Federal National Mortgage Association

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 23.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while RKT trades at $11.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is 56.79. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 12.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while UWMC trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while MMAC trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAI has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAI trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAI's P/E ratio is 1420.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKJ has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKJ trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKJ's P/E ratio is 171.18. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 7.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while COOP trades at $117.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAJ has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAJ trades at $10.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAJ's P/E ratio is 1441.43. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAO has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAO trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAO's P/E ratio is 2428.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAM has a market cap of 7.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAM trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAM's P/E ratio is 2642.86. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FNMAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAT has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAT trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAT's P/E ratio is 1608.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAH has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAH trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAH's P/E ratio is 1318.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAS has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAS trades at $12.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAS's P/E ratio is 1754.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAG has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAG trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAG's P/E ratio is 2792.86. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMFN has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMFN trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFN's P/E ratio is 2900.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMFM has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMFM trades at $16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFM's P/E ratio is 2352.86. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAN has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAN trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAN's P/E ratio is 2500.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAK has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAK trades at $17.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAK's P/E ratio is 2494.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAL has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAL trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAL's P/E ratio is 2517.14. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FNMAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMFO has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMFO trades at $39,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFO's P/E ratio is 5571428.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNMAP has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNMAP trades at $16.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAP's P/E ratio is 2365.71. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while PFSI trades at $97.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCI has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCI trades at $16.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCI's P/E ratio is 240.88. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FREGP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FREGP trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREGP's P/E ratio is 242.65. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREGP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FREGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCC has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCC trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCC's P/E ratio is -261.15. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKI has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKI trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKI's P/E ratio is 136.32. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCK has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCK trades at $16.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCK's P/E ratio is 237.35. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCJ has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCJ trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCJ's P/E ratio is 234.41. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FMCCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKM has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKM trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKM's P/E ratio is 133.68. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCN trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCN's P/E ratio is 241.18. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FMCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCM has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCM trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCM's P/E ratio is 237.50. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKN trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKN's P/E ratio is 135.15. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCG has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCG trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCG's P/E ratio is 235.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCP has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCP trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCP's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKO trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKO's P/E ratio is 136.03. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKK has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKK trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKK's P/E ratio is -1178.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FMCKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCL has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCL trades at $16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCL's P/E ratio is 239.12. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FREJN has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FREJN trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREJN's P/E ratio is 238.53. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREJN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FREJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCT has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCT trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCT's P/E ratio is 261.03. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKP has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKP trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKP's P/E ratio is 239.56. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCH has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCH trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCH's P/E ratio is 238.24. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCO trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCO's P/E ratio is 239.26. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCKL has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCKL trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKL's P/E ratio is 135.07. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FMCCS has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FMCCS trades at $15.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCS's P/E ratio is 228.53. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FMCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while WD trades at $72.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FNLIF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FNLIF trades at $27.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNLIF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNLIF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, HMCBF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while HMCBF trades at $32.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMCBF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMCBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to HMCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 832.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while ECPG trades at $35.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECPG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 797.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while GHLD trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 617.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while VEL trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, MAMTF has a market cap of 532.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while MAMTF trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAMTF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAMTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to MAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, BRLGF has a market cap of 453.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while BRLGF trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLGF's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLGF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to BRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while ATAX trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, TBCRF has a market cap of 414.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while TBCRF trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBCRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to TBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, AMIVF has a market cap of 367.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while AMIVF trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMIVF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to AMIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 356.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while LDI trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while HMPT trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FCMGF has a market cap of 300.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FCMGF trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMGF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCMGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 299.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while ONIT trades at $37.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 276.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while GHI trades at $11.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 251.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while SNFCA trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 215.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while BETR trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BETR's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while OCN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, CFSU has a market cap of 94.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while CFSU trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFSU's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFSU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to CFSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 74.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while IOR trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, TFCCF has a market cap of 29.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while TFCCF trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFCCF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to TFCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, DVLN has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while DVLN trades at $4,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVLN's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DVLN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to DVLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, YBRHF has a market cap of 13.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while YBRHF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YBRHF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YBRHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to YBRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, TNSGF has a market cap of 10.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while TNSGF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNSGF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNSGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to TNSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while IMH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMH's ROE of +47.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, VRTB has a market cap of 7.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while VRTB trades at $3,105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRTB's ROE of -4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to VRTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, LFLS has a market cap of 3.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while LFLS trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLS's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFLS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to LFLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while CNF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 1.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while BETRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -13.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while PAPL trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, IMPM has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while IMPM trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPM's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to IMPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, VAYK has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while VAYK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAYK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to VAYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, FCRM has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while FCRM trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FCRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, STXMF has a market cap of 330922.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while STXMF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STXMF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to STXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, RFNS has a market cap of 12510.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while RFNS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RFNS's ROE of +5.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to RFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, NFSE has a market cap of 3188.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while NFSE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFSE's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to NFSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, SOHI has a market cap of 1062.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while SOHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to SOHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, DOMR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while DOMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOMR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to DOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.

FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 7.46B. In comparison, TWAC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $6.44, while TWAC trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to TWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.