Flutter Entertainment plc
Flutter Entertainment plc FLTR.L Peers
See (FLTR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLTR.L | £22,300.00 | -0.58% | 40.3B | 108.15 | £2.11 | N/A |
| 0A37.L | £163.85 | -17.09% | 27.5B | 224.99 | £0.75 | +5.08% |
| 0ABA.L | £37.05 | +1.20% | 18.4B | -9.14 | -£4.05 | N/A |
| 0JWC.L | £37.55 | -0.27% | 10.3B | 12.00 | £3.14 | N/A |
| ENT.L | £959.00 | +0.38% | 6.1B | -13.34 | -£0.71 | +1.45% |
| 0LK3.L | £160.14 | +0.57% | 5.9B | 20.42 | £7.75 | +7.02% |
| 0EAW.L | £188.69 | +0.00% | 4B | 160.58 | £1.18 | N/A |
| 0O80.L | £106.00 | +0.47% | 2.5B | 346.67 | £0.30 | +1.44% |
| PTEC.L | £385.00 | -1.28% | 1.2B | 24.06 | £0.16 | +78.26% |
| RNK.L | £156.60 | +9.21% | 689.5M | 21.03 | £0.07 | +1.02% |
Stock Comparison
FLTR.L vs 0A37.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0A37.L has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0A37.L trades at £163.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0A37.L's P/E ratio is 224.99. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0A37.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 0A37.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 0ABA.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0ABA.L has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0ABA.L trades at £37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0ABA.L's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0ABA.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 0ABA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 0JWC.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0JWC.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0JWC.L trades at £37.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0JWC.L's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0JWC.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 0JWC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs ENT.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ENT.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while ENT.L trades at £959.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas ENT.L's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENT.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to ENT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 0LK3.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0LK3.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0LK3.L trades at £160.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0LK3.L's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0LK3.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 0LK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 0EAW.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0EAW.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0EAW.L trades at £188.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0EAW.L's P/E ratio is 160.58. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0EAW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 0EAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 0O80.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0O80.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0O80.L trades at £106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0O80.L's P/E ratio is 346.67. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0O80.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 0O80.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs PTEC.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PTEC.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while PTEC.L trades at £385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas PTEC.L's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTEC.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to PTEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs RNK.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RNK.L has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while RNK.L trades at £156.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas RNK.L's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNK.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is less volatile compared to RNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 888.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 888.L has a market cap of 383.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 888.L trades at £85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 888.L's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 888.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to 888.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs EVOK.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, EVOK.L has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while EVOK.L trades at £61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas EVOK.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVOK.L's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is less volatile compared to EVOK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs GMR.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GMR.L has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while GMR.L trades at £53.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas GMR.L's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMR.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is less volatile compared to GMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs BOTB.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BOTB.L has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while BOTB.L trades at £532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas BOTB.L's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOTB.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to BOTB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs B90.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, B90.L has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while B90.L trades at £2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas B90.L's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to B90.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is less volatile compared to B90.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs CMX.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CMX.L has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while CMX.L trades at £57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas CMX.L's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to CMX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs SPO.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SPO.L has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while SPO.L trades at £84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas SPO.L's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPO.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FLTR.L has daily volatility of 5.51 and SPO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FLTR.L vs TNT.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TNT.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while TNT.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas TNT.L's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNT.L's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FLTR.L has daily volatility of 5.51 and TNT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FLTR.L vs MIN.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MIN.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while MIN.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas MIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to MIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs WEB.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, WEB.L has a market cap of 295K. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while WEB.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas WEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEB.L's ROE of -25.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is less volatile compared to WEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs 0SYQ.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, 0SYQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while 0SYQ.L trades at £9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas 0SYQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0SYQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is less volatile compared to 0SYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.
FLTR.L vs GYS.L Comparison
FLTR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLTR.L stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GYS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLTR.L is priced at £22,300.00, while GYS.L trades at £1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLTR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 108.15, whereas GYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, FLTR.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GYS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLTR.L is more volatile compared to GYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLTR.L.