Franklin FTSE South Africa ETF
Franklin FTSE South Africa ETF FLZA Peers
See (FLZA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLZA | $19.58 | +0.54% | 2M | 8.17 | $2.40 | N/A |
| VFINX | $559.18 | +0.38% | 1.4T | 26.33 | $21.24 | +1.27% |
| VOO | $548.80 | -1.11% | 1.4T | 26.04 | $21.07 | +1.27% |
| VITSX | $144.62 | +0.31% | 1.2T | 25.58 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $144.60 | +0.31% | 1.2T | 25.59 | $5.65 | +0.01% |
| FXAIX | $210.41 | +0.39% | 638B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $293.55 | -1.19% | 608.7B | 25.29 | $11.61 | +1.28% |
| IVV | $599.77 | -1.11% | 588.6B | 25.81 | $23.24 | +1.02% |
| SPY | $596.95 | -1.13% | 547.9B | 24.77 | $24.10 | +1.20% |
| VTSNX | $147.87 | +0.57% | 495.9B | 16.48 | $8.97 | +2.87% |
Stock Comparison
FLZA vs VFINX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VFINX trades at $559.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VOO Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VOO trades at $548.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VITSX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VITSX trades at $144.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTSAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTSAX trades at $144.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FXAIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 638B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FXAIX trades at $210.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTI Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 608.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTI trades at $293.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs IVV Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 588.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while IVV trades at $599.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs SPY Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 547.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while SPY trades at $596.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTSNX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 495.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTSNX trades at $147.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VXUS Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 491.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VXUS trades at $67.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VMCPX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 344.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VMCPX trades at $370.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VIMAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 316.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VIMAX trades at $339.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VIIIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 308.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VIIIX trades at $492.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VINIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 308.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VINIX trades at $492.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RGAGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 281B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RGAGX trades at $79.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs GAFFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 280.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while GAFFX trades at $79.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AGTHX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 280.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AGTHX trades at $79.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs GFAFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 277.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while GFAFX trades at $78.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RGABX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 249.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RGABX trades at $70.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RGAAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 245.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RGAAX trades at $69.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs BALFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 243.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while BALFX trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs ABALX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 243.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while ABALX trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RLBGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 241.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RLBGX trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AMBFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AMBFX trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AFMBX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AFMBX trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs GFACX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 239.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while GFACX trades at $67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VDIPX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 226.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VDIPX trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTMNX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 226.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTMNX trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VEA Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 224.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VEA trades at $56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs QQQ Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 207.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while QQQ trades at $526.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VB Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 202.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VB trades at $229.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTV Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 185.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTV trades at $173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VO Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 173.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VO trades at $271.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs BX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 161B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while BX trades at $136.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AICCX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AICCX trades at $60.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FCTDX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FCTDX trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AIVSX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AIVSX trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FCNKX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FCNKX trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FCNTX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FCNTX trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RICBX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RICBX trades at $60.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RICAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RICAX trades at $60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AICFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AICFX trades at $60.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs BLK Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 150.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while BLK trades at $971.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs NPFFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while NPFFX trades at $67.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RNPGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RNPGX trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FNPFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FNPFX trades at $68.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs ANWPX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while ANWPX trades at $68.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs C-PN Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while C-PN trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AFIFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AFIFX trades at $85.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs ANCFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while ANCFX trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs CFNAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 141.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while CFNAX trades at $85.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AWSHX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AWSHX trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FWMIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FWMIX trades at $62.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RWMFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RWMFX trades at $62.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs CWMAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while CWMAX trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs WSHFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while WSHFX trades at $62.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs IEFA Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while IEFA trades at $83.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs WSHCX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while WSHCX trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RWMBX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RWMBX trades at $61.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AEPGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AEPGX trades at $59.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RERGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RERGX trades at $59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AEGFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AEGFX trades at $59.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RERHX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RERHX trades at $59.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AEPFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AEPFX trades at $59.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AGG Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AGG trades at $97.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 124.94. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs IWF Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while IWF trades at $405.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VWENX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 111.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VWENX trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VWELX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 111.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VWELX trades at $44.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs KKR Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while KKR trades at $121.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 52.30. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VSCIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VSCIX trades at $111.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs NAESX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while NAESX trades at $111.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs JLGRX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while JLGRX trades at $84.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs SEEGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while SEEGX trades at $81.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs JLGMX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while JLGMX trades at $85.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTTHX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTTHX trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs FSKAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while FSKAX trades at $165.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VDADX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VDADX trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VIG Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VIG trades at $200.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VUG Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VUG trades at $418.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VITAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VITAX trades at $324.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 37.34. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTHRX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTHRX trades at $40.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VGT Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VGT trades at $623.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs TBCIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while TBCIX trades at $195.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs TRBCX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while TRBCX trades at $193.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VFORX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VFORX trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VTIVX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VTIVX trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs BN Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while BN trades at $57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 199.34. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs PABGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while PABGX trades at $187.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs DODGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while DODGX trades at $268.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs IJH Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while IJH trades at $60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RAFFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RAFFX trades at $44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs BAM Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while BAM trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs RRBGX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while RRBGX trades at $174.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VIEIX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VIEIX trades at $143.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs VEMAX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while VEMAX trades at $40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs PRUFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while PRUFX trades at $107.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs AMCPX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while AMCPX trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs PRGFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while PRGFX trades at $107.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 38.41. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.
FLZA vs DODFX Comparison
FLZA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZA stands at 2M. In comparison, DODFX has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZA is priced at $19.58, while DODFX trades at $60.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.17, whereas DODFX's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FLZA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZA is more volatile compared to DODFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZA.