Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal National Mortgage Association FNMA Peers
See (FNMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNMA | $9.79 | -1.51% | 11.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
FNMAI | $11.54 | -0.09% | 11.8B | 1648.57 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMAS | $14.27 | -0.21% | 11.7B | 2038.57 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMFN | $23.00 | -2.34% | 11.5B | 3285.71 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMAT | $12.98 | -1.29% | 11.4B | 1854.29 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMAN | $19.56 | +0.10% | 11.3B | 2794.29 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMAG | $20.82 | N/A | 11.3B | 2974.29 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMAO | $19.00 | +1.93% | 11.3B | 2714.29 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMAP | $19.00 | +1.82% | 11.2B | 2714.29 | $0.01 | N/A |
FNMFM | $20.75 | N/A | 11.1B | 2964.29 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FNMA vs FNMAI Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAI trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAI's P/E ratio is 1648.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAS Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAS trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAS's P/E ratio is 2038.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMFN Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMFN has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMFN trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFN's P/E ratio is 3285.71. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FNMFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAT Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAT trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAT's P/E ratio is 1854.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAN Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAN has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAN trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAN's P/E ratio is 2794.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAG Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAG trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAG's P/E ratio is 2974.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAO Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAO trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAO's P/E ratio is 2714.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAP Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAP has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAP trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAP's P/E ratio is 2714.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMFM Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMFM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMFM trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFM's P/E ratio is 2964.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMFO Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMFO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMFO trades at $41,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMFO's P/E ratio is 5857142.86. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMFO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAK Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAK has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAK trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAK's P/E ratio is 2858.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAJ Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAJ has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAJ trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAJ's P/E ratio is 1671.43. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAH Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAH has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAH trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAH's P/E ratio is 1464.29. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAL Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAL trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAL's P/E ratio is 2722.86. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNMAM Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNMAM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNMAM trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNMAM's P/E ratio is 2928.57. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNMAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKJ Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKJ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKJ trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKJ's P/E ratio is 195.59. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCL Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCL trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCL's P/E ratio is 275.59. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCN Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCN trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCN's P/E ratio is 268.38. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKO Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKO trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKO's P/E ratio is 155.88. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCO Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCO trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCO's P/E ratio is 274.26. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKN Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKN trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKN's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCC Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCC trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCC's P/E ratio is -396.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FREGP Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FREGP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FREGP trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREGP's P/E ratio is 286.91. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREGP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FREGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCP Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCP trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCP's P/E ratio is 276.18. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCM Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCM trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCM's P/E ratio is 271.47. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKP Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKP trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKP's P/E ratio is 269.12. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCK Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCK trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCK's P/E ratio is 275.88. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKM Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKM trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKM's P/E ratio is 157.94. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKK Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKK trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKK's P/E ratio is -1292.14. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCI Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCI trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCI's P/E ratio is 264.56. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKL Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKL trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKL's P/E ratio is 152.21. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCJ Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCJ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCJ trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCJ's P/E ratio is 271.18. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCH Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCH trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCH's P/E ratio is 264.85. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCT Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCT trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCT's P/E ratio is 305.15. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FMCCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCG Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCG trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCG's P/E ratio is 264.41. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FREJN Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FREJN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FREJN trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREJN's P/E ratio is 288.24. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREJN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FREJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCKI Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCKI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCKI trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCKI's P/E ratio is 152.94. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCKI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FMCCS Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FMCCS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FMCCS trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMCCS's P/E ratio is 267.65. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FMCCS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FMCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FNLIF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FNLIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FNLIF trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNLIF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNLIF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to FNLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs HMCBF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HMCBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while HMCBF trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMCBF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMCBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to HMCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs MAMTF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, MAMTF has a market cap of 560.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while MAMTF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAMTF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to MAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs BRLGF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BRLGF has a market cap of 530.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while BRLGF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLGF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLGF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to BRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs TBCRF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TBCRF has a market cap of 452.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while TBCRF trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCRF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBCRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to TBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs AMIVF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, AMIVF has a market cap of 391.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while AMIVF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMIVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to AMIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FCMGF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FCMGF has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FCMGF trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMGF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCMGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs CFSU Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CFSU has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while CFSU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFSU's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFSU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to CFSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs TFCCF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TFCCF has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while TFCCF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFCCF's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to TFCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs DVLN Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DVLN has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while DVLN trades at $4,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVLN's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DVLN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to DVLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs YBRHF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, YBRHF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while YBRHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YBRHF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YBRHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to YBRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs TNSGF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TNSGF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while TNSGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNSGF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNSGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to TNSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs VRTB Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, VRTB has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while VRTB trades at $3,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRTB's ROE of -4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to VRTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs LFLS Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LFLS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while LFLS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFLS's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFLS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to LFLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs IMPM Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, IMPM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while IMPM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPM's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to IMPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs VAYK Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, VAYK has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while VAYK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAYK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to VAYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs STXMF Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, STXMF has a market cap of 330.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while STXMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STXMF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to STXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs FCRM Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, FCRM has a market cap of 182.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while FCRM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to FCRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs NFSE Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, NFSE has a market cap of 41.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while NFSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFSE's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to NFSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs RFNS Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RFNS has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while RFNS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RFNS's ROE of +5.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to RFNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs SOHI Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SOHI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while SOHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to SOHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs DOMR Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, DOMR has a market cap of 8. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while DOMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOMR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is more volatile compared to DOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.
FNMA vs TWAC Comparison
FNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNMA stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TWAC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNMA is priced at $9.79, while TWAC trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNMA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNMA is less volatile compared to TWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNMA.