Flughafen Wien AG
Flughafen Wien AG (FGWLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGWLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGWLF | $56.24 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 25.92 | $2.17 | +3.35% |
| ANYYY | $13.46 | -1.32% | 201.8B | 12.46 | $1.08 | +8.25% |
| ANNSF | $28.60 | -0.63% | 42.9B | 18.82 | $1.52 | +42.97% |
| AFLYY | $1.27 | +0.00% | 33.6B | 6.10 | $0.21 | N/A |
| RYAOF | $30.26 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 13.51 | $2.24 | +1.40% |
| APTPF | $1.25 | +15.74% | 24.9B | 31.25 | $0.04 | +1.84% |
| ICAGY | $9.97 | +1.73% | 23.4B | 7.32 | $1.37 | +2.05% |
| BABWF | $5.00 | -1.38% | 23.2B | 7.25 | $0.69 | +2.03% |
| AIPUF | $1.31 | +0.00% | 18.7B | 32.80 | $0.04 | +0.05% |
| AIPUY | $11.76 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 28.00 | $0.42 | +1.94% |
Stock Comparison
FGWLF vs ANYYY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANYYY trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ANYYY's competition here
FGWLF vs ANNSF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANNSF trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ANNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANNSF's competition here
FGWLF vs AFLYY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AFLYY trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AFLYY's competition here
FGWLF vs RYAOF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while RYAOF trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and RYAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYAOF's competition here
FGWLF vs APTPF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while APTPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and APTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APTPF's competition here
FGWLF vs ICAGY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ICAGY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ICAGY trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ICAGY's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICAGY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ICAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ICAGY's competition here
FGWLF vs BABWF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BABWF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and BABWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BABWF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIPUF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIPUF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AIPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AIPUF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIPUY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIPUY trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AIPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AIPUY's competition here
FGWLF vs SINGF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SINGF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and SINGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SINGF's competition here
FGWLF vs SINGY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SINGY trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check SINGY's competition here
FGWLF vs AIRYY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIRYY trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is -223.33. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AIRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIRYY's competition here
FGWLF vs AICAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AICAF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is -62.51. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AICAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AICAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AICAF's competition here
FGWLF vs CHKIF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHKIF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CHKIF's competition here
FGWLF vs ARRPY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ARRPY trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ARRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARRPY's competition here
FGWLF vs GPAEF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GPAEF trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GPAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPAEF's competition here
FGWLF vs AEOXF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AEOXF trades at $115.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AEOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AEOXF's competition here
FGWLF vs DLAKF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while DLAKF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to DLAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check DLAKF's competition here
FGWLF vs QABSY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while QABSY trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check QABSY's competition here
FGWLF vs QUBSF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QUBSF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while QUBSF trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas QUBSF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QUBSF's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and QUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QUBSF's competition here
FGWLF vs DLAKY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while DLAKY trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check DLAKY's competition here
FGWLF vs CHEAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHEAF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CHEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHEAF's competition here
FGWLF vs TKHVY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while TKHVY trades at $70.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and TKHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKHVY's competition here
FGWLF vs CPCAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CPCAF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CPCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPCAF's competition here
FGWLF vs CPCAY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CPCAY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CPCAY's competition here
FGWLF vs ALNPF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ALNPF trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ALNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALNPF's competition here
FGWLF vs ALNPY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ALNPY trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ALNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ALNPY's competition here
FGWLF vs UZAPF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while UZAPF trades at $289.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to UZAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check UZAPF's competition here
FGWLF vs FLGZY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FLGZY trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to FLGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check FLGZY's competition here
FGWLF vs JPNRF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JPNRF trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JPNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JPNRF's competition here
FGWLF vs JAPSY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JAPSY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JAPSY's competition here
FGWLF vs ASRMF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ASRMF trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ASRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASRMF's competition here
FGWLF vs ACKDF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ACKDF trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 157.75. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ACKDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACKDF's competition here
FGWLF vs AUKNY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AUKNY trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 178.85. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AUKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AUKNY's competition here
FGWLF vs FPRUF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FPRUF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to FPRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check FPRUF's competition here
FGWLF vs FPRUY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FPRUY trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to FPRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check FPRUY's competition here
FGWLF vs EJTTF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while EJTTF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and EJTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EJTTF's competition here
FGWLF vs ESYJY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ESYJY trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ESYJY's competition here
FGWLF vs GAERF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GAERF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to GAERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check GAERF's competition here
FGWLF vs ACDVF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ACDVF trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ACDVF's competition here
FGWLF vs SPASF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SPASF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to SPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check SPASF's competition here
FGWLF vs AFRAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AFRAF trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AFRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AFRAF's competition here
FGWLF vs JAIRF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JAIRF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JAIRF's competition here
FGWLF vs SEGSF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SEGSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and SEGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEGSF's competition here
FGWLF vs JTTRY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JTTRY trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JTTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JTTRY's competition here
FGWLF vs EIFZF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while EIFZF trades at $48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to EIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check EIFZF's competition here
FGWLF vs ELALF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ELALF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ELALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ELALF's competition here
FGWLF vs TAVHY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while TAVHY trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 36.54. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to TAVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check TAVHY's competition here
FGWLF vs BJCHY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BJCHY trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to BJCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check BJCHY's competition here
FGWLF vs NWARF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NWARF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to NWARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check NWARF's competition here
FGWLF vs BJCHF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BJCHF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to BJCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check BJCHF's competition here
FGWLF vs WZZZY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while WZZZY trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to WZZZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check WZZZY's competition here
FGWLF vs WZZAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while WZZAF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to WZZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check WZZAF's competition here
FGWLF vs AGZNF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AGZNF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AGZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AGZNF's competition here
FGWLF vs GRPAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GRPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRPAF's competition here
FGWLF vs ANZLY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANZLY trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ANZLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ANZLY's competition here
FGWLF vs ANZFF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANZFF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ANZFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZFF's competition here
FGWLF vs CEBUF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 895.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CEBUF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CEBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CEBUF's competition here
FGWLF vs FNNNF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FNNNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and FNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNNNF's competition here
FGWLF vs HMCTF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while HMCTF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to HMCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check HMCTF's competition here
FGWLF vs CTTPY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CTTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CTTPY's competition here
FGWLF vs TAWNF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 438.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while TAWNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to TAWNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check TAWNF's competition here
FGWLF vs CHRRF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 422.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHRRF trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CHRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CHRRF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIABF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIABF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIABF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AIABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AIABF's competition here
FGWLF vs NOKFF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and NOKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOKFF's competition here
FGWLF vs NRSAF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NRSAF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and NRSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRSAF's competition here
FGWLF vs GOLLQ Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check GOLLQ's competition here
FGWLF vs CEBUY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CEBUY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CEBUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEBUY's competition here
FGWLF vs JETMF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JETMF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JETMF's competition here
FGWLF vs VIAAY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while VIAAY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to VIAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check VIAAY's competition here
FGWLF vs SASBQ Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check SASBQ's competition here
FGWLF vs HRBR Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while HRBR trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and HRBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRBR's competition here
FGWLF vs CAJTF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CAJTF's competition here
FGWLF vs LTMAY Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check LTMAY's competition here
FGWLF vs SKAS Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SKAS trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to SKAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check SKAS's competition here
FGWLF vs ACAVF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ACAVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACAVF's competition here
FGWLF vs NOKPF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NOKPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to NOKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check NOKPF's competition here
FGWLF vs JETR Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 594.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JETR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and JETR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JETR's competition here
FGWLF vs KLMR Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 18.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to KLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check KLMR's competition here
FGWLF vs PACC Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and PACC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PACC's competition here
FGWLF vs BPOL Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and BPOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPOL's competition here
FGWLF vs GLUX Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 898. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GLUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLUX's competition here
FGWLF vs RHWI Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and RHWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RHWI's competition here
FGWLF vs CHHCF Comparison August 2025
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CHHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHHCF's competition here