Fold Holdings Inc

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, GBTC has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while GBTC trades at $88.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas GBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to GBTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check GBTC's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, FBTC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while FBTC trades at $98.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas FBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to FBTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check FBTC's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, ARKB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while ARKB trades at $37.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas ARKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARKB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to ARKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check ARKB's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BITB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BITB trades at $61.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BITB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BITB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BITB's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BITO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BITO trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BITO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BITO's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, HODL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while HODL trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas HODL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HODL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to HODL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check HODL's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, ETH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while ETH trades at $32.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas ETH's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to ETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check ETH's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 617.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while CNCK trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check CNCK's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BRRR has a market cap of 611.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BRRR trades at $31.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BRRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BRRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BRRR's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BTCFX has a market cap of 556.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BTCFX trades at $29.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BTCFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BTCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BTCFX's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, FDIG has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while FDIG trades at $35.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas FDIG's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FDIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to FDIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check FDIG's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, WGMI has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while WGMI trades at $23.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas WGMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WGMI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to WGMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check WGMI's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, CRPT has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while CRPT trades at $21.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas CRPT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to CRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check CRPT's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, STCE has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while STCE trades at $51.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas STCE's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to STCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check STCE's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, IBLC has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while IBLC trades at $39.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas IBLC's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IBLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to IBLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check IBLC's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BTF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BTF trades at $15.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BTF's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BITC has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BITC trades at $49.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BITC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BITC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BITC's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BCDF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BCDF trades at $31.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BCDF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BCDF's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, DEFI has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while DEFI trades at $128.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas DEFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DEFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to DEFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check DEFI's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, SATO has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while SATO trades at $19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas SATO's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SATO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to SATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check SATO's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BTCC has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BTCC trades at $34.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BTCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BTCC's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, NFTZ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while NFTZ trades at $6.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas NFTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to NFTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check NFTZ's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, ARKD has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while ARKD trades at $56.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas ARKD's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARKD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to ARKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check ARKD's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BLKC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BLKC trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BLKC's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLKC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to BLKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BLKC's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, DAM has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while DAM trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas DAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to DAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check DAM's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, BTCR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while BTCR trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas BTCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTCR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is less volatile compared to BTCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check BTCR's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, VBB has a market cap of 859.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while VBB trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas VBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VBB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to VBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check VBB's competition here

FLD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLD stands at 199.4M. In comparison, CRYP has a market cap of 401K. Regarding current trading prices, FLD is priced at $4.27, while CRYP trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLD currently has a P/E ratio of -3.95, whereas CRYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLD's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRYP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLD is more volatile compared to CRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLD.Check CRYP's competition here