Société Foncière Lyonnaise

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GFC.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while GFC.PA trades at €94.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GFC.PA's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GFC.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to GFC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EIFF.PA has a market cap of 661.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while EIFF.PA trades at €4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas EIFF.PA's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIFF.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to EIFF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NSI.AS has a market cap of 452.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while NSI.AS trades at €23.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NSI.AS's P/E ratio is 37.54. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSI.AS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to NSI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INEA.PA has a market cap of 400.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while INEA.PA trades at €37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas INEA.PA's P/E ratio is -132.14. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INEA.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to INEA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VTR.PA has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while VTR.PA trades at €6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas VTR.PA's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTR.PA's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to VTR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MLMAB.PA has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while MLMAB.PA trades at €280.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas MLMAB.PA's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLMAB.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is more volatile compared to MLMAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ACAN.PA has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while ACAN.PA trades at €0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ACAN.PA's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACAN.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to ACAN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MHM.PA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while MHM.PA trades at €0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas MHM.PA's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MHM.PA's ROE of +2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to MHM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BEFB.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while BEFB.BR trades at €46.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas BEFB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEFB.BR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to BEFB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LEAS.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while LEAS.BR trades at €72.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas LEAS.BR's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LEAS.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to LEAS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HBRN.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while HBRN.IR trades at €1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HBRN.IR's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBRN.IR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is more volatile compared to HBRN.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.

FLY.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLY.PA stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FPN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLY.PA is priced at €73.40, while FPN.PA trades at €0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLY.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas FPN.PA's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, FLY.PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPN.PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLY.PA is less volatile compared to FPN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLY.PA.