Fuji Media Holdings, Inc.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 59.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while CCZ trades at $62.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 53.17. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and CCZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while RGLXY trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while RGLXF trades at $33.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to RGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while ITVPY trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to ITVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while FJTNF trades at $17.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while ITVPF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TGNA trades at $17.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SGBAF has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SGBAF trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SGBAF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGBAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to SGBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while NMAX trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -39.11. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while BECVY trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and BECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TVAHF trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to TVAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while THDDY trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while MTPVY trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while PBSFY trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to PBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TVFCF trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and TVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while GETVF trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 922.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while FUBO trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 463.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while GTN trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 449.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while GTN-A trades at $7.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 429.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while STGYF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is -35.25. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STGYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 284.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while CURI trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -20.79. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 203.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SSP trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 174.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while IHRT trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 171.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while EVC trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 165.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TVBCY trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to TVBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 75.05M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SGA trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 55.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 43.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while MDIA trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 37.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while UONE trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 36.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SALM trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 34.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while UONEK trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 34.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SJ trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.05M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 21.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while XHLD trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 18.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while EMMS trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while AUD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 14.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while LUDG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to LUDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 9.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while BBGI trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 5.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while FHLD trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to FHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while AOECF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while CURIW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 3.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while LPTV trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while PEGX trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while INCT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while CMLS trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TLDE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 937627.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while SBSAA trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and SBSAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785317.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 658878.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while AITVF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648504.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TFBN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 574548.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TVTV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348127.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while PSRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 344996.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while TMGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and TMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155000.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while MEMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84769.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while FONU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59867.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while WTKN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9836.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while WNRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WNRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 525.00. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while MNIZ trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and MNIZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, QVCD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while QVCD trades at $8.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, GETVY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while GETVY trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, MCTZF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, ALLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while ALLN trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, QVCC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while QVCC trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.

FJTNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FJTNY stands at 4.55B. In comparison, DISCA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FJTNY is priced at $10.95, while DISCA trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FJTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, FJTNY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FJTNY is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FJTNY.