Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association FNMAS Peers
See (FNMAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNMAS | $12.22 | -0.89% | 7.60B | 1745.71 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMAP | $17.43 | -0.06% | 8.07B | 2490.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMA | $6.62 | +0.15% | 7.67B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNMAL | $17.40 | -13.00% | 7.67B | 2485.71 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMAG | $19.15 | -1.79% | 7.67B | 2735.71 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMFN | $20.09 | N/A | 7.63B | 2870.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMAM | $18.60 | +1.36% | 7.63B | 2657.14 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMFO | $39,000.00 | N/A | 7.63B | 5571428.57 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMAJ | $10.09 | -0.86% | 7.60B | 1441.71 | $0.01 | N/A |
| FNMAI | $9.98 | -1.68% | 7.54B | 1425.57 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FNMAS vs FNMAP Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAP has a market cap of 8.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAP trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAP's P/E ratio is 2490.00. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMA Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMA has a market cap of 7.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMA trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAL Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAL has a market cap of 7.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAL trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAL's P/E ratio is 2485.71. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FNMAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAG Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAG has a market cap of 7.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAG trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAG's P/E ratio is 2735.71. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMFN Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMFN has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMFN trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMFN's P/E ratio is 2870.00. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAM Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAM has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAM trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAM's P/E ratio is 2657.14. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMFO Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMFO has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMFO trades at $39,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMFO's P/E ratio is 5571428.57. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAJ Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAJ has a market cap of 7.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAJ trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAJ's P/E ratio is 1441.71. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAI Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAI has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAI trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAI's P/E ratio is 1425.57. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FNMAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAH Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAH has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAH trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAH's P/E ratio is 1278.57. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FNMAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAN Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAN has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAN trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAN's P/E ratio is 2514.29. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAT Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAT has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAT trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAT's P/E ratio is 1585.71. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FNMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAK Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAK has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAK trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAK's P/E ratio is 2501.43. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKJ Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKJ has a market cap of 7.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKJ trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKJ's P/E ratio is 167.50. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCKJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMAO Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMAO has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMAO trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMAO's P/E ratio is 2358.57. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNMFM Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNMFM has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNMFM trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNMFM's P/E ratio is 2321.43. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNMFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FREGP Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FREGP has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FREGP trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FREGP's P/E ratio is 244.12. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREGP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FREGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCI Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCI has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCI trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCI's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCG Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCG has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCG trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCG's P/E ratio is 235.29. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKL Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKL has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKL trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKL's P/E ratio is 138.60. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCL Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCL has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCL trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCL's P/E ratio is 235.44. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FREJN Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FREJN has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FREJN trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FREJN's P/E ratio is 238.53. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREJN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FREJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCP Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCP has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCP trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCP's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKK Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKK has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKK trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKK's P/E ratio is -1142.86. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCT Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCT has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCT trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCT's P/E ratio is 268.38. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKN Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKN has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKN trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKN's P/E ratio is 137.50. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCJ Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCJ has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCJ trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCJ's P/E ratio is 233.09. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCM Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCM has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCM trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCM's P/E ratio is 236.78. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCC Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCC has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCC trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCC's P/E ratio is -270.50. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKO Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKO has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKO trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKO's P/E ratio is 136.76. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCS Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCS has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCS trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCS's P/E ratio is 235.15. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCK Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCK has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCK trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCK's P/E ratio is 249.85. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCN Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCN has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCN trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCN's P/E ratio is 241.18. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKP Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKP has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKP trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKP's P/E ratio is 232.50. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKM Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKM has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKM trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKM's P/E ratio is 130.51. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCH Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCH has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCH trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCH's P/E ratio is 238.24. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCCO Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCCO has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCCO trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCCO's P/E ratio is 235.88. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FMCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FMCKI Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FMCKI has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FMCKI trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FMCKI's P/E ratio is 133.24. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FMCKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FNLIF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FNLIF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FNLIF trades at $27.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FNLIF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNLIF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FNLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs HMCBF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, HMCBF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while HMCBF trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas HMCBF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMCBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to HMCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs MAMTF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, MAMTF has a market cap of 532.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while MAMTF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas MAMTF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAMTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to MAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs BRLGF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, BRLGF has a market cap of 453.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while BRLGF trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas BRLGF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLGF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to BRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs TBCRF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, TBCRF has a market cap of 426.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while TBCRF trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas TBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBCRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to TBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs AMIVF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, AMIVF has a market cap of 370.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while AMIVF trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas AMIVF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to AMIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FCMGF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FCMGF has a market cap of 314.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FCMGF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FCMGF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCMGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to FCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs CFSU Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, CFSU has a market cap of 170.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while CFSU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas CFSU's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFSU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to CFSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs TFCCF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, TFCCF has a market cap of 29.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while TFCCF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas TFCCF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to TFCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs DVLN Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, DVLN has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while DVLN trades at $4,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas DVLN's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DVLN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to DVLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs YBRHF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, YBRHF has a market cap of 13.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while YBRHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas YBRHF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YBRHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to YBRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs TNSGF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, TNSGF has a market cap of 10.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while TNSGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas TNSGF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNSGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to TNSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs VRTB Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, VRTB has a market cap of 7.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while VRTB trades at $3,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas VRTB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRTB's ROE of -4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to VRTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs LFLS Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, LFLS has a market cap of 4.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while LFLS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas LFLS's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFLS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to LFLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs IMPM Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, IMPM has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while IMPM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas IMPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPM's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to IMPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs FCRM Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, FCRM has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while FCRM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas FCRM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to FCRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs VAYK Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, VAYK has a market cap of 971172.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while VAYK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas VAYK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to VAYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs STXMF Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, STXMF has a market cap of 330922.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while STXMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas STXMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STXMF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to STXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs RFNS Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, RFNS has a market cap of 12510.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while RFNS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas RFNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RFNS's ROE of +5.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is less volatile compared to RFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs NFSE Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, NFSE has a market cap of 3188.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while NFSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas NFSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFSE's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to NFSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs SOHI Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, SOHI has a market cap of 1062.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while SOHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas SOHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to SOHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.
FNMAS vs DOMR Comparison
FNMAS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMAS stands at 7.60B. In comparison, DOMR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMAS is priced at $12.22, while DOMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMAS currently has a P/E ratio of 1745.71, whereas DOMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMAS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOMR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMAS is more volatile compared to DOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMAS.