3.91 | +3.94% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.3B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| AAMAF | $0.09 | +939900.00% | 133.2B | -0.85 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -21.69% | 123.4B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| UNCFF | $66.30 | -1.36% | 103.3B | 9.53 | $6.96 | +3.48% |
| BNPQF | $89.00 | +0.36% | 100.5B | 8.20 | $10.86 | +6.06% |
| UNCRY | $32.03 | -4.10% | 99.8B | 9.20 | $3.48 | +2.34% |
| IITSF | $5.57 | -1.59% | 99B | 9.60 | $0.58 | +6.67% |
Stock Comparison
FNRN vs CAIXY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CAIXY trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CIHKY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CIHKY trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKAYY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs AAMAF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, AAMAF has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while AAMAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas AAMAF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAMAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to AAMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CIHHF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs UNCFF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while UNCFF trades at $66.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BNPQF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BNPQF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs UNCRY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while UNCRY trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs IITSF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while IITSF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs DBSDY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while DBSDY trades at $138.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BNPQY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BNPQY trades at $43.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs DBSDF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while DBSDF trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs KBCSY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while KBCSY trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SBKFF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SBKFF trades at $85.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CHCJY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CHCJY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs MZHOF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while MZHOF trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PBCRY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PBCRY trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs AKSJF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs EBKDY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while EBKDY trades at $41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PBCRF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PBCRF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs LLOBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while LLOBF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs OVCHF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while OVCHF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PSBKF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PSBKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CIXPF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CIXPF trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs LLDTF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs OVCHY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while OVCHY trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CRARF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CRARF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CRARY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CRARY trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CHBJF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CHBJF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs NRDBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while NRDBY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs NBNKF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while NBNKF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs UOVEF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BHKLY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BHKLY trades at $88.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs STNDF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs UOVEY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while UOVEY trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs DNBBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while DNBBF trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SCGLY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SCGLY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs DNBBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while DNBBY trades at $27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BNKHF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BNKHF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CRZBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CRZBF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs KBCSF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while KBCSF trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CWESF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SCGLF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SCGLF trades at $54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs JPPTY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while JPPTY trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKRKF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKRKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKRKY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKRKY trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CRZBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CRZBY trades at $31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SVKEF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SVKEF trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs JPSTF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs DNKEY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while DNKEY trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs EBKOF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while EBKOF trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SWDBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SWDBF trades at $27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CMAKY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CMAKY trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CEBCF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs JPHLF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PPERY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PPERY trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SWDBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SWDBY trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs DNSKF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while DNSKF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs JPPHY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while JPPHY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs HSNGY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while HSNGY trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs MLYBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while MLYBY trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PPERF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PPERF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs GBOOF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while GBOOF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SBGOF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SBGOF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs GBOOY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while GBOOY trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BLMIF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BLMIF trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs HSNGF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs FCNCB Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while FCNCB trades at $1,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PSZKF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PSZKF trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PSZKY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PSZKY trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BDORY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BDORY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKHYY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKHYY trades at $83.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BPXXY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CKHGY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CKHGY trades at $94.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SGBLY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SGBLY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs MLYNF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while MLYNF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CGMBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CGMBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SUTNY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SUTNY trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs MDIBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while MDIBY trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BDOUF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BDOUF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CRDIY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs PBLOF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKHPF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKHPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs AIBGY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while AIBGY trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs AIBRF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while AIBRF trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs ISNPY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while ISNPY trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CMTDF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CMTDF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs GPFOY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs GPFOF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while GPFOF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SKCBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SKCBY trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs RSNHF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while RSNHF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BNCZF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs OTPBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs SUGBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKRIF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKRIF trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs MDIBF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs BKRIY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while BKRIY trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs TKGBY Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while TKGBY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is more volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.
FNRN vs CIMDF Comparison
FNRN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNRN stands at 155.8M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNRN is priced at $9.80, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNRN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FNRN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNRN is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNRN.