FLSmidth & Co. A/S
FLSmidth & Co. A/S (FLIDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLIDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLIDF | $93.31 | +0.00% | 5B | 24.56 | $3.80 | +1.34% |
| RCIT | $2,262.50 | -0.06% | 295.8B | -226250.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SIEGY | $141.42 | +0.00% | 225.8B | 25.61 | $5.65 | +1.60% |
| SMAWF | $284.54 | +0.54% | 224.8B | 25.22 | $11.31 | +2.23% |
| SBGSY | $61.01 | +0.00% | 174.1B | 32.38 | $1.91 | +1.35% |
| SBGSF | $306.60 | +0.00% | 173.2B | 32.26 | $9.55 | +0.92% |
| SMERY | $192.73 | -0.03% | 168.3B | 75.88 | $2.56 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $194.11 | -0.00% | 166.7B | 76.44 | $2.55 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $193.96 | +6.37% | 165.9B | 101.55 | $1.91 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $8.76 | -0.03% | 127.2B | 34.60 | $0.25 | +0.73% |
Stock Comparison
FLIDF vs RCIT Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 295.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while RCIT trades at $2,262.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -226250.00. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check RCIT's competition here
FLIDF vs SIEGY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 225.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SIEGY trades at $141.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SIEGY's competition here
FLIDF vs SMAWF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 224.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMAWF trades at $284.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMAWF's competition here
FLIDF vs SBGSY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SBGSY trades at $61.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SBGSY's competition here
FLIDF vs SBGSF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 173.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SBGSF trades at $306.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SBGSF's competition here
FLIDF vs SMERY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMERY has a market cap of 168.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMERY trades at $192.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMERY's P/E ratio is 75.88. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMERY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMERY's competition here
FLIDF vs SMEGF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMEGF trades at $194.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 76.44. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMEGF's competition here
FLIDF vs SMNEY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMNEY trades at $193.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 101.55. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMNEY's competition here
FLIDF vs WRTBY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WRTBY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check WRTBY's competition here
FLIDF vs MHVYF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while MHVYF trades at $31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 60.75. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check MHVYF's competition here
FLIDF vs ATLKY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ATLKY trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check ATLKY's competition here
FLIDF vs ATLCY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ATLCY trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check ATLCY's competition here
FLIDF vs ATLPF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ATLPF trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and ATLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATLPF's competition here
FLIDF vs ATLFF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ATLFF trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and ATLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATLFF's competition here
FLIDF vs KNYJY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while KNYJY trades at $36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check KNYJY's competition here
FLIDF vs AMDLY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, AMDLY has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while AMDLY trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas AMDLY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMDLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and AMDLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMDLY's competition here
FLIDF vs SDVKY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SDVKY trades at $41.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SDVKY's competition here
FLIDF vs SDVKF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SDVKF trades at $42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SDVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDVKF's competition here
FLIDF vs SHLAF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SHLAF trades at $410.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SHLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLAF's competition here
FLIDF vs WEGZY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WEGZY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check WEGZY's competition here
FLIDF vs SHLRF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SHLRF trades at $362.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SHLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHLRF's competition here
FLIDF vs FANUF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while FANUF trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check FANUF's competition here
FLIDF vs FANUY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while FANUY trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check FANUY's competition here
FLIDF vs KNYJF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while KNYJF trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and KNYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNYJF's competition here
FLIDF vs WEICF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WEICF trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check WEICF's competition here
FLIDF vs SMCAY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMCAY trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMCAY's competition here
FLIDF vs SMECF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMECF trades at $455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMECF's competition here
FLIDF vs IHICY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while IHICY trades at $26.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check IHICY's competition here
FLIDF vs WRTBF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WRTBF trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and WRTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRTBF's competition here
FLIDF vs VWSYF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while VWSYF trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check VWSYF's competition here
FLIDF vs IHICF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while IHICF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and IHICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHICF's competition here
FLIDF vs VWDRY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while VWDRY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check VWDRY's competition here
FLIDF vs ALFVF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ALFVF trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and ALFVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALFVF's competition here
FLIDF vs ALFVY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ALFVY trades at $57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check ALFVY's competition here
FLIDF vs VACNY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while VACNY trades at $67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 70.38. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check VACNY's competition here
FLIDF vs KWHIY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while KWHIY trades at $44.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check KWHIY's competition here
FLIDF vs KWHIF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while KWHIF trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and KWHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWHIF's competition here
FLIDF vs EBCOF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while EBCOF trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and EBCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBCOF's competition here
FLIDF vs EBCOY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while EBCOY trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check EBCOY's competition here
FLIDF vs NNDNF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NNDNF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and NNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNDNF's competition here
FLIDF vs DAIUF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while DAIUF trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and DAIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAIUF's competition here
FLIDF vs DFKCY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while DFKCY trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check DFKCY's competition here
FLIDF vs DNGFF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while DNGFF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and DNGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNGFF's competition here
FLIDF vs WEICY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEICY's competition here
FLIDF vs NJDCY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NJDCY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check NJDCY's competition here
FLIDF vs VTTGF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while VTTGF trades at $463.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and VTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTTGF's competition here
FLIDF vs GCTAF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCTAF's competition here
FLIDF vs GCTAY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check GCTAY's competition here
FLIDF vs WEGRY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WEGRY trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check WEGRY's competition here
FLIDF vs WEIGF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while WEIGF trades at $46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check WEIGF's competition here
FLIDF vs SMGZY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMGZY trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SMGZY's competition here
FLIDF vs SMGKF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SMGKF trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SMGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMGKF's competition here
FLIDF vs MLSPF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while MLSPF trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check MLSPF's competition here
FLIDF vs GEAGF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while GEAGF trades at $69.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and GEAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEAGF's competition here
FLIDF vs RTLLF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while RTLLF trades at $881.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check RTLLF's competition here
FLIDF vs NRDXF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NRDXF trades at $40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 75.91. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and NRDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRDXF's competition here
FLIDF vs NRXXY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NRXXY trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 71.52. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and NRXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXXY's competition here
FLIDF vs RATIY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while RATIY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and RATIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RATIY's competition here
FLIDF vs SIELF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SIELF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SIELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIELF's competition here
FLIDF vs YOKEY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while YOKEY trades at $69.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and YOKEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOKEY's competition here
FLIDF vs TBABF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and TBABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBABF's competition here
FLIDF vs YOKEF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while YOKEF trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and YOKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOKEF's competition here
FLIDF vs IMIAF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while IMIAF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and IMIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMIAF's competition here
FLIDF vs SPXSF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SPXSF trades at $105.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SPXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPXSF's competition here
FLIDF vs SPXSY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SPXSY trades at $53.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check SPXSY's competition here
FLIDF vs XJNGF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while XJNGF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and XJNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XJNGF's competition here
FLIDF vs NGKIF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NGKIF trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and NGKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGKIF's competition here
FLIDF vs SULZF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SULZF trades at $188.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SULZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SULZF's competition here
FLIDF vs VLMTY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while VLMTY trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and VLMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLMTY's competition here
FLIDF vs FCHRF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while FCHRF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and FCHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCHRF's competition here
FLIDF vs VOYJF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while VOYJF trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOYJF's competition here
FLIDF vs FLUIF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while FLUIF trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and FLUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLUIF's competition here
FLIDF vs FLIDY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while FLIDY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and FLIDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLIDY's competition here
FLIDF vs JPSWY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while JPSWY trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check JPSWY's competition here
FLIDF vs HSHIF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while HSHIF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and HSHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSHIF's competition here
FLIDF vs HSHZY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while HSHZY trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and HSHZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSHZY's competition here
FLIDF vs MICLF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while MICLF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and MICLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICLF's competition here
FLIDF vs BCHHF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while BCHHF trades at $444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and BCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHHF's competition here
FLIDF vs YMATF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while YMATF trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and YMATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMATF's competition here
FLIDF vs HAIIF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while HAIIF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIIF's competition here
FLIDF vs SFSLF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFSLF's competition here
FLIDF vs AALBF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while AALBF trades at $40.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and AALBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AALBF's competition here
FLIDF vs SOHVY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SOHVY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SOHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHVY's competition here
FLIDF vs KRNNF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and KRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNNF's competition here
FLIDF vs CYJBF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while CYJBF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and CYJBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYJBF's competition here
FLIDF vs RTOXF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while RTOXF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and RTOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOXF's competition here
FLIDF vs ATSAF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATSAF's competition here
FLIDF vs CYJBY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, CYJBY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while CYJBY trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas CYJBY's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYJBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and CYJBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYJBY's competition here
FLIDF vs THKLY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while THKLY trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 56.48. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THKLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check THKLY's competition here
FLIDF vs NCTKY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NCTKY trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and NCTKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCTKY's competition here
FLIDF vs SOHVF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while SOHVF trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is -175.18. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and SOHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHVF's competition here
FLIDF vs MRRLF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check MRRLF's competition here
FLIDF vs THKLF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while THKLF trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THKLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and THKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THKLF's competition here
FLIDF vs JGHAF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while JGHAF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and JGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHAF's competition here
FLIDF vs NCTKF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while NCTKF trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and NCTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCTKF's competition here
FLIDF vs KUKAF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUKAF's competition here
FLIDF vs AMDWF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and AMDWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMDWF's competition here
FLIDF vs FJTCY Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while FJTCY trades at $35.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF and FJTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJTCY's competition here
FLIDF vs HSYDF Comparison February 2026
FLIDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLIDF stands at 5B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLIDF is priced at $93.31, while HSYDF trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLIDF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.56, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is 91.25. In terms of profitability, FLIDF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLIDF is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLIDF.Check HSYDF's competition here