Finsbury Growth & Income Trust PLC
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust PLC FGT.L Peers
See (FGT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGT.L | £908.00 | +0.11% | 1.3B | 15.66 | £0.58 | +2.16% |
| UINC.L | £2,370.25 | +0.71% | 32.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.25% |
| DEMS.L | £2,125.50 | -0.63% | 11B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DEM.L | £1,162.38 | -0.57% | 11B | N/A | N/A | +5.89% |
| EEI.L | £1,137.50 | -0.04% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +4.63% |
| EEIP.L | £1,809.60 | -0.06% | 4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JGGI.L | £524.00 | -1.32% | 2.7B | 5.35 | £0.98 | +4.35% |
| GINC.L | £3,808.00 | +0.28% | 2.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.61% |
| FUSA.L | £12.84 | -0.47% | 2B | 23.07 | £0.56 | N/A |
| FUSD.L | £10.75 | -0.12% | 1.5B | 23.03 | £0.47 | +0.83% |
Stock Comparison
FGT.L vs UINC.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UINC.L has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while UINC.L trades at £2,370.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas UINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to UINC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DEMS.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DEMS.L has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DEMS.L trades at £2,125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DEMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to DEMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DEM.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DEM.L has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DEM.L trades at £1,162.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to DEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs EEI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EEI.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while EEI.L trades at £1,137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EEI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to EEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs EEIP.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EEIP.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while EEIP.L trades at £1,809.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EEIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to EEIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JGGI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JGGI.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JGGI.L trades at £524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JGGI.L's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGGI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JGGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs GINC.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GINC.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while GINC.L trades at £3,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to GINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FUSA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUSA.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FUSA.L trades at £12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FUSA.L's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FUSD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUSD.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FUSD.L trades at £10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FUSD.L's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FUSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FUSP.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUSP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FUSP.L trades at £10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FUSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FUSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SEQI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SEQI.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SEQI.L trades at £79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SEQI.L's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEQI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to SEQI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FUSI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FUSI.L trades at £797.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FUSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L and FUSI.L have similar daily volatility (1.08).
FGT.L vs FUQA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUQA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FUQA.L trades at £955.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FUQA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUQA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FUQA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs WUKD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WUKD.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while WUKD.L trades at £464.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas WUKD.L's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to WUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JSET.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JSET.L has a market cap of 945.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JSET.L trades at £90.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JSET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JSET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to JSET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MUT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MUT.L has a market cap of 836.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MUT.L trades at £853.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MUT.L's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MUT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to MUT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FGQP.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FGQP.L has a market cap of 829.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FGQP.L trades at £8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FGQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FGQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs TFIF.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TFIF.L has a market cap of 827.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while TFIF.L trades at £110.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TFIF.L's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFIF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to TFIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JPSA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JPSA.L has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JPSA.L trades at £119.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JPSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to JPSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JPST.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JPST.L has a market cap of 644.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JPST.L trades at £101.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JPST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to JPST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SOI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SOI.L has a market cap of 630.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SOI.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SOI.L's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to SOI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FGQD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FGQD.L has a market cap of 615.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FGQD.L trades at £676.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs BSIF.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BSIF.L has a market cap of 547.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while BSIF.L trades at £92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BSIF.L's P/E ratio is -46.20. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSIF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to BSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JEGI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JEGI.L has a market cap of 506.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JEGI.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JEGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JEGI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JEGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JPAS.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JPAS.L has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JPAS.L trades at £88.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JPAS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPAS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to JPAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SEIT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SEIT.L has a market cap of 477.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SEIT.L trades at £44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SEIT.L's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to SEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JETI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JETI.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JETI.L trades at £175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JETI.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JETI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JETI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs UIND.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UIND.L has a market cap of 406.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while UIND.L trades at £31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas UIND.L's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UIND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to UIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DIG.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DIG.L has a market cap of 387.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DIG.L trades at £299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DIG.L's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIG.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to DIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs NAIT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NAIT.L has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while NAIT.L trades at £318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas NAIT.L's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAIT.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to NAIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JEMI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JEMI.L has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JEMI.L trades at £141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JEMI.L's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JEMI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JEMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs HFEL.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HFEL.L has a market cap of 372.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while HFEL.L trades at £214.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas HFEL.L's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HFEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to HFEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs BIPS.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BIPS.L has a market cap of 358.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while BIPS.L trades at £171.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BIPS.L's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIPS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to BIPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs HINT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HINT.L has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while HINT.L trades at £175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas HINT.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HINT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to HINT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CTUK.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTUK.L has a market cap of 337.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CTUK.L trades at £333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CTUK.L's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTUK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to CTUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CMHY.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMHY.L has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CMHY.L trades at £176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CMHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to CMHY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs AAIF.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAIF.L has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while AAIF.L trades at £211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas AAIF.L's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to AAIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs HHI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HHI.L has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while HHI.L trades at £179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas HHI.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to HHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs 0P0000X63U.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0P0000X63U.L has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while 0P0000X63U.L trades at £1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas 0P0000X63U.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0P0000X63U.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000X63U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JAGI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JAGI.L has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JAGI.L trades at £366.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JAGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAGI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JAGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CCJI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCJI.L has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CCJI.L trades at £191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CCJI.L's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCJI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to CCJI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs ASLI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASLI.L has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while ASLI.L trades at £60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ASLI.L's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASLI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to ASLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SMIF.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SMIF.L has a market cap of 243.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SMIF.L trades at £86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SMIF.L's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMIF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to SMIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DIVI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DIVI.L has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DIVI.L trades at £103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DIVI.L's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIVI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to DIVI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs AERI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AERI.L has a market cap of 243.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while AERI.L trades at £0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas AERI.L's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AERI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to AERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FA17.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FA17.L has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FA17.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FA17.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FA17.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to FA17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FAIR.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FAIR.L has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FAIR.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FAIR.L's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAIR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to FAIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SCF.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCF.L has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SCF.L trades at £309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SCF.L's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCF.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to SCF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JGST.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JGST.L has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JGST.L trades at £101.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JGST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to JGST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JGSA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JGSA.L has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JGSA.L trades at £115.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JGSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JGSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to JGSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs HEIT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HEIT.L has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while HEIT.L trades at £92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas HEIT.L's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEIT.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to HEIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CCJS.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCJS.L has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CCJS.L trades at £0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CCJS.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCJS.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to CCJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs IGV.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IGV.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while IGV.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas IGV.L's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGV.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to IGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs TORO.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TORO.L has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while TORO.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TORO.L's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TORO.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to TORO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JCGI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JCGI.L has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JCGI.L trades at £224.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JCGI.L's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JCGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SGQD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SGQD.L has a market cap of 178.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SGQD.L trades at £330.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to SGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs ASIZ.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIZ.L has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while ASIZ.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ASIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASIZ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to ASIZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs IVPG.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IVPG.L has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while IVPG.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas IVPG.L's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVPG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to IVPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DHSD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DHSD.L has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DHSD.L trades at £24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DHSD.L's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHSD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to DHSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MIX.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MIX.L has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MIX.L trades at £50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MIX.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIX.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to MIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs AEI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AEI.L has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while AEI.L trades at £349.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas AEI.L's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to AEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MGCI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MGCI.L has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MGCI.L trades at £95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MGCI.L's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGCI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to MGCI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CVCG.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CVCG.L has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CVCG.L trades at £117.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CVCG.L's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVCG.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to CVCG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs TIGT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TIGT.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while TIGT.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TIGT.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to TIGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs PGOO.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PGOO.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while PGOO.L trades at £49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PGOO.L's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGOO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to PGOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs ASIT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIT.L has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while ASIT.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ASIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASIT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to ASIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DEMD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DEMD.L has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DEMD.L trades at £15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DEMD.L's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to DEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs BRSA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRSA.L has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while BRSA.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BRSA.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRSA.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to BRSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs GABI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GABI.L has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while GABI.L trades at £65.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GABI.L's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GABI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to GABI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MCT.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MCT.L has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MCT.L trades at £127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MCT.L's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCT.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to MCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs BERI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BERI.L has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while BERI.L trades at £111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BERI.L's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BERI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to BERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CYN.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CYN.L has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CYN.L trades at £201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CYN.L's P/E ratio is -28.71. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to CYN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs ADIG.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADIG.L has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while ADIG.L trades at £45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ADIG.L's P/E ratio is -45.80. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADIG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to ADIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DHSA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DHSA.L has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DHSA.L trades at £30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DHSA.L's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to DHSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DHS.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DHS.L has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DHS.L trades at £1,824.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to DHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs HDIV.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HDIV.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while HDIV.L trades at £66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas HDIV.L's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDIV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FGT.L has daily volatility of 1.08 and HDIV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
FGT.L vs FEMD.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FEMD.L has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FEMD.L trades at £4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs SHRS.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHRS.L has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while SHRS.L trades at £266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SHRS.L's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHRS.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to SHRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs CMPI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMPI.L has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while CMPI.L trades at £115.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CMPI.L's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMPI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to CMPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs DHSP.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DHSP.L has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while DHSP.L trades at £2,231.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas DHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to DHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs GRIW.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRIW.L has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while GRIW.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRIW.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to GRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MAV4.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAV4.L has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MAV4.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MAV4.L's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAV4.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to MAV4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs VIP.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIP.L has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while VIP.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas VIP.L's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to VIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FEMQ.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FEMQ.L has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FEMQ.L trades at £4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FEMQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FEMQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FEMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MIG4.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MIG4.L has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MIG4.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MIG4.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIG4.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to MIG4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MATE.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MATE.L has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MATE.L trades at £103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MATE.L's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MATE.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to MATE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs RMII.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RMII.L has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while RMII.L trades at £73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RMII.L's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMII.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to RMII.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MIG5.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MIG5.L has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MIG5.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MIG5.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIG5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to MIG5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MIG1.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MIG1.L has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MIG1.L trades at £37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MIG1.L's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIG1.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to MIG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MIG3.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MIG3.L has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MIG3.L trades at £46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MIG3.L's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIG3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to MIG3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs JEFI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JEFI.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while JEFI.L trades at £94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas JEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JEFI.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to JEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs ASCI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASCI.L has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while ASCI.L trades at £238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ASCI.L's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASCI.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to ASCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs MIG.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MIG.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while MIG.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MIG.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to MIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs RCOI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RCOI.L has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while RCOI.L trades at £0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RCOI.L's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCOI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to RCOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs EEIA.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EEIA.L has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while EEIA.L trades at £21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EEIA.L's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to EEIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FEQP.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FEQP.L has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FEQP.L trades at £8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FEQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FEQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FEQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs BRIG.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRIG.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while BRIG.L trades at £205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BRIG.L's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRIG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is less volatile compared to BRIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs FEUI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FEUI.L has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while FEUI.L trades at £5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FEUI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FEUI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to FEUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.
FGT.L vs ALAI.L Comparison
FGT.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGT.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALAI.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FGT.L is priced at £908.00, while ALAI.L trades at £62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGT.L currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ALAI.L's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FGT.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALAI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGT.L is more volatile compared to ALAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGT.L.