Farmhouse, Inc
Farmhouse, Inc (FMHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FMHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMHS | $0.19 | +94.30% | 3.5M | -9.71 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $67.85 | -3.17% | 616.2B | 23.80 | $2.85 | +0.86% |
| TCTZF | $66.82 | -3.15% | 606.9B | 23.36 | $2.86 | +0.85% |
| PROSY | $11.25 | -1.49% | 129.4B | 10.90 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $58.64 | +0.00% | 128.2B | 11.36 | $5.16 | +0.19% |
| NAPRF | $314.15 | +0.00% | 50.9B | 10.44 | $30.10 | +0.21% |
| NPSNY | $60.27 | -2.33% | 48.8B | 10.00 | $6.02 | +0.23% |
| KUASF | $9.50 | +1.60% | 41.1B | 19.39 | $0.49 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.80 | +0.00% | 39.6B | 18.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 30.9B | 8.66 | $1.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FMHS vs TCEHY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 616.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while TCEHY trades at $67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check TCEHY's competition here
FMHS vs TCTZF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 606.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while TCTZF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check TCTZF's competition here
FMHS vs PROSY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while PROSY trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PROSY's competition here
FMHS vs PROSF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while PROSF trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PROSF's competition here
FMHS vs NAPRF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while NAPRF trades at $314.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NAPRF's competition here
FMHS vs NPSNY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while NPSNY trades at $60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NPSNY's competition here
FMHS vs KUASF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while KUASF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check KUASF's competition here
FMHS vs KSHTY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while KSHTY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check KSHTY's competition here
FMHS vs BAIDF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while BAIDF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BAIDF's competition here
FMHS vs YAHOF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check YAHOF's competition here
FMHS vs RPGRF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RPGRF trades at $153.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RPGRF's competition here
FMHS vs RPGRY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RPGRY trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RPGRY's competition here
FMHS vs NHNCF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NHNCF's competition here
FMHS vs ADEVF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ADEVF's competition here
FMHS vs ADEVY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ADEVY's competition here
FMHS vs ATDRF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ATDRF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ATDRF's competition here
FMHS vs ATDRY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ATDRY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ATDRY's competition here
FMHS vs CSXXY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while CSXXY trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check CSXXY's competition here
FMHS vs RTMVY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RTMVY trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RTMVY's competition here
FMHS vs RTMVF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RTMVF's competition here
FMHS vs SKLTF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SKLTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 198.13. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SKLTF's competition here
FMHS vs KKKUF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while KKKUF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check KKKUF's competition here
FMHS vs CHLLF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check CHLLF's competition here
FMHS vs OOOOF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check OOOOF's competition here
FMHS vs MEIUF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MEIUF's competition here
FMHS vs HMNTY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while HMNTY trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check HMNTY's competition here
FMHS vs DHGAF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check DHGAF's competition here
FMHS vs MLRYY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MLRYY's competition here
FMHS vs XINXF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check XINXF's competition here
FMHS vs ADBMF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ADBMF's competition here
FMHS vs WNWSF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check WNWSF's competition here
FMHS vs ZGXNF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ZGXNF's competition here
FMHS vs FRRGF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check FRRGF's competition here
FMHS vs VYGPF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check VYGPF's competition here
FMHS vs MECVF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MECVF's competition here
FMHS vs NXCLF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while NXCLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NXCLF's competition here
FMHS vs UUMMF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check UUMMF's competition here
FMHS vs OPNDF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while OPNDF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check OPNDF's competition here
FMHS vs TGRVF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check TGRVF's competition here
FMHS vs HYPPF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while HYPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check HYPPF's competition here
FMHS vs ZMDTF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ZMDTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ZMDTF's competition here
FMHS vs CKPDY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check CKPDY's competition here
FMHS vs RSTN Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RSTN's competition here
FMHS vs CPADF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check CPADF's competition here
FMHS vs MSEZ Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MSEZ's competition here
FMHS vs PXSTF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PXSTF's competition here
FMHS vs BBUZ Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while BBUZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BBUZ's competition here
FMHS vs SABOF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SABOF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SABOF's competition here
FMHS vs RDLYF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RDLYF's competition here
FMHS vs PRSNF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while PRSNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PRSNF's competition here
FMHS vs NIROF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while NIROF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NIROF's competition here
FMHS vs EGLXF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while EGLXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check EGLXF's competition here
FMHS vs GIFX Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while GIFX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check GIFX's competition here
FMHS vs BMTM Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BMTM's competition here
FMHS vs BBTVF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BBTVF's competition here
FMHS vs SFUNY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SFUNY's competition here
FMHS vs YOOIF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while YOOIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check YOOIF's competition here
FMHS vs NUGL Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NUGL's competition here
FMHS vs CRTDW Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check CRTDW's competition here
FMHS vs LBUY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LBUY's competition here
FMHS vs MRNJ Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MRNJ's competition here
FMHS vs MRPT Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MRPT's competition here
FMHS vs QQQFF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check QQQFF's competition here
FMHS vs GOGY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check GOGY's competition here
FMHS vs LTCP Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LTCP's competition here
FMHS vs APMLF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 924.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check APMLF's competition here
FMHS vs SPFYF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 657.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SPFYF's competition here
FMHS vs CYAP Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check CYAP's competition here
FMHS vs ILIM Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ILIM's competition here
FMHS vs VMSI Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check VMSI's competition here
FMHS vs RBDC Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RBDC's competition here
FMHS vs DGTHF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check DGTHF's competition here
FMHS vs LKST Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LKST's competition here
FMHS vs SEEK Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SEEK's competition here
FMHS vs KIWB Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check KIWB's competition here
FMHS vs QTTOY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 78.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while QTTOY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check QTTOY's competition here
FMHS vs ZONX Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ZONX's competition here
FMHS vs OTTV Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check OTTV's competition here
FMHS vs LHGI Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LHGI's competition here
FMHS vs SLNM Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SLNM's competition here
FMHS vs RWRDP Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RWRDP's competition here
FMHS vs HUTN Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check HUTN's competition here
FMHS vs DELCF Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check DELCF's competition here
FMHS vs REDFY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check REDFY's competition here
FMHS vs BTIM Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BTIM's competition here
FMHS vs PIKL Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PIKL's competition here
FMHS vs ISHM Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ISHM's competition here
FMHS vs SHGY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check SHGY's competition here
FMHS vs MDAW Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MDAW's competition here
FMHS vs LOCM Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LOCM's competition here
FMHS vs ROII Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ROII's competition here
FMHS vs DATI Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check DATI's competition here
FMHS vs LOVLQ Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LOVLQ's competition here
FMHS vs ZZLL Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ZZLL's competition here
FMHS vs FRFR Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check FRFR's competition here
FMHS vs INTH Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check INTH's competition here
FMHS vs ABBY Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ABBY's competition here
FMHS vs RAIO Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RAIO's competition here
FMHS vs YITD Comparison August 2025
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 3.5M. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.19, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -9.71, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check YITD's competition here