Franklin Bissett Core Plus Bond Act ETF
Franklin Bissett Core Plus Bond Act ETF FLCP.TO Peers
See (FLCP.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCP.TO | CA$17.94 | -0.33% | 2.8B | 15.55 | CA$1.15 | +3.58% |
| ZAG.TO | CA$13.88 | +0.51% | 11B | N/A | N/A | +3.96% |
| VAB.TO | CA$23.16 | +0.35% | 5.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.47% |
| ZST.TO | CA$49.01 | +0.04% | 4.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.18% |
| ZFL.TO | CA$12.59 | +1.04% | 3.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.38% |
| HBB.TO | CA$49.59 | +0.43% | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZIC.TO | CA$18.06 | -0.17% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.26% |
| ZMU.TO | CA$12.79 | +0.39% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.40% |
| NSCB.TO | CA$22.50 | -0.49% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.90% |
| ZCPB.TO | CA$28.02 | +0.25% | 2.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
FLCP.TO vs ZAG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZAG.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZAG.TO trades at CA$13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZAG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs VAB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VAB.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while VAB.TO trades at CA$23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas VAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to VAB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZST.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZST.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZST.TO trades at CA$49.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZST.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZST.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZST.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZFL.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZFL.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZFL.TO trades at CA$12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZFL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZFL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HBB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HBB.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HBB.TO trades at CA$49.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to HBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZIC.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZIC.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZIC.TO trades at CA$18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZIC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZMU.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZMU.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZMU.TO trades at CA$12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZMU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZMU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs NSCB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NSCB.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while NSCB.TO trades at CA$22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas NSCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to NSCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZCPB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZCPB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZCPB.TO trades at CA$28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZCPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZCPB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XSB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XSB.TO trades at CA$26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XSB.TO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to XSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs TDB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TDB.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while TDB.TO trades at CA$13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to TDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs PCOR.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PCOR.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while PCOR.TO trades at CA$18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas PCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to PCOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZCM.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZCM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZCM.TO trades at CA$15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZCM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs NHYB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NHYB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while NHYB.TO trades at CA$22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas NHYB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHYB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to NHYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs CAGG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CAGG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while CAGG.TO trades at CA$44.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CAGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to CAGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZJK.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZJK.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZJK.TO trades at CA$18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZJK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZJK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZJK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs FCGB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCGB.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while FCGB.TO trades at CA$21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FCGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to FCGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs VSC.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VSC.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while VSC.TO trades at CA$24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas VSC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to VSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs QBB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QBB.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while QBB.TO trades at CA$94.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas QBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to QBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZHY.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZHY.TO has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZHY.TO trades at CA$11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RQO.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RQO.TO has a market cap of 914.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RQO.TO trades at CA$18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RQO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RQO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZDB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZDB.TO has a market cap of 800.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZDB.TO trades at CA$15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RQP.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RQP.TO has a market cap of 735.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RQP.TO trades at CA$18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RQP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RQP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs CBO.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CBO.TO has a market cap of 726.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while CBO.TO trades at CA$18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to CBO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs CLG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CLG.TO has a market cap of 706.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while CLG.TO trades at CA$17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CLG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO and CLG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.17).
FLCP.TO vs FGO.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FGO.TO has a market cap of 617.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while FGO.TO trades at CA$10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FGO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to FGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs IGB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IGB.TO has a market cap of 616.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while IGB.TO trades at CA$18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas IGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to IGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RQN.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RQN.TO has a market cap of 575M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RQN.TO trades at CA$20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RQN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RQN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs QUIG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QUIG.TO has a market cap of 523.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while QUIG.TO trades at CA$85.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas QUIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to QUIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZLC.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZLC.TO has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZLC.TO trades at CA$15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZLC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZLC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XQB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XQB.TO has a market cap of 472M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XQB.TO trades at CA$19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to XQB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZFS.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZFS.TO has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZFS.TO trades at CA$13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZFS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZFS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HFR.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HFR.TO has a market cap of 443.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HFR.TO trades at CA$10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HFR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to HFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HTB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HTB.TO has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HTB.TO trades at CA$58.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to HTB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs TCLB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TCLB.TO has a market cap of 422.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while TCLB.TO trades at CA$116.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TCLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to TCLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs VCB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VCB.TO has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while VCB.TO trades at CA$24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas VCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to VCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZMP.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZMP.TO has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZMP.TO trades at CA$14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZMP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZPS.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZPS.TO has a market cap of 354M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZPS.TO trades at CA$12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZPS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZPS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZPL.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZPL.TO has a market cap of 310.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZPL.TO trades at CA$12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZPL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs TUHY.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TUHY.TO has a market cap of 294.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while TUHY.TO trades at CA$20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TUHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to TUHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs QEBH.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QEBH.TO has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while QEBH.TO trades at CA$79.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas QEBH.TO's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to QEBH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XRB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XRB.TO has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XRB.TO trades at CA$22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XRB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to XRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XIG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XIG.TO has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XIG.TO trades at CA$19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to XIG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs TCSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TCSB.TO has a market cap of 239.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while TCSB.TO trades at CA$14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TCSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to TCSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XHB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XHB.TO has a market cap of 216.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XHB.TO trades at CA$19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XHB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to XHB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XSAB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XSAB.TO has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XSAB.TO trades at CA$18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XSAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to XSAB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZCB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZCB.TO has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZCB.TO trades at CA$47.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RBO.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RBO.TO has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RBO.TO trades at CA$18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RBO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZSB.TO has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZSB.TO trades at CA$48.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs PTB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PTB.TO has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while PTB.TO trades at CA$19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas PTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to PTB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XSTB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XSTB.TO has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XSTB.TO trades at CA$19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XSTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to XSTB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RLB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RLB.TO has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RLB.TO trades at CA$18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs VGV.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VGV.TO has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while VGV.TO trades at CA$22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas VGV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to VGV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs DCG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DCG.TO has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while DCG.TO trades at CA$18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DCG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to DCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HBND.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HBND.TO has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HBND.TO trades at CA$13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HBND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to HBND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs FLCI.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FLCI.TO has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while FLCI.TO trades at CA$18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FLCI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLCI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to FLCI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ONEB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ONEB.TO has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ONEB.TO trades at CA$49.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ONEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ONEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs TULB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TULB.TO has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while TULB.TO trades at CA$108.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TULB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TULB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to TULB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZRR.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZRR.TO has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZRR.TO trades at CA$14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZRR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ZRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs DXO.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DXO.TO has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while DXO.TO trades at CA$19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DXO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to DXO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ESGB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ESGB.TO has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ESGB.TO trades at CA$27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ESGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ESGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ICPB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ICPB.TO has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ICPB.TO trades at CA$9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ICPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to ICPB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs QHY.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QHY.TO has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while QHY.TO trades at CA$83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas QHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to QHY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZMSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZMSB.TO has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZMSB.TO trades at CA$29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZMSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZMSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs CXF.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CXF.TO has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while CXF.TO trades at CA$10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to CXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs DRCU.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DRCU.TO has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while DRCU.TO trades at CA$18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DRCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRCU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to DRCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HAD.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HAD.TO has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HAD.TO trades at CA$9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HAD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to HAD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs BXF.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BXF.TO has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while BXF.TO trades at CA$10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas BXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to BXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs CMAR.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CMAR.TO has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while CMAR.TO trades at CA$18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CMAR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMAR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to CMAR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs FSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FSB.TO has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while FSB.TO trades at CA$9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to FSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs QSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QSB.TO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while QSB.TO trades at CA$99.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas QSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to QSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs QEBL.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QEBL.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while QEBL.TO trades at CA$79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas QEBL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to QEBL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs XEB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XEB.TO has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while XEB.TO trades at CA$15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas XEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to XEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ZQB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZQB.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ZQB.TO trades at CA$29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ZQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ZQB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RQG.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RQG.TO has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RQG.TO trades at CA$18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RQG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs ESGF.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ESGF.TO has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while ESGF.TO trades at CA$23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas ESGF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to ESGF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs DCS.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DCS.TO has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while DCS.TO trades at CA$19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to DCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RQI.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RQI.TO has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RQI.TO trades at CA$19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RQI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RQI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RQH.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RQH.TO has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RQH.TO trades at CA$19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RQH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RQH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs FGB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FGB.TO has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while FGB.TO trades at CA$18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to FGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs TUSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TUSB.TO has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while TUSB.TO trades at CA$14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas TUSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to TUSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs RPSB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RPSB.TO has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while RPSB.TO trades at CA$20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas RPSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to RPSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HTH.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HTH.TO has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HTH.TO trades at CA$54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HTH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to HTH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs DCC.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DCC.TO has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while DCC.TO trades at CA$19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas DCC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to DCC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HUIB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HUIB.TO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HUIB.TO trades at CA$19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HUIB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUIB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to HUIB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs SFIX.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SFIX.TO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while SFIX.TO trades at CA$20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas SFIX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFIX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is less volatile compared to SFIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs FLB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FLB.TO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while FLB.TO trades at CA$20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas FLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to FLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs CORP.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CORP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while CORP.TO trades at CA$20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas CORP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to CORP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs HMA.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HMA.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while HMA.TO trades at CA$10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas HMA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to HMA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.
FLCP.TO vs USB.TO Comparison
FLCP.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCP.TO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, USB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLCP.TO is priced at CA$17.94, while USB.TO trades at CA$21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCP.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.55, whereas USB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCP.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCP.TO is more volatile compared to USB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCP.TO.