Flughafen Wien AG
Flughafen Wien AG (FGWLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGWLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGWLF | $56.24 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 25.92 | $2.17 | +3.44% |
| ANNSF | $32.48 | +0.01% | 48.1B | 12.66 | $2.53 | +3.51% |
| ANYYY | $15.98 | -1.18% | 47.6B | 12.49 | $1.27 | +3.50% |
| RYAOF | $38.00 | +0.00% | 39.9B | 15.08 | $2.52 | +1.29% |
| AFLYY | $1.46 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 3.89 | $0.38 | N/A |
| ICAGY | $11.73 | -0.09% | 28B | 7.89 | $1.53 | +1.70% |
| BABWF | $6.00 | +0.00% | 27.4B | 7.89 | $0.76 | +1.92% |
| AIPUY | $17.93 | +0.00% | 25.6B | 44.83 | $0.40 | +0.99% |
| CHEAF | $0.80 | +0.00% | 23.6B | -80.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AIPUF | $1.58 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 39.50 | $0.04 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
FGWLF vs ANNSF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANNSF trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ANNSF's competition here
FGWLF vs ANYYY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANYYY trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ANYYY's competition here
FGWLF vs RYAOF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while RYAOF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and RYAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYAOF's competition here
FGWLF vs AFLYY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AFLYY trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check AFLYY's competition here
FGWLF vs ICAGY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ICAGY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ICAGY trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ICAGY's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICAGY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ICAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ICAGY's competition here
FGWLF vs BABWF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BABWF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and BABWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BABWF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIPUY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIPUY trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AIPUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIPUY's competition here
FGWLF vs CHEAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHEAF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CHEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHEAF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIPUF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIPUF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AIPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIPUF's competition here
FGWLF vs AICAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AICAF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AICAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AICAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AICAF's competition here
FGWLF vs CHKIF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHKIF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CHKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHKIF's competition here
FGWLF vs SINGY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SINGY trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check SINGY's competition here
FGWLF vs SINGF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SINGF trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and SINGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SINGF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIRYY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIRYY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is 633.33. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AIRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIRYY's competition here
FGWLF vs APTPF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while APTPF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and APTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APTPF's competition here
FGWLF vs AEOXF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AEOXF trades at $143.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 132.80. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AEOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEOXF's competition here
FGWLF vs ARRPY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ARRPY trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 127.75. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ARRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARRPY's competition here
FGWLF vs GPAEF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GPAEF trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GPAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPAEF's competition here
FGWLF vs DLAKY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while DLAKY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check DLAKY's competition here
FGWLF vs DLAKF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while DLAKF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to DLAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check DLAKF's competition here
FGWLF vs QABSY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while QABSY trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check QABSY's competition here
FGWLF vs CPCAY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CPCAY trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CPCAY's competition here
FGWLF vs QUBSF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QUBSF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while QUBSF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas QUBSF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QUBSF's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and QUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QUBSF's competition here
FGWLF vs TKHVY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while TKHVY trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and TKHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKHVY's competition here
FGWLF vs ASRMF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ASRMF trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ASRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ASRMF's competition here
FGWLF vs CPCAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CPCAF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CPCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CPCAF's competition here
FGWLF vs UZAPF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while UZAPF trades at $339.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and UZAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UZAPF's competition here
FGWLF vs FLGZY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FLGZY trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and FLGZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLGZY's competition here
FGWLF vs ALNPY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ALNPY trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ALNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ALNPY's competition here
FGWLF vs ALNPF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ALNPF trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ALNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALNPF's competition here
FGWLF vs AUKNY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AUKNY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AUKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUKNY's competition here
FGWLF vs JAPSY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JAPSY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JAPSY's competition here
FGWLF vs ACKDF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ACKDF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ACKDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACKDF's competition here
FGWLF vs JPNRF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JPNRF trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and JPNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPNRF's competition here
FGWLF vs FPRUF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FPRUF trades at $84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and FPRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPRUF's competition here
FGWLF vs FPRUY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FPRUY trades at $40.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and FPRUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPRUY's competition here
FGWLF vs TAWNF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while TAWNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to TAWNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check TAWNF's competition here
FGWLF vs GAERF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GAERF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GAERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAERF's competition here
FGWLF vs WZZZY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while WZZZY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and WZZZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WZZZY's competition here
FGWLF vs SPASF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SPASF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and SPASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPASF's competition here
FGWLF vs EJTTF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while EJTTF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and EJTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EJTTF's competition here
FGWLF vs ESYJY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ESYJY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ESYJY's competition here
FGWLF vs EIFZF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while EIFZF trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and EIFZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIFZF's competition here
FGWLF vs ACDVF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ACDVF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check ACDVF's competition here
FGWLF vs AFRAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AFRAF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AFRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFRAF's competition here
FGWLF vs ELALF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ELALF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ELALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELALF's competition here
FGWLF vs JTTRY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JTTRY trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and JTTRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JTTRY's competition here
FGWLF vs SEGSF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SEGSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and SEGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEGSF's competition here
FGWLF vs JAIRF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JAIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and JAIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAIRF's competition here
FGWLF vs TAVHY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while TAVHY trades at $29.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and TAVHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAVHY's competition here
FGWLF vs NWARF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NWARF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and NWARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWARF's competition here
FGWLF vs WZZAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while WZZAF trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to WZZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check WZZAF's competition here
FGWLF vs BJCHF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BJCHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and BJCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJCHF's competition here
FGWLF vs AGZNF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AGZNF trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AGZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGZNF's competition here
FGWLF vs ANZFF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANZFF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ANZFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZFF's competition here
FGWLF vs GRPAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GRPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRPAF's competition here
FGWLF vs BJCHY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BJCHY trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and BJCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJCHY's competition here
FGWLF vs ANZLY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ANZLY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ANZLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZLY's competition here
FGWLF vs CEBUF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CEBUF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CEBUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEBUF's competition here
FGWLF vs FNNNF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 727M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while FNNNF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and FNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNNNF's competition here
FGWLF vs AIABF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while AIABF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIABF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and AIABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIABF's competition here
FGWLF vs HMCTF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while HMCTF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and HMCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMCTF's competition here
FGWLF vs CTTPY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CTTPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTTPY's competition here
FGWLF vs CHRRF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHRRF trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CHRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHRRF's competition here
FGWLF vs NOKFF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and NOKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOKFF's competition here
FGWLF vs VIAAY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while VIAAY trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and VIAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIAAY's competition here
FGWLF vs NRSAF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NRSAF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and NRSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRSAF's competition here
FGWLF vs HRBR Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while HRBR trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and HRBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRBR's competition here
FGWLF vs GOLLQ Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check GOLLQ's competition here
FGWLF vs CEBUY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CEBUY trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CEBUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEBUY's competition here
FGWLF vs NOKPF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while NOKPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and NOKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOKPF's competition here
FGWLF vs JETMF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JETMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check JETMF's competition here
FGWLF vs SASBQ Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check SASBQ's competition here
FGWLF vs CAJTF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check CAJTF's competition here
FGWLF vs LTMAY Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGWLF.Check LTMAY's competition here
FGWLF vs SKAS Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while SKAS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKAS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and SKAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKAS's competition here
FGWLF vs ACAVF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and ACAVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACAVF's competition here
FGWLF vs JETR Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 402.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while JETR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and JETR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JETR's competition here
FGWLF vs KLMR Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and KLMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLMR's competition here
FGWLF vs PACC Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and PACC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PACC's competition here
FGWLF vs BPOL Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and BPOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPOL's competition here
FGWLF vs GLUX Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and GLUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLUX's competition here
FGWLF vs RHWI Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and RHWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RHWI's competition here
FGWLF vs CHHCF Comparison February 2026
FGWLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGWLF stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGWLF is priced at $56.24, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGWLF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.92, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGWLF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGWLF and CHHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHHCF's competition here