First Trust Specialty Finance and Financial Opportunities Fund

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VFINX trades at $546.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VOO trades at $541.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VITSX trades at $141.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTSAX trades at $141.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 601.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTI trades at $289.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 594B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FXAIX trades at $205.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 582.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while IVV trades at $592.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 541B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while SPY trades at $589.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 469.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTSNX trades at $143.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 467.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VXUS trades at $66.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 338.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VMCPX trades at $363.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 311.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VIMAX trades at $333.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VINIX trades at $481.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VIIIX trades at $481.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 280.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while GAFFX trades at $76.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 280.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RGAGX trades at $77.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 279.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AGTHX trades at $76.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 269.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while GFAFX trades at $76.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 241.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RGABX trades at $68.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 238B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RGAAX trades at $67.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 233.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while ABALX trades at $35.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 232.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RLBGX trades at $35.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 232.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AMBFX trades at $35.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 232.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AFMBX trades at $35.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while GFACX trades at $65.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while BALFX trades at $35.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 215.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VEA trades at $55.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VDIPX trades at $27.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 213.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTMNX trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 204.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while QQQ trades at $519.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VB trades at $228.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTV trades at $171.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VO trades at $270.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while BX trades at $138.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while BLK trades at $978.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 147.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FCTDX trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AIVSX trades at $59.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AICFX trades at $59.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RICAX trades at $59.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RICBX trades at $59.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AICCX trades at $58.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FCNTX trades at $21.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FCNKX trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 143.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AWSHX trades at $63.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 143.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RWMFX trades at $63.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FWMIX trades at $63.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 143B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while CWMAX trades at $63.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while WSHFX trades at $63.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while C-PN trades at $29.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while WSHCX trades at $62.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while NPFFX trades at $66.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RNPGX trades at $66.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RWMBX trades at $62.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FNPFX trades at $66.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 139.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while ANWPX trades at $66.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AFIFX trades at $84.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while ANCFX trades at $84.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while CFNAX trades at $84.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while IEFA trades at $82.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AEPGX trades at $60.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RERGX trades at $60.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AEGFX trades at $59.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AEPFX trades at $59.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RERHX trades at $59.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AGG trades at $98.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.10. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while IWF trades at $399.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while KKR trades at $121.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 51.66. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VWELX trades at $43.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VWENX trades at $75.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VSCIX trades at $109.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while NAESX trades at $109.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTTHX trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VIG trades at $198.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VDADX trades at $53.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VDADX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VUG trades at $412.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while JLGRX trades at $82.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while JLGMX trades at $83.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while SEEGX trades at $79.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while FSKAX trades at $162.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTHRX trades at $39.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while TBCIX trades at $190.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while BN trades at $57.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 198.97. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while TRBCX trades at $189.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VFORX trades at $45.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while DODGX trades at $263.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while IJH trades at $60.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while PABGX trades at $182.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VTIVX trades at $31.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while BAM trades at $56.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VITAX trades at $311.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VGT trades at $606.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RAFFX trades at $44.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while RRBGX trades at $170.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VIEIX trades at $139.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while VEMAX trades at $39.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, EFA has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while EFA trades at $88.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas EFA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is less volatile compared to EFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while PRUFX trades at $105.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AMCPX trades at $43.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.

FGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FGB stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGB is priced at $4.02, while AMPFX trades at $42.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FGB currently has a P/E ratio of 4.96, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, FGB's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGB is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGB.