Fund.com Inc.
Fund.com Inc. (FNDM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNDM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDM | $2.24 | +0.00% | 1.9M | N/A | -$664.70 | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 113.1B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +0.53% |
| CIIHY | $36.25 | +0.00% | 60.2B | 17.26 | $2.10 | +2.00% |
| MQBKY | $137.04 | -1.35% | 53B | 19.16 | $7.18 | +2.99% |
| MCQEF | $141.12 | +0.47% | 51.5B | 19.63 | $7.19 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $3.03 | +0.00% | 49.6B | 14.43 | $0.21 | +2.40% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | +0.00% | 30B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +4.53% |
| CNICF | $2.68 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 19.14 | $0.14 | +0.94% |
| NRSCF | $6.30 | -6.11% | 18.6B | 7.59 | $0.83 | +6.17% |
Stock Comparison
FNDM vs IBKKF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check IBKKF's competition here
FNDM vs HAITY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check HAITY's competition here
FNDM vs CIIHY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CIIHY trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CIIHY's competition here
FNDM vs MQBKY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while MQBKY trades at $137.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check MQBKY's competition here
FNDM vs MCQEF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while MCQEF trades at $141.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check MCQEF's competition here
FNDM vs CIIHF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CIIHF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CIIHF's competition here
FNDM vs GUOSF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check GUOSF's competition here
FNDM vs CNICF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CNICF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CNICF's competition here
FNDM vs NRSCF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while NRSCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check NRSCF's competition here
FNDM vs HTNGF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check HTNGF's competition here
FNDM vs HUATF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while HUATF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check HUATF's competition here
FNDM vs CMSQY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CMSQY trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CMSQY's competition here
FNDM vs CMSQF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CMSQF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CMSQF's competition here
FNDM vs CGXYY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CGXYY's competition here
FNDM vs DSEEY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DSEEY trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DSEEY's competition here
FNDM vs DSECF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DSECF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DSECF's competition here
FNDM vs WSOUF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check WSOUF's competition here
FNDM vs BRPHF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BRPHF's competition here
FNDM vs IVTJF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check IVTJF's competition here
FNDM vs IGGRF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while IGGRF trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check IGGRF's competition here
FNDM vs IGGHY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while IGGHY trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check IGGHY's competition here
FNDM vs IVTJY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check IVTJY's competition here
FNDM vs CLPE Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CLPE's competition here
FNDM vs FNNTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while FNNTF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check FNNTF's competition here
FNDM vs TCAPF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while TCAPF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check TCAPF's competition here
FNDM vs LTSAP Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while LTSAP trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check LTSAP's competition here
FNDM vs MAUSY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while MAUSY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check MAUSY's competition here
FNDM vs PLSQF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check PLSQF's competition here
FNDM vs LTSA Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check LTSA's competition here
FNDM vs NHMAF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check NHMAF's competition here
FNDM vs MNXBF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while MNXBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check MNXBF's competition here
FNDM vs DEFTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DEFTF's competition here
FNDM vs CFNCF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CFNCF's competition here
FNDM vs CBGPY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 876.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CBGPY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CBGPY's competition here
FNDM vs CBGPF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CBGPF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CBGPF's competition here
FNDM vs CCORF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 809M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CCORF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -35.86. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CCORF's competition here
FNDM vs CNSRF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 793.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CNSRF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CNSRF's competition here
FNDM vs LKADF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check LKADF's competition here
FNDM vs PHIG Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 717.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while PHIG trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check PHIG's competition here
FNDM vs PHIGW Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 674.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check PHIGW's competition here
FNDM vs NAGGF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check NAGGF's competition here
FNDM vs CSCHF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 413.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CSCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CSCHF's competition here
FNDM vs ABGSF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 336M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while ABGSF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check ABGSF's competition here
FNDM vs CESTY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CESTY's competition here
FNDM vs CESTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CESTF's competition here
FNDM vs OSHDF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check OSHDF's competition here
FNDM vs APPCF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while APPCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check APPCF's competition here
FNDM vs CYFRF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CYFRF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 86.15. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CYFRF's competition here
FNDM vs CAGPF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CAGPF's competition here
FNDM vs OZFRY Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check OZFRY's competition here
FNDM vs PNPFF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while PNPFF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check PNPFF's competition here
FNDM vs NPPTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while NPPTF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check NPPTF's competition here
FNDM vs STGC Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check STGC's competition here
FNDM vs ARCNF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check ARCNF's competition here
FNDM vs CURN Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CURN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CURN's competition here
FNDM vs GEVI Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while GEVI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check GEVI's competition here
FNDM vs ABIT Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while ABIT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check ABIT's competition here
FNDM vs DGTLF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DGTLF's competition here
FNDM vs DBKSF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DBKSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DBKSF's competition here
FNDM vs XAUMF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while XAUMF trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check XAUMF's competition here
FNDM vs UFFRF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check UFFRF's competition here
FNDM vs HAFG Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while HAFG trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check HAFG's competition here
FNDM vs DMGGF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DMGGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DMGGF's competition here
FNDM vs CBTTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CBTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CBTTF's competition here
FNDM vs FDCT Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while FDCT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check FDCT's competition here
FNDM vs CMZZF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CMZZF's competition here
FNDM vs BBKCF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BBKCF's competition here
FNDM vs CRMZ Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CRMZ's competition here
FNDM vs CFLSF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CFLSF's competition here
FNDM vs EBML Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check EBML's competition here
FNDM vs HYHDF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while HYHDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check HYHDF's competition here
FNDM vs BULT Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BULT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BULT's competition here
FNDM vs ARBKF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check ARBKF's competition here
FNDM vs SMURF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check SMURF's competition here
FNDM vs BCNWF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BCNWF's competition here
FNDM vs FWAV Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check FWAV's competition here
FNDM vs DYNA Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DYNA's competition here
FNDM vs AVFCF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check AVFCF's competition here
FNDM vs IHLDF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while IHLDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check IHLDF's competition here
FNDM vs MATEF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check MATEF's competition here
FNDM vs DPXCF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check DPXCF's competition here
FNDM vs TRAA Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check TRAA's competition here
FNDM vs ABSOF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while ABSOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check ABSOF's competition here
FNDM vs FFTTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check FFTTF's competition here
FNDM vs ITEX Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while ITEX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check ITEX's competition here
FNDM vs BLVDF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BLVDF's competition here
FNDM vs HIPH Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check HIPH's competition here
FNDM vs BTCWF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BTCWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BTCWF's competition here
FNDM vs CCPUF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CCPUF's competition here
FNDM vs AAMTF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while AAMTF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check AAMTF's competition here
FNDM vs CSTXF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CSTXF's competition here
FNDM vs PHIL Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check PHIL's competition here
FNDM vs BZRD Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BZRD's competition here
FNDM vs CRKR Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CRKR's competition here
FNDM vs BKBLF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BKBLF's competition here
FNDM vs GBCHF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check GBCHF's competition here
FNDM vs BKLIF Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BKLIF's competition here
FNDM vs BLQC Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while BLQC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check BLQC's competition here
FNDM vs CBTC Comparison August 2025
FNDM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNDM stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNDM is priced at $2.24, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNDM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNDM's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FNDM is more volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNDM.Check CBTC's competition here