Franklin Bissett Corporate Bond Active ETF
Franklin Bissett Corporate Bond Active ETF FLCI.TO Peers
See (FLCI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCI.TO | $18.02 | -0.33% | 99.19M | N/A | N/A | +4.33% |
ZAG.TO | $13.82 | -0.79% | 10.81B | N/A | N/A | +3.47% |
VAB.TO | $23.01 | -0.78% | 5.49B | N/A | N/A | +3.27% |
ZST.TO | $49.07 | +0.01% | 4.58B | N/A | N/A | +4.04% |
ZFL.TO | $12.53 | -1.84% | 3.43B | N/A | N/A | +3.18% |
HBB.TO | $49.15 | -0.81% | 3.36B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
ZMU.TO | $12.58 | -0.16% | 3.14B | N/A | N/A | +4.03% |
ZIC.TO | $18.13 | -0.28% | 3.11B | N/A | N/A | +3.92% |
NSCB.TO | $22.60 | -0.66% | 2.86B | N/A | N/A | +2.77% |
FLCP.TO | $17.87 | -0.67% | 2.81B | 15.49 | $1.15 | +3.51% |
Stock Comparison
FLCI.TO vs ZAG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZAG.TO has a market cap of 10.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZAG.TO trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs VAB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, VAB.TO has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while VAB.TO trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to VAB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZST.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZST.TO has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZST.TO trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZST.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZST.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZST.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZFL.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZFL.TO has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZFL.TO trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZFL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs HBB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HBB.TO has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HBB.TO trades at $49.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to HBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZMU.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZMU.TO has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZMU.TO trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZMU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZIC.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZIC.TO has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZIC.TO trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs NSCB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, NSCB.TO has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while NSCB.TO trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and NSCB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs FLCP.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, FLCP.TO has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while FLCP.TO trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLCP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to FLCP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZCPB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZCPB.TO has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZCPB.TO trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZCPB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XSB.TO has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XSB.TO trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSB.TO's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs TDB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, TDB.TO has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while TDB.TO trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to TDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs PCOR.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, PCOR.TO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while PCOR.TO trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to PCOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZCM.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZCM.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZCM.TO trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs NHYB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, NHYB.TO has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while NHYB.TO trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHYB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHYB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to NHYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs CAGG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, CAGG.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while CAGG.TO trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and CAGG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs ZJK.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZJK.TO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZJK.TO trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZJK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZJK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZJK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs FCGB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, FCGB.TO has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while FCGB.TO trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to FCGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs VSC.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, VSC.TO has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while VSC.TO trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to VSC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs QBB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, QBB.TO has a market cap of 998.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while QBB.TO trades at $93.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to QBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZHY.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZHY.TO has a market cap of 967.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZHY.TO trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs RQO.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RQO.TO has a market cap of 913.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RQO.TO trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to RQO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZDB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZDB.TO has a market cap of 787.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZDB.TO trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs RQP.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RQP.TO has a market cap of 733.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RQP.TO trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to RQP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs CBO.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, CBO.TO has a market cap of 722.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while CBO.TO trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to CBO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs CLG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, CLG.TO has a market cap of 699.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while CLG.TO trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to CLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs IGB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, IGB.TO has a market cap of 613.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while IGB.TO trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and IGB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs FGO.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, FGO.TO has a market cap of 612.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while FGO.TO trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to FGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs RQN.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RQN.TO has a market cap of 575.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RQN.TO trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to RQN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs QUIG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, QUIG.TO has a market cap of 516.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while QUIG.TO trades at $84.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to QUIG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZLC.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZLC.TO has a market cap of 476.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZLC.TO trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZLC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XQB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XQB.TO has a market cap of 465.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XQB.TO trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XQB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZFS.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZFS.TO has a market cap of 455.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZFS.TO trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZFS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs HFR.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HFR.TO has a market cap of 443.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HFR.TO trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to HFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs HTB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HTB.TO has a market cap of 441.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HTB.TO trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to HTB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs TCLB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, TCLB.TO has a market cap of 414.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while TCLB.TO trades at $116.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to TCLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs VCB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, VCB.TO has a market cap of 404.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while VCB.TO trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to VCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZMP.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZMP.TO has a market cap of 393.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZMP.TO trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZPS.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZPS.TO has a market cap of 351.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZPS.TO trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZPS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZPL.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZPL.TO has a market cap of 302.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZPL.TO trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs TUHY.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, TUHY.TO has a market cap of 292.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while TUHY.TO trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to TUHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs QEBH.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, QEBH.TO has a market cap of 260.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while QEBH.TO trades at $77.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QEBH.TO's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to QEBH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XRB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XRB.TO has a market cap of 253.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XRB.TO trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XIG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XIG.TO has a market cap of 239.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XIG.TO trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XIG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs TCSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, TCSB.TO has a market cap of 238.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while TCSB.TO trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to TCSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XHB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XHB.TO has a market cap of 215.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XHB.TO trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XHB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs FSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, FSB.TO has a market cap of 205.45M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while FSB.TO trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to FSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XSAB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XSAB.TO has a market cap of 185.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XSAB.TO trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XSAB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZCB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZCB.TO has a market cap of 153.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZCB.TO trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and ZCB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs RBO.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RBO.TO has a market cap of 137.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RBO.TO trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and RBO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs ZSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZSB.TO has a market cap of 132.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZSB.TO trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs PTB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, PTB.TO has a market cap of 121.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while PTB.TO trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to PTB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs RLB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RLB.TO has a market cap of 119.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RLB.TO trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and RLB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs XSTB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XSTB.TO has a market cap of 119.05M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XSTB.TO trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and XSTB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs VGV.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, VGV.TO has a market cap of 111.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while VGV.TO trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to VGV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs DCG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, DCG.TO has a market cap of 110.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while DCG.TO trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and DCG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs HBND.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HBND.TO has a market cap of 106.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HBND.TO trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to HBND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ONEB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ONEB.TO has a market cap of 93.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ONEB.TO trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and ONEB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs TULB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, TULB.TO has a market cap of 78.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while TULB.TO trades at $108.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TULB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TULB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and TULB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs ZRR.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZRR.TO has a market cap of 76.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZRR.TO trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZRR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs DXO.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, DXO.TO has a market cap of 76.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while DXO.TO trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to DXO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ESGB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ESGB.TO has a market cap of 73.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ESGB.TO trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and ESGB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs ICPB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ICPB.TO has a market cap of 62.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ICPB.TO trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ICPB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs QHY.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, QHY.TO has a market cap of 60.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while QHY.TO trades at $82.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to QHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs ZMSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZMSB.TO has a market cap of 56.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZMSB.TO trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and ZMSB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs CXF.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, CXF.TO has a market cap of 50.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while CXF.TO trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to CXF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs DRCU.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, DRCU.TO has a market cap of 45.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while DRCU.TO trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRCU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and DRCU.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs HAD.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HAD.TO has a market cap of 44.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HAD.TO trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and HAD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs BXF.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, BXF.TO has a market cap of 43.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while BXF.TO trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to BXF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs QSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, QSB.TO has a market cap of 40.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while QSB.TO trades at $99.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and QSB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs CMAR.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, CMAR.TO has a market cap of 38.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while CMAR.TO trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMAR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and CMAR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs QEBL.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, QEBL.TO has a market cap of 34.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while QEBL.TO trades at $77.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QEBL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and QEBL.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs ZQB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ZQB.TO has a market cap of 33.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ZQB.TO trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to ZQB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs XEB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, XEB.TO has a market cap of 33.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while XEB.TO trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to XEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs RQG.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RQG.TO has a market cap of 25.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RQG.TO trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and RQG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs ESGF.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, ESGF.TO has a market cap of 24.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while ESGF.TO trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and ESGF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs DCS.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, DCS.TO has a market cap of 19.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while DCS.TO trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and DCS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs RQI.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RQI.TO has a market cap of 18.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RQI.TO trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and RQI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs RQH.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RQH.TO has a market cap of 17.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RQH.TO trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and RQH.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs FGB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, FGB.TO has a market cap of 17.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while FGB.TO trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and FGB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs TUSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, TUSB.TO has a market cap of 14.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while TUSB.TO trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to TUSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs RPSB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, RPSB.TO has a market cap of 11.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while RPSB.TO trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and RPSB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs HTH.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HTH.TO has a market cap of 9.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HTH.TO trades at $54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and HTH.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs DCC.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, DCC.TO has a market cap of 7.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while DCC.TO trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to DCC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs HUIB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, HUIB.TO has a market cap of 5.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while HUIB.TO trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUIB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUIB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and HUIB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FLCI.TO vs SFIX.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, SFIX.TO has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while SFIX.TO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFIX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO is less volatile compared to SFIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLCI.TO.
FLCI.TO vs FLB.TO Comparison
FLCI.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLCI.TO stands at 99.19M. In comparison, FLB.TO has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FLCI.TO is priced at $18.02, while FLB.TO trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLCI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLCI.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLCI.TO and FLB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).