FinCanna Capital Corp.
FinCanna Capital Corp. (FNNZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNNZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNNZF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 1.8M | 0.04 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AGRIP | $99.80 | +0.05% | 46.8B | 103.63 | $0.96 | N/A |
| ORXCF | $25.66 | +0.00% | 29.1B | 11.61 | $2.21 | +3.19% |
| MIUFY | $16.50 | +7.97% | 11.9B | 12.89 | $1.28 | +3.07% |
| MIUFF | $7.50 | +0.00% | 10.8B | 11.72 | $0.64 | +3.62% |
| EDNMY | $15.40 | -3.75% | 7.4B | 12.73 | $1.21 | +4.40% |
| EDNMF | $30.45 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 13.01 | $2.34 | +4.54% |
| FREJP | $23.51 | +0.00% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FREJO | $22.61 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -248.46 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| MAURY | $44.10 | -0.43% | 4B | 22.73 | $1.94 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
FNNZF vs AGRIP Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AGRIP has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AGRIP trades at $99.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AGRIP's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGRIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AGRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AGRIP's competition here
FNNZF vs ORXCF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ORXCF trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ORXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ORXCF's competition here
FNNZF vs MIUFY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MIUFY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MIUFY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MIUFY's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIUFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to MIUFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MIUFY's competition here
FNNZF vs MIUFF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MIUFF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to MIUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MIUFF's competition here
FNNZF vs EDNMY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while EDNMY trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to EDNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check EDNMY's competition here
FNNZF vs EDNMF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while EDNMF trades at $30.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check EDNMF's competition here
FNNZF vs FREJP Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FREJP trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FREJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FREJP's competition here
FNNZF vs FREJO Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FREJO trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -248.46. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FREJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FREJO's competition here
FNNZF vs MAURY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MAURY trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to MAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MAURY's competition here
FNNZF vs ZIZTF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ZIZTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ZIZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ZIZTF's competition here
FNNZF vs CSASF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CSASF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CSASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CSASF's competition here
FNNZF vs CMPRF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CMPRF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CMPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CMPRF's competition here
FNNZF vs MAURF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MAURF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MAURF's competition here
FNNZF vs EHMEF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while EHMEF trades at $146.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to EHMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check EHMEF's competition here
FNNZF vs KGTHY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KGTHY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while KGTHY trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas KGTHY's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGTHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to KGTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check KGTHY's competition here
FNNZF vs AEOJF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AEOJF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AEOJF's competition here
FNNZF vs AATRL Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AATRL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AATRL trades at $61.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AATRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AATRL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AATRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AATRL's competition here
FNNZF vs KRKKF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while KRKKF trades at $91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to KRKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check KRKKF's competition here
FNNZF vs AIFLF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AIFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AIFLF's competition here
FNNZF vs HYPOF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while HYPOF trades at $214.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 84.86. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to HYPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check HYPOF's competition here
FNNZF vs UMTAF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to UMTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check UMTAF's competition here
FNNZF vs AIFLY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AIFLY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AIFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AIFLY's competition here
FNNZF vs PRLPF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 929.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while PRLPF trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to PRLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check PRLPF's competition here
FNNZF vs SHGKY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while SHGKY trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to SHGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check SHGKY's competition here
FNNZF vs ALEDY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 702.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ALEDY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ALEDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ALEDY's competition here
FNNZF vs INJJF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 673M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while INJJF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -55.80. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check INJJF's competition here
FNNZF vs IPFPF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 618.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while IPFPF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to IPFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check IPFPF's competition here
FNNZF vs ITJTY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 604.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ITJTY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -50.10. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ITJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ITJTY's competition here
FNNZF vs ECNCF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 582.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ECNCF trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ECNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ECNCF's competition here
FNNZF vs EGTIF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while EGTIF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to EGTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check EGTIF's competition here
FNNZF vs FDCHF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 453.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FDCHF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FDCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FDCHF's competition here
FNNZF vs FPLPF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 392.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FPLPF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FPLPF's competition here
FNNZF vs FAVO Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FAVO trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FAVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FAVO's competition here
FNNZF vs NECA Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while NECA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check NECA's competition here
FNNZF vs IMMFF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while IMMFF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check IMMFF's competition here
FNNZF vs ZNKKY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ZNKKY trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ZNKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ZNKKY's competition here
FNNZF vs GCSSF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to GCSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check GCSSF's competition here
FNNZF vs SEZNL Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to SEZNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check SEZNL's competition here
FNNZF vs CFNB Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CFNB trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CFNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CFNB's competition here
FNNZF vs RYTTF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to RYTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check RYTTF's competition here
FNNZF vs YUANF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while YUANF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to YUANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check YUANF's competition here
FNNZF vs FIGI Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FIGI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FIGI's competition here
FNNZF vs ACCFF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ACCFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ACCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ACCFF's competition here
FNNZF vs CHFHF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CHFHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CHFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CHFHF's competition here
FNNZF vs IOUFF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to IOUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check IOUFF's competition here
FNNZF vs RMIAF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while RMIAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check RMIAF's competition here
FNNZF vs AMSA Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AMSA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AMSA's competition here
FNNZF vs MRBLF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MRBLF's competition here
FNNZF vs GWSFF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to GWSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check GWSFF's competition here
FNNZF vs PRPS Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while PRPS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to PRPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check PRPS's competition here
FNNZF vs MITJF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MITJF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITJF's ROE of +12.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to MITJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MITJF's competition here
FNNZF vs SPFX Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while SPFX trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to SPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check SPFX's competition here
FNNZF vs MBDC Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while MBDC trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check MBDC's competition here
FNNZF vs AIJTY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AIJTY trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AIJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AIJTY's competition here
FNNZF vs KYNC Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while KYNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check KYNC's competition here
FNNZF vs XSHLF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check XSHLF's competition here
FNNZF vs CUROQ Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CUROQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CUROQ's competition here
FNNZF vs CHWWF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CHWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CHWWF's competition here
FNNZF vs CAFI Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CAFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CAFI's competition here
FNNZF vs ATNPQ Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ATNPQ's competition here
FNNZF vs COSG Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 458.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while COSG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to COSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check COSG's competition here
FNNZF vs CBRJ Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CBRJ's competition here
FNNZF vs CYIO Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 335.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CYIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CYIO's competition here
FNNZF vs CFGX Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CFGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CFGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CFGX's competition here
FNNZF vs BCAP Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while BCAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to BCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check BCAP's competition here
FNNZF vs RBRI Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 93K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while RBRI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBRI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to RBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check RBRI's competition here
FNNZF vs HUNTF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 81.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while HUNTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check HUNTF's competition here
FNNZF vs SUNLQ Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check SUNLQ's competition here
FNNZF vs ECDD Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 30.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ECDD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to ECDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ECDD's competition here
FNNZF vs FDTC Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 17.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FDTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FDTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FDTC's competition here
FNNZF vs ARWD Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while ARWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check ARWD's competition here
FNNZF vs WEIDY Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to WEIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check WEIDY's competition here
FNNZF vs RAHGF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to RAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check RAHGF's competition here
FNNZF vs VIEWF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check VIEWF's competition here
FNNZF vs EPOR Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while EPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to EPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check EPOR's competition here
FNNZF vs EPORP Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EPORP has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while EPORP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EPORP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPORP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to EPORP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check EPORP's competition here
FNNZF vs WORC Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WORC has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while WORC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas WORC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORC's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to WORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check WORC's competition here
FNNZF vs DKGH Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while DKGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to DKGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check DKGH's competition here
FNNZF vs GAFL Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while GAFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAFL's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check GAFL's competition here
FNNZF vs FRNV Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FRNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRNV's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FRNV's competition here
FNNZF vs CHFI Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 577. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CHFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHFI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CHFI's competition here
FNNZF vs CIAS Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CIAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while CIAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CIAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to CIAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check CIAS's competition here
FNNZF vs AWKS Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, AWKS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while AWKS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AWKS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AWKS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to AWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check AWKS's competition here
FNNZF vs TSLMF Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TSLMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while TSLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas TSLMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSLMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to TSLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check TSLMF's competition here
FNNZF vs KTBA Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KTBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while KTBA trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas KTBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KTBA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to KTBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check KTBA's competition here
FNNZF vs FLXP Comparison August 2025
FNNZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNNZF stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FLXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNNZF is priced at $0.00, while FLXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNNZF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FLXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNNZF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLXP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNNZF is more volatile compared to FLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNNZF.Check FLXP's competition here