The Foschini Group Limited
The Foschini Group Limited (FHNGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FHNGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHNGY | $6.68 | +2.61% | 2.2B | 12.15 | $0.55 | +3.38% |
| BABAF | $15.63 | -1.21% | 298.2B | 16.62 | $0.94 | +1.58% |
| MPNGY | $32.61 | -1.33% | 99.4B | 20.55 | $1.58 | N/A |
| MPNGF | $17.04 | -3.20% | 94.2B | 21.57 | $0.79 | N/A |
| ANCTF | $53.50 | -1.38% | 50.7B | 19.74 | $2.71 | +1.00% |
| JDCMF | $16.50 | -2.22% | 47.6B | 8.01 | $2.06 | +2.96% |
| YAHOY | $7.32 | -4.87% | 25.2B | 25.10 | $0.29 | N/A |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | +0.00% | 23.4B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | N/A |
| RKUNF | $5.50 | +1.29% | 11.9B | -9.02 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| RKUNY | $5.38 | -2.54% | 11.6B | -8.82 | -$0.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FHNGY vs BABAF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 298.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BABAF trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check BABAF's competition here
FHNGY vs MPNGY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MPNGY trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MPNGY's competition here
FHNGY vs MPNGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MPNGF trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MPNGF's competition here
FHNGY vs ANCTF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ANCTF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ANCTF's competition here
FHNGY vs JDCMF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JDCMF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JDCMF's competition here
FHNGY vs YAHOY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while YAHOY trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check YAHOY's competition here
FHNGY vs XXLLY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check XXLLY's competition here
FHNGY vs RKUNF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while RKUNF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check RKUNF's competition here
FHNGY vs RKUNY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while RKUNY trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check RKUNY's competition here
FHNGY vs MTTRY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MTTRY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MTTRY's competition here
FHNGY vs SRTTY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SRTTY trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SRTTY's competition here
FHNGY vs NCLTF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while NCLTF trades at $88.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is -76.53. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check NCLTF's competition here
FHNGY vs NCLTY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while NCLTY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is -78.77. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check NCLTY's competition here
FHNGY vs SATLF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SATLF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SATLF's competition here
FHNGY vs SNROF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SNROF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SNROF's competition here
FHNGY vs DELHY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DELHY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DELHY's competition here
FHNGY vs HKTGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HKTGF trades at $207.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HKTGF's competition here
FHNGY vs MONOY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MONOY trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MONOY's competition here
FHNGY vs DLVHF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DLVHF trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DLVHF's competition here
FHNGY vs ZLDSF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ZLDSF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ZLDSF's competition here
FHNGY vs ZLNDY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ZLNDY trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ZLNDY's competition here
FHNGY vs CDNAF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while CDNAF trades at $138.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check CDNAF's competition here
FHNGY vs JBHIF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JBHIF trades at $69.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JBHIF's competition here
FHNGY vs DUFRY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DUFRY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 58.22. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DUFRY's competition here
FHNGY vs DFRYF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DFRYF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 60.47. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DFRYF's competition here
FHNGY vs PETRY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check PETRY's competition here
FHNGY vs CDNTF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while CDNTF trades at $186.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check CDNTF's competition here
FHNGY vs ELPQF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ELPQF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ELPQF's competition here
FHNGY vs ALEGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ALEGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ALEGF's competition here
FHNGY vs JDSPY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JDSPY trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JDSPY's competition here
FHNGY vs JDDSF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JDDSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JDDSF's competition here
FHNGY vs MONOF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MONOF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MONOF's competition here
FHNGY vs JUMSY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JUMSY trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JUMSY's competition here
FHNGY vs JTKWY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JTKWY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JTKWY's competition here
FHNGY vs TKAYF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while TKAYF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check TKAYF's competition here
FHNGY vs HNORY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HNORY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HNORY's competition here
FHNGY vs SDIPF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SDIPF trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SDIPF's competition here
FHNGY vs ZLPSF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ZLPSF's competition here
FHNGY vs JUMSF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check JUMSF's competition here
FHNGY vs ZOPLY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ZOPLY's competition here
FHNGY vs DROOF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DROOF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 60.25. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DROOF's competition here
FHNGY vs DNLMY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DNLMY trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DNLMY's competition here
FHNGY vs MRCIF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MRCIF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MRCIF's competition here
FHNGY vs MCARY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MCARY trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MCARY's competition here
FHNGY vs MTAGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MTAGF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is -45.09. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MTAGF's competition here
FHNGY vs YMDAF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while YMDAF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check YMDAF's competition here
FHNGY vs GRUPF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check GRUPF's competition here
FHNGY vs GPGNF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while GPGNF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check GPGNF's competition here
FHNGY vs WHTPF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while WHTPF trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 235.67. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check WHTPF's competition here
FHNGY vs PAHGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while PAHGF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check PAHGF's competition here
FHNGY vs DSITF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while DSITF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check DSITF's competition here
FHNGY vs BTOOY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check BTOOY's competition here
FHNGY vs MIZUF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MIZUF trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MIZUF's competition here
FHNGY vs LEFUF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while LEFUF trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check LEFUF's competition here
FHNGY vs MGLUY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MGLUY trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MGLUY's competition here
FHNGY vs MKRMF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MKRMF's competition here
FHNGY vs SCCAF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SCCAF's competition here
FHNGY vs FNXTF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while FNXTF trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check FNXTF's competition here
FHNGY vs ACEHF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 645.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ACEHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ACEHF's competition here
FHNGY vs THGPF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while THGPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check THGPF's competition here
FHNGY vs HWGC Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HWGC's competition here
FHNGY vs THGHY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check THGHY's competition here
FHNGY vs ASOMY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ASOMY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ASOMY's competition here
FHNGY vs ASOMF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 584.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ASOMF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ASOMF's competition here
FHNGY vs HLFDY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HLFDY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HLFDY's competition here
FHNGY vs CRFCF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 402.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while CRFCF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check CRFCF's competition here
FHNGY vs KGGNF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while KGGNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check KGGNF's competition here
FHNGY vs SSILF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SSILF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SSILF's competition here
FHNGY vs HLFDF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HLFDF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HLFDF's competition here
FHNGY vs KTYCF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 360.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while KTYCF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 112.50. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check KTYCF's competition here
FHNGY vs GMELF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while GMELF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check GMELF's competition here
FHNGY vs BHHOF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check BHHOF's competition here
FHNGY vs BHOOY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BHOOY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check BHOOY's competition here
FHNGY vs NBRNF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check NBRNF's competition here
FHNGY vs SAXJY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SAXJY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SAXJY's competition here
FHNGY vs HMAGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HMAGF's competition here
FHNGY vs HKTVY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while HKTVY trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -23.90. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check HKTVY's competition here
FHNGY vs BNNNF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BNNNF trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY and BNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.07).Check BNNNF's competition here
FHNGY vs YUMSF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while YUMSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check YUMSF's competition here
FHNGY vs RDBBY Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check RDBBY's competition here
FHNGY vs WCRS Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while WCRS trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check WCRS's competition here
FHNGY vs AHAHF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check AHAHF's competition here
FHNGY vs IGDFF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while IGDFF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check IGDFF's competition here
FHNGY vs MHCRF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check MHCRF's competition here
FHNGY vs SPGZ Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FHNGY has daily volatility of 0.07 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPGZ's competition here
FHNGY vs ADBGF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ADBGF's competition here
FHNGY vs IDGBF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check IDGBF's competition here
FHNGY vs PXHI Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while PXHI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check PXHI's competition here
FHNGY vs BJURF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BJURF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check BJURF's competition here
FHNGY vs TWRKF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check TWRKF's competition here
FHNGY vs GLHD Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check GLHD's competition here
FHNGY vs ARTZF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while ARTZF trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -44.53. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check ARTZF's competition here
FHNGY vs CNVAF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check CNVAF's competition here
FHNGY vs RDBBF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while RDBBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check RDBBF's competition here
FHNGY vs FDIT Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check FDIT's competition here
FHNGY vs SNHO Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNHO has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while SNHO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SNHO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to SNHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check SNHO's competition here
FHNGY vs BWTL Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while BWTL trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check BWTL's competition here
FHNGY vs AVDWF Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AVDWF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while AVDWF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas AVDWF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVDWF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is less volatile compared to AVDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check AVDWF's competition here
FHNGY vs RLAB Comparison July 2025
FHNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHNGY stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHNGY is priced at $6.68, while RLAB trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHNGY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FHNGY is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHNGY.Check RLAB's competition here