Fineqia International Inc.
Fineqia International Inc. (FNQQF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNQQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNQQF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 14.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HAHRF | $10.24 | +68.70% | 6.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.77% |
| SREDF | $13.65 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 10.83 | $1.26 | +3.17% |
| SREDY | $21.70 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 10.43 | $2.08 | +2.76% |
| PHLLF | $3.10 | +6762.72% | 3.4B | 3.63 | $0.86 | +18.04% |
| CYLTF | $6.58 | +23.45% | 3.2B | 8.20 | $0.80 | +4.26% |
| KNKBF | $11.12 | -5.01% | 3.1B | -0.43 | -$25.75 | N/A |
| AMLTF | $1.04 | +9.28% | 2.6B | 26.00 | $0.04 | +2.04% |
| THNVF | $1.08 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 7.20 | $0.15 | +5.82% |
| THNUY | $9.85 | +0.00% | 1B | 6.08 | $1.62 | +9.25% |
Stock Comparison
FNQQF vs HAHRF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, HAHRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while HAHRF trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to HAHRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and HAHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAHRF's competition here
FNQQF vs SREDF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, SREDF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while SREDF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREDF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to SREDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to SREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check SREDF's competition here
FNQQF vs SREDY Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, SREDY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while SREDY trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREDY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to SREDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to SREDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check SREDY's competition here
FNQQF vs PHLLF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, PHLLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while PHLLF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHLLF's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to PHLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to PHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check PHLLF's competition here
FNQQF vs CYLTF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, CYLTF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while CYLTF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYLTF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to CYLTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and CYLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYLTF's competition here
FNQQF vs KNKBF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, KNKBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while KNKBF trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNKBF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to KNKBF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and KNKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNKBF's competition here
FNQQF vs AMLTF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, AMLTF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while AMLTF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMLTF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to AMLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and AMLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMLTF's competition here
FNQQF vs THNVF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, THNVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while THNVF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNVF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to THNVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and THNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THNVF's competition here
FNQQF vs THNUY Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, THNUY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while THNUY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNUY's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to THNUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and THNUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THNUY's competition here
FNQQF vs GDLC Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, GDLC has a market cap of 795.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while GDLC trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to GDLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to GDLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check GDLC's competition here
FNQQF vs TMILF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, TMILF has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while TMILF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to TMILF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and TMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMILF's competition here
FNQQF vs MGOM Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, MGOM has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while MGOM trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGOM's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to MGOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and MGOM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGOM's competition here
FNQQF vs PCTZF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, PCTZF has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while PCTZF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTZF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to PCTZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and PCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCTZF's competition here
FNQQF vs NACQF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, NACQF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while NACQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NACQF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to NACQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to NACQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check NACQF's competition here
FNQQF vs FGCO Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, FGCO has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while FGCO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to FGCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and FGCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGCO's competition here
FNQQF vs RLYNF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, RLYNF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while RLYNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLYNF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to RLYNF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to RLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check RLYNF's competition here
FNQQF vs MSBM Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, MSBM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while MSBM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to MSBM's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to MSBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check MSBM's competition here
FNQQF vs GPLB Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, GPLB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while GPLB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to GPLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and GPLB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPLB's competition here
FNQQF vs SPXA Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, SPXA has a market cap of 581K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while SPXA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXA's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to SPXA's ROE of +174.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to SPXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check SPXA's competition here
FNQQF vs RNBI Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, RNBI has a market cap of 27.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while RNBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to RNBI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and RNBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNBI's competition here
FNQQF vs PGIE Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, PGIE has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while PGIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to PGIE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to PGIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check PGIE's competition here
FNQQF vs TMOL Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, TMOL has a market cap of 20.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while TMOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to TMOL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to TMOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check TMOL's competition here
FNQQF vs XYNH Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, XYNH has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while XYNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYNH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to XYNH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to XYNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check XYNH's competition here
FNQQF vs IMMG Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, IMMG has a market cap of 15.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while IMMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to IMMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to IMMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check IMMG's competition here
FNQQF vs EWPI Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, EWPI has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while EWPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWPI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to EWPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to EWPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check EWPI's competition here
FNQQF vs PWEI Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, PWEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while PWEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to PWEI's ROE of -4.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to PWEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check PWEI's competition here
FNQQF vs ARGW Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ARGW has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while ARGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to ARGW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to ARGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check ARGW's competition here
FNQQF vs KCPC Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, KCPC has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while KCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to KCPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and KCPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCPC's competition here
FNQQF vs AQFD Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, AQFD has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while AQFD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQFD's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to AQFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to AQFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check AQFD's competition here
FNQQF vs EURI Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, EURI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while EURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to EURI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to EURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check EURI's competition here
FNQQF vs ODMO Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ODMO has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while ODMO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to ODMO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and ODMO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODMO's competition here
FNQQF vs HLOI Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, HLOI has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while HLOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to HLOI's ROE of +36.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to HLOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check HLOI's competition here
FNQQF vs AKSY Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, AKSY has a market cap of 40. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while AKSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to AKSY's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and AKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKSY's competition here
FNQQF vs ESQF Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ESQF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while ESQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESQF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to ESQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and ESQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESQF's competition here
FNQQF vs APLN Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, APLN has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while APLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to APLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and APLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APLN's competition here
FNQQF vs MGLO Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, MGLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while MGLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to MGLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and MGLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGLO's competition here
FNQQF vs AHCD Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, AHCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while AHCD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to AHCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and AHCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AHCD's competition here
FNQQF vs AHLD Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, AHLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while AHLD trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to AHLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF and AHLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AHLD's competition here
FNQQF vs OGGCS Comparison August 2025
FNQQF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNQQF stands at 14.9M. In comparison, OGGCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNQQF is priced at $0.01, while OGGCS trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGGCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNQQF's ROE is +3.86%, compared to OGGCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNQQF is less volatile compared to OGGCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNQQF.Check OGGCS's competition here