Figeac Aero SA
Figeac Aero SA FGA.PA Peers
See (FGA.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGA.PA | €10.60 | -0.47% | 449.2M | -132.50 | -€0.08 | N/A |
| BOEI.BR | €224.00 | -8.20% | 135.1B | -29.87 | -€7.50 | N/A |
| AIR.PA | €161.76 | -0.75% | 127.4B | 28.83 | €5.61 | +0.54% |
| SAF.PA | €257.90 | -1.56% | 107.5B | -161.19 | -€1.60 | +1.12% |
| HO.PA | €245.90 | -0.97% | 50.5B | 50.29 | €4.89 | +1.50% |
| AM.PA | €303.60 | -0.72% | 23.7B | 25.79 | €11.77 | +1.35% |
| MLHK.PA | €107.00 | -0.93% | 3.8B | 124.42 | €0.86 | +0.06% |
| THEON.AS | €30.00 | -0.99% | 2.1B | 30.61 | €0.98 | +1.82% |
| FII.PA | €32.40 | +0.31% | 1.5B | 27.00 | €1.20 | +1.20% |
| EXA.PA | €85.90 | -0.35% | 1.5B | -409.05 | -€0.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FGA.PA vs BOEI.BR Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, BOEI.BR has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while BOEI.BR trades at €224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas BOEI.BR's P/E ratio is -29.87. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BOEI.BR's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to BOEI.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs AIR.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, AIR.PA has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while AIR.PA trades at €161.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas AIR.PA's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AIR.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to AIR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs SAF.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, SAF.PA has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while SAF.PA trades at €257.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas SAF.PA's P/E ratio is -161.19. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to SAF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs HO.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, HO.PA has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while HO.PA trades at €245.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas HO.PA's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HO.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to HO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs AM.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, AM.PA has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while AM.PA trades at €303.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas AM.PA's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to AM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs MLHK.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, MLHK.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while MLHK.PA trades at €107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas MLHK.PA's P/E ratio is 124.42. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MLHK.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to MLHK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs THEON.AS Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, THEON.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while THEON.AS trades at €30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas THEON.AS's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to THEON.AS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to THEON.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs FII.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, FII.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while FII.PA trades at €32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas FII.PA's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FII.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to FII.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs EXA.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, EXA.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while EXA.PA trades at €85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas EXA.PA's P/E ratio is -409.05. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EXA.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to EXA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs SX.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, SX.PA has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while SX.PA trades at €11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas SX.PA's P/E ratio is 230.00. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SX.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to SX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs LAT.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, LAT.PA has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while LAT.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas LAT.PA's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LAT.PA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is less volatile compared to LAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs SOG.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, SOG.PA has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while SOG.PA trades at €19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas SOG.PA's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SOG.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to SOG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs MLVER.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, MLVER.PA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while MLVER.PA trades at €3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas MLVER.PA's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MLVER.PA's ROE of -12.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to MLVER.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs ALDR.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, ALDR.PA has a market cap of 879.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while ALDR.PA trades at €1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas ALDR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALDR.PA's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is less volatile compared to ALDR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs GOE.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, GOE.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while GOE.PA trades at €19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas GOE.PA's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOE.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to GOE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs MLTEA.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, MLTEA.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while MLTEA.PA trades at €324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas MLTEA.PA's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MLTEA.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to MLTEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.
FGA.PA vs MLAIM.PA Comparison
FGA.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGA.PA stands at 449.2M. In comparison, MLAIM.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGA.PA is priced at €10.60, while MLAIM.PA trades at €1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -132.50, whereas MLAIM.PA's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, FGA.PA's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MLAIM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGA.PA is more volatile compared to MLAIM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGA.PA.