MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FIYY trades at $103.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FFEU trades at $90.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VTIP trades at $49.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VTAPX trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VFSTX trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VFSUX trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VSBSX trades at $19.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VGSH trades at $58.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VWSTX trades at $15.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while MINT trades at $100.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while ASBFX trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SCHO trades at $24.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while PTSHX trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FTSM trades at $59.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VFISX trades at $9.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SPTS trades at $29.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TMF trades at $35.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VSGBX trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while VSGDX trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SPXL trades at $150.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while JSDHX trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FLVCX trades at $38.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while BITX trades at $55.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TBLL trades at $105.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TECL trades at $72.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FAS trades at $153.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while PAIAX trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FSTTX trades at $9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DHLSX trades at $28.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DIAYX trades at $28.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DWT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SH trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while PRFSX trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while BASOX trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while ACSNX trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while CPLSX trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 843.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while BULZ trades at $138.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 46.23. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 764.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TUA trades at $21.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TAFI trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while EXMAX trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while EMAIX trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 728.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while RYVYX trades at $536.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 728.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while RYCCX trades at $376.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 699.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SOXS trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while RYVLX trades at $536.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while PSQ trades at $36.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SVXY trades at $40.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 597.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SVIX trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 589.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while JSCP trades at $47.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 582.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while GDXU trades at $68.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 547.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DPST trades at $76.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SPXU trades at $19.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 509.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while BPRRX trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 509.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while NVDX trades at $10.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 55.61. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 508.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while BPIRX trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while KOLD trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while GIYAX trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 485.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while NUGT trades at $70.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 447.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FSMB trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 411.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SDS trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DXQLX trades at $91.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SDHY trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SPXS trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FNGO trades at $94.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 42.49. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FSHSX trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 363.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DUST trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 354.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SEMRX trades at $9.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while MRRL trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FLGE trades at $809.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while MORL trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 282.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while UUP trades at $27.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while JNUG trades at $73.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while QID trades at $28.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 269.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while UVXY trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SMB trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TZA trades at $13.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TENG trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while STOT trades at $47.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while NAIL trades at $46.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FTSD trades at $90.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while GGLL trades at $33.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TWUSX trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SDOW trades at $47.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while REML trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while RWM trades at $19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while FUMB trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while USDU trades at $26.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while GUSH trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while AMZU trades at $32.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while ERX trades at $47.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while TMV trades at $41.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while EMNT trades at $98.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while CVSB trades at $50.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SPDN has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while SPDN trades at $10.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SPDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to SPDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while DFEN trades at $42.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.

FNGU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FNGU stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGU is priced at $353.69, while CLSE trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FNGU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, FNGU's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGU is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGU.