MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNGO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGO | $112.06 | -0.06% | 563.5M | 37.49 | $2.99 | N/A |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $50.57 | +0.16% | 60.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.69% |
| VTAPX | $25.36 | +0.16% | 60.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.67% |
| VFSTX | $10.50 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.34% |
| VFSUX | $10.50 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.44% |
| VGSH | $58.79 | +0.12% | 27.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.13% |
| VSBSX | $19.61 | +0.05% | 27.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.10% |
| VWSTX | $15.88 | +0.00% | 16.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
FNGO vs FIYY Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FIYY's competition here
FNGO vs FFEU Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FFEU's competition here
FNGO vs VTIP Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VTIP trades at $50.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VTIP's competition here
FNGO vs VTAPX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VTAPX trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VTAPX's competition here
FNGO vs VFSTX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VFSTX trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VFSTX's competition here
FNGO vs VFSUX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VFSUX trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VFSUX's competition here
FNGO vs VGSH Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VGSH trades at $58.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VGSH's competition here
FNGO vs VSBSX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VSBSX trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VSBSX's competition here
FNGO vs VWSTX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VWSTX trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VWSTX's competition here
FNGO vs MINT Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while MINT trades at $100.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check MINT's competition here
FNGO vs ASBFX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while ASBFX trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check ASBFX's competition here
FNGO vs SCHO Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SCHO trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SCHO's competition here
FNGO vs PTSHX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while PTSHX trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check PTSHX's competition here
FNGO vs FTSM Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FTSM trades at $60.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FTSM's competition here
FNGO vs SPTS Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SPTS trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SPTS's competition here
FNGO vs VFISX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VFISX trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VFISX's competition here
FNGO vs JSDHX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while JSDHX trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check JSDHX's competition here
FNGO vs SPXL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SPXL trades at $193.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SPXL's competition here
FNGO vs TMF Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TMF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TMF's competition here
FNGO vs VSGDX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VSGDX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VSGDX's competition here
FNGO vs VSGBX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VSGBX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VSGBX's competition here
FNGO vs FLVCX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FLVCX trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FLVCX's competition here
FNGO vs TECL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TECL trades at $102.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TECL's competition here
FNGO vs FAS Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FAS trades at $177.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FAS's competition here
FNGO vs BITX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while BITX trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check BITX's competition here
FNGO vs TBLL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TBLL trades at $105.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TBLL's competition here
FNGO vs FSTTX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FSTTX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FSTTX's competition here
FNGO vs DIAYX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DIAYX trades at $30.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DIAYX's competition here
FNGO vs DHLSX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DHLSX trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DHLSX's competition here
FNGO vs DHFCX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DHFCX's competition here
FNGO vs FNGU Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FNGU trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FNGU's competition here
FNGO vs PAIAX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while PAIAX trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check PAIAX's competition here
FNGO vs BULZ Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while BULZ trades at $196.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 65.37. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check BULZ's competition here
FNGO vs DWT Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DWT's competition here
FNGO vs ORSTX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while ORSTX trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check ORSTX's competition here
FNGO vs SOXS Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SOXS trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SOXS's competition here
FNGO vs PRFSX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while PRFSX trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check PRFSX's competition here
FNGO vs RYCCX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while RYCCX trades at $445.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check RYCCX's competition here
FNGO vs RYVYX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while RYVYX trades at $636.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check RYVYX's competition here
FNGO vs RYVLX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while RYVLX trades at $636.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check RYVLX's competition here
FNGO vs ACSNX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while ACSNX trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check ACSNX's competition here
FNGO vs CPLSX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while CPLSX trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check CPLSX's competition here
FNGO vs BASOX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while BASOX trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check BASOX's competition here
FNGO vs SH Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SH trades at $38.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SH's competition here
FNGO vs TAFI Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 843.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TAFI trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TAFI's competition here
FNGO vs UVXY Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 795.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while UVXY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check UVXY's competition here
FNGO vs EMAIX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 758M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while EMAIX trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check EMAIX's competition here
FNGO vs EXMAX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 758M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while EXMAX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check EXMAX's competition here
FNGO vs JSCP Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while JSCP trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check JSCP's competition here
FNGO vs NVDX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 692.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while NVDX trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 59.06. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check NVDX's competition here
FNGO vs DPST Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DPST trades at $109.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DPST's competition here
FNGO vs TUA Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 617.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TUA trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TUA's competition here
FNGO vs GDXU Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 598.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while GDXU trades at $109.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check GDXU's competition here
FNGO vs NUGT Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 582.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while NUGT trades at $101.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check NUGT's competition here
FNGO vs SPXU Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 561M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SPXU trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SPXU's competition here
FNGO vs GIYAX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 549.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while GIYAX trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check GIYAX's competition here
FNGO vs BPIRX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 530.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while BPIRX trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check BPIRX's competition here
FNGO vs BPRRX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 530.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while BPRRX trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check BPRRX's competition here
FNGO vs DXQLX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 525.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DXQLX trades at $106.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DXQLX's competition here
FNGO vs PSQ Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 524.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while PSQ trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check PSQ's competition here
FNGO vs DGAZ Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DGAZ's competition here
FNGO vs FSMB Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FSMB trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FSMB's competition here
FNGO vs SPXS Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SPXS trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SPXS's competition here
FNGO vs SDS Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 461M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SDS trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +7.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SDS's competition here
FNGO vs GGLL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 430.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while GGLL trades at $46.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check GGLL's competition here
FNGO vs SDHY Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SDHY trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SDHY's competition here
FNGO vs NAIL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 398.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while NAIL trades at $82.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check NAIL's competition here
FNGO vs SEMRX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SEMRX trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SEMRX's competition here
FNGO vs FSHSX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FSHSX trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FSHSX's competition here
FNGO vs DFEN Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DFEN trades at $60.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 36.06. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DFEN's competition here
FNGO vs TZA Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TZA trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TZA's competition here
FNGO vs MRRL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check MRRL's competition here
FNGO vs AMZU Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while AMZU trades at $38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check AMZU's competition here
FNGO vs FLGE Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FLGE's competition here
FNGO vs JNUG Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while JNUG trades at $101.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check JNUG's competition here
FNGO vs VIXY Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, VIXY has a market cap of 293.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while VIXY trades at $34.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas VIXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to VIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check VIXY's competition here
FNGO vs MORL Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check MORL's competition here
FNGO vs SMB Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SMB trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SMB's competition here
FNGO vs AAPU Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while AAPU trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check AAPU's competition here
FNGO vs STOT Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while STOT trades at $47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check STOT's competition here
FNGO vs SVXY Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 259.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SVXY trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SVXY's competition here
FNGO vs QID Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while QID trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check QID's competition here
FNGO vs GUSH Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while GUSH trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check GUSH's competition here
FNGO vs FTSD Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FTSD trades at $90.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FTSD's competition here
FNGO vs SDOW Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SDOW trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SDOW's competition here
FNGO vs DUST Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while DUST trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check DUST's competition here
FNGO vs TENG Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TENG's competition here
FNGO vs ERX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while ERX trades at $54.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check ERX's competition here
FNGO vs FUMB Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while FUMB trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check FUMB's competition here
FNGO vs REML Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check REML's competition here
FNGO vs UUP Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while UUP trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check UUP's competition here
FNGO vs TWUSX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TWUSX trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TWUSX's competition here
FNGO vs EMNT Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while EMNT trades at $98.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check EMNT's competition here
FNGO vs SVIX Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while SVIX trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check SVIX's competition here
FNGO vs KOLD Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while KOLD trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check KOLD's competition here
FNGO vs CLSE Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while CLSE trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check CLSE's competition here
FNGO vs TMV Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while TMV trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check TMV's competition here
FNGO vs CVSB Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while CVSB trades at $50.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check CVSB's competition here
FNGO vs PULT Comparison August 2025
FNGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNGO stands at 563.5M. In comparison, PULT has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNGO is priced at $112.06, while PULT trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNGO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.49, whereas PULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNGO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PULT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNGO is more volatile compared to PULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNGO.Check PULT's competition here