Farmhouse, Inc
Farmhouse, Inc (FMHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FMHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMHS | $0.10 | +0.00% | 1.8M | -5.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $68.14 | +0.01% | 612.9B | 20.90 | $3.25 | +0.84% |
| TCTZF | $68.35 | +0.23% | 610.2B | 21.01 | $3.22 | +0.85% |
| PROSY | $10.38 | +0.97% | 115.9B | 9.03 | $1.15 | +0.29% |
| PROSF | $49.30 | +0.00% | 107.8B | 8.54 | $5.77 | +0.47% |
| BAIDF | $16.90 | -7.65% | 45.3B | 11.84 | $1.41 | N/A |
| NAPRF | $56.84 | +0.00% | 41B | 7.91 | $6.75 | +0.55% |
| KUASF | $8.74 | -5.05% | 38.1B | 16.79 | $0.53 | +0.66% |
| KSHTY | $1.74 | -0.86% | 36.9B | 15.70 | $0.11 | +0.53% |
| YAHOF | $2.60 | +0.00% | 17.8B | 14.44 | $0.18 | +1.77% |
Stock Comparison
FMHS vs TCEHY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 612.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while TCEHY trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check TCEHY's competition here
FMHS vs TCTZF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 610.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while TCTZF trades at $68.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check TCTZF's competition here
FMHS vs PROSY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while PROSY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PROSY's competition here
FMHS vs PROSF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while PROSF trades at $49.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and PROSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PROSF's competition here
FMHS vs BAIDF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while BAIDF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAIDF's competition here
FMHS vs NAPRF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while NAPRF trades at $56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and NAPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAPRF's competition here
FMHS vs KUASF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while KUASF trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and KUASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUASF's competition here
FMHS vs KSHTY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while KSHTY trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check KSHTY's competition here
FMHS vs YAHOF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while YAHOF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAHOF's competition here
FMHS vs NHNCF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NHNCF's competition here
FMHS vs RPGRF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RPGRF trades at $124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and RPGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPGRF's competition here
FMHS vs RPGRY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RPGRY trades at $28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RPGRY's competition here
FMHS vs ADEVF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVF's competition here
FMHS vs ADEVY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVY's competition here
FMHS vs NPSNY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while NPSNY trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NPSNY's competition here
FMHS vs CSXXY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CSXXY trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSXXY's competition here
FMHS vs ATDRY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ATDRY trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ATDRY's competition here
FMHS vs ATDRF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ATDRF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ATDRF's competition here
FMHS vs SKLTF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SKLTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKLTF's competition here
FMHS vs CHLLF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CHLLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 238.93. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CHLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHLLF's competition here
FMHS vs RTMVY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RTMVY trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RTMVY's competition here
FMHS vs RTMVF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RTMVF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTMVF's competition here
FMHS vs MEIUF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MEIUF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and MEIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEIUF's competition here
FMHS vs KKKUF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while KKKUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and KKKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KKKUF's competition here
FMHS vs DHGAF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check DHGAF's competition here
FMHS vs HMNTY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while HMNTY trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check HMNTY's competition here
FMHS vs PRSNF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 914.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while PRSNF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -33.12. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PRSNF's competition here
FMHS vs MLRYY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLRYY's competition here
FMHS vs XINXF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XINXF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XINXF's competition here
FMHS vs ADBMF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBMF's competition here
FMHS vs WNWSF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and WNWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNWSF's competition here
FMHS vs ZGXNF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ZGXNF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ZGXNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZGXNF's competition here
FMHS vs FRRGF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRGF's competition here
FMHS vs MECVF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MECVF's competition here
FMHS vs NXCLF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while NXCLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXCLF's competition here
FMHS vs UUMMF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UUMMF's competition here
FMHS vs TGRVF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGRVF's competition here
FMHS vs RSTN Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSTN's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RSTN's competition here
FMHS vs CPADF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CPADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPADF's competition here
FMHS vs ZMDTF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ZMDTF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ZMDTF's competition here
FMHS vs CKPDY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CKPDY trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CKPDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKPDY's competition here
FMHS vs OPNDF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while OPNDF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and OPNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPNDF's competition here
FMHS vs PXSTF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check PXSTF's competition here
FMHS vs MSEZ Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MSEZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of -13.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSEZ's competition here
FMHS vs RDLYF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDLYF's competition here
FMHS vs NIROF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while NIROF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and NIROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIROF's competition here
FMHS vs SABOF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SABOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SABOF's competition here
FMHS vs BBUZ Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while BBUZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and BBUZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBUZ's competition here
FMHS vs HYPPF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while HYPPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and HYPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYPPF's competition here
FMHS vs APMLF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMLF's competition here
FMHS vs DGTHF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while DGTHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and DGTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGTHF's competition here
FMHS vs BBTVF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BBTVF's competition here
FMHS vs EGLXF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while EGLXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and EGLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGLXF's competition here
FMHS vs QQQFF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while QQQFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QQQFF's competition here
FMHS vs GIFX Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while GIFX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and GIFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIFX's competition here
FMHS vs LBUY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LBUY's competition here
FMHS vs YOOIF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while YOOIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOOIF's competition here
FMHS vs NUGL Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check NUGL's competition here
FMHS vs GOGY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and GOGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GOGY's competition here
FMHS vs SEEK Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SEEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEEK's competition here
FMHS vs LTCP Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while LTCP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTCP's competition here
FMHS vs BMTM Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 892.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while BMTM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and BMTM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMTM's competition here
FMHS vs MRPT Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 826.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MRPT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and MRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRPT's competition here
FMHS vs MRNJ Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and MRNJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRNJ's competition here
FMHS vs SFUNY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 722.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SFUNY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SFUNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFUNY's competition here
FMHS vs SPFYF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 722.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SPFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPFYF's competition here
FMHS vs ILIM Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 684.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ILIM's competition here
FMHS vs OOOOF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 599.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check OOOOF's competition here
FMHS vs CYAP Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYAP's competition here
FMHS vs VMSI Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 578.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMSI's competition here
FMHS vs RBDC Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and RBDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBDC's competition here
FMHS vs LHGI Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 494K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LHGI's competition here
FMHS vs LKST Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 243.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and LKST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKST's competition here
FMHS vs KIWB Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check KIWB's competition here
FMHS vs ZONX Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +28.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ZONX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZONX's competition here
FMHS vs OTTV Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTTV's competition here
FMHS vs QTTOY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 42.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while QTTOY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTTOY's competition here
FMHS vs SLNM Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SLNM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLNM's competition here
FMHS vs RWRDP Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and RWRDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWRDP's competition here
FMHS vs HUTN Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 25.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUTN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUTN's competition here
FMHS vs DELCF Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and DELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELCF's competition here
FMHS vs MDAW Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 14.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check MDAW's competition here
FMHS vs BTIM Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check BTIM's competition here
FMHS vs REDFY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDFY's competition here
FMHS vs CRTDW Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRTDW's competition here
FMHS vs PIKL Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIKL's competition here
FMHS vs ISHM Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISHM's competition here
FMHS vs SHGY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGY's competition here
FMHS vs LOCM Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOCM's competition here
FMHS vs ROII Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROII's competition here
FMHS vs LOVLQ Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check LOVLQ's competition here
FMHS vs ZZLL Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check ZZLL's competition here
FMHS vs FRFR Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and FRFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRFR's competition here
FMHS vs INTH Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTH's competition here
FMHS vs DATI Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and DATI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DATI's competition here
FMHS vs ABBY Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and ABBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABBY's competition here
FMHS vs RAIO Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMHS.Check RAIO's competition here
FMHS vs YITD Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and YITD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YITD's competition here
FMHS vs CYZN Comparison February 2026
FMHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMHS stands at 1.8M. In comparison, CYZN has a market cap of 279. Regarding current trading prices, FMHS is priced at $0.10, while CYZN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMHS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CYZN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FMHS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYZN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FMHS and CYZN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYZN's competition here