Fluor Corporation
Fluor Corporation FLRAP Peers
See (FLRAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLRAP | $1,763.28 | +4.69% | 251.5B | -735.01 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| ACSAY | $13.38 | +1.93% | 85.2B | 17.84 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BOUYY | $8.71 | +0.69% | 82.7B | 13.61 | $0.64 | +5.20% |
| VCISF | $144.85 | +2.00% | 81.5B | 14.98 | $9.67 | +3.69% |
| VCISY | $35.92 | +0.43% | 80.8B | 14.84 | $2.42 | +3.81% |
| LTOUF | $48.68 | +0.00% | 67B | 38.33 | $1.27 | +0.78% |
| WSPOF | $199.42 | -0.26% | 26B | 49.98 | $3.99 | +0.54% |
| CRWOF | $0.48 | +5.56% | 17.9B | 3.39 | $0.14 | +6.20% |
| ACSAF | $66.70 | +0.00% | 17B | 17.65 | $3.78 | +3.08% |
| BOUYF | $44.23 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 13.78 | $3.21 | +5.13% |
Stock Comparison
FLRAP vs ACSAY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ACSAY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BOUYY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BOUYY trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs VCISF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while VCISF trades at $144.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to VCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs VCISY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while VCISY trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs LTOUF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, LTOUF has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while LTOUF trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas LTOUF's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LTOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to LTOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs WSPOF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while WSPOF trades at $199.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CRWOF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CRWOF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ACSAF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ACSAF trades at $66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ACSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BOUYF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BOUYF trades at $44.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs HOCFF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while HOCFF trades at $189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to HOCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs EFGSY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while EFGSY trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs EFGSF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to EFGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs KAJMF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while KAJMF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SNCAF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SNCAF trades at $68.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to SNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs KAJMY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while KAJMY trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs OBYCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while OBYCF trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs STBBF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while STBBF trades at $92.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to STBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs TISCY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while TISCY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SKBSY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SKBSY trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ACXIF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ACXIF trades at $171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SKSBF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SKSBF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to SKSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CCOHF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CCOHF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs AVHNF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to AVHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BCKIY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BCKIY trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to BCKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BCKIF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BCKIF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SHMUY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SHMUY trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs TISCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while TISCF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to TISCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs EKIVF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs AVHNY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ARCAY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ARCAY trades at $50.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs RBWNY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to RBWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ARCVF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ARCVF trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PUODY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PUODY trades at $226.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to PUODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs IMPJY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while IMPJY trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SHMUF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ABGOF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs AGOAF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PYOIF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs NWSGY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while NWSGY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs MLLUY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while MLLUY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BFLBF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BFLBF trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BAFBF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BAFBF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to BAFBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BFLBY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BFLBY trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BFLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs NWSZF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while NWSZF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SENGF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SENGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PYYIF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to PYYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs OPMXF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while OPMXF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 44.42. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BAFYY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SYRVF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PTJSY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs JGCCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs AFXXF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs GKTRF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs JGCCY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while JGCCY trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -795.50. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to JGCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PTJSF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SKBNF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PNOCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to PNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs AGRUF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to AGRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs TNISY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while TNISY trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs TNISF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while TNISF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to TNISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs KBAGF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while KBAGF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to KBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs KLRGF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while KLRGF trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs HAZAF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BIRDF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BIRDF trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BIRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BADFF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BADFF trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to BADFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs KIERF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while KIERF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CKOCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to CKOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs MOPHY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to MOPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ELLKY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs AEGXF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 921.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while AEGXF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs YITYY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while YITYY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to YITYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs RNWHF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to RNWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs TKFHY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 559M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ELLKF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CHYCY Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SLAAF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SLAAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CHYCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to CHYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs OBSJF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ELWSF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ELWSF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs YRCCF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CSGQF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CSGQF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to CSGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs LYOPF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BRAGF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BRAGF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs HUKEF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs DBMG Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while DBMG trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to DBMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BRANF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BRANF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BRANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs BILBF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while BILBF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to BILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs KNNKF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to KNNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs APEUF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while APEUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 62.34. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to APEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs MURSF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while MURSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to MURSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs MRCR Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while MRCR trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to MRCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs LOUIF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to LOUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs GRHI Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while GRHI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs COLDF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while COLDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs CIPI Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while CIPI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs ETWLF Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to ETWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs SODE Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while SODE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is more volatile compared to SODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs PMDP Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while PMDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PMDP's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.
FLRAP vs RELT Comparison
FLRAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLRAP stands at 251.5B. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLRAP is priced at $1,763.28, while RELT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -735.01, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FLRAP's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RELT's ROE of +19.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLRAP is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLRAP.