Future First Technologies Ltd
Future First Technologies Ltd FFT.AX Peers
See (FFT.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFT.AX | A$0.01 | -11.11% | 6.4M | -0.40 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| LNK.AX | A$2.25 | +7.66% | 1.2B | 3.21 | A$0.70 | N/A |
| DTL.AX | A$7.41 | -1.07% | 1.1B | 26.46 | A$0.28 | +3.51% |
| EML.AX | A$1.15 | -2.97% | 437.5M | 38.17 | A$0.03 | N/A |
| ATA.AX | A$0.84 | +0.60% | 318.5M | 20.88 | A$0.04 | N/A |
| APX.AX | A$1.15 | -1.29% | 303.3M | -8.81 | -A$0.13 | N/A |
| DUG.AX | A$1.37 | +10.53% | 183.8M | -45.50 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| COS.AX | A$0.59 | -9.92% | 107.4M | 11.80 | A$0.05 | +4.05% |
| CCR.AX | A$0.21 | -4.55% | 89.2M | -21.00 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| WCG.AX | A$0.25 | -2.00% | 82M | -4.08 | -A$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FFT.AX vs LNK.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, LNK.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while LNK.AX trades at A$2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LNK.AX's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LNK.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to LNK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs DTL.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, DTL.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while DTL.AX trades at A$7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DTL.AX's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to DTL.AX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to DTL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs EML.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, EML.AX has a market cap of 437.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while EML.AX trades at A$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas EML.AX's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to EML.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to EML.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs ATA.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, ATA.AX has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while ATA.AX trades at A$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ATA.AX's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ATA.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to ATA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs APX.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, APX.AX has a market cap of 303.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while APX.AX trades at A$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas APX.AX's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to APX.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to APX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs DUG.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, DUG.AX has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while DUG.AX trades at A$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DUG.AX's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to DUG.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to DUG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs COS.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, COS.AX has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while COS.AX trades at A$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas COS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to COS.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to COS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs CCR.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CCR.AX has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CCR.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CCR.AX's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CCR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to CCR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs WCG.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, WCG.AX has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while WCG.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas WCG.AX's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WCG.AX's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to WCG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs KYP.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, KYP.AX has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while KYP.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas KYP.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KYP.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and KYP.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFT.AX vs CCA.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CCA.AX has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CCA.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CCA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CCA.AX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to CCA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs CNW.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CNW.AX has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CNW.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CNW.AX's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CNW.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to CNW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs CCG.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CCG.AX has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CCG.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CCG.AX's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CCG.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to CCG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs DOU.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, DOU.AX has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while DOU.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DOU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to DOU.AX's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and DOU.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFT.AX vs DXN.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, DXN.AX has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while DXN.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DXN.AX's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to DXN.AX's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to DXN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs REM.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, REM.AX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while REM.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas REM.AX's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to REM.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to REM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs SOC.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, SOC.AX has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while SOC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SOC.AX's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SOC.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and SOC.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFT.AX vs LBY.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, LBY.AX has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while LBY.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LBY.AX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LBY.AX's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to LBY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs ATV.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, ATV.AX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while ATV.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ATV.AX's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ATV.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to ATV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs OVT.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, OVT.AX has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while OVT.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OVT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to OVT.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and OVT.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFT.AX vs CT1.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CT1.AX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CT1.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CT1.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CT1.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX is less volatile compared to CT1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFT.AX.
FFT.AX vs CGO.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CGO.AX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CGO.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CGO.AX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CGO.AX's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and CGO.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFT.AX vs DC2.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, DC2.AX has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while DC2.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DC2.AX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to DC2.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and DC2.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFT.AX vs IVO.AX Comparison
FFT.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFT.AX stands at 6.4M. In comparison, IVO.AX has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFT.AX is priced at A$0.01, while IVO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFT.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IVO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FFT.AX's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IVO.AX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FFT.AX and IVO.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).