Future Farm Technologies Inc.
Future Farm Technologies Inc. FFRMF Peers
See (FFRMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFRMF | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 171 | N/A | -$0.05 | N/A |
| WLMIY | $23.91 | +1.31% | 14.9B | 12.79 | $1.87 | +5.16% |
| WLMIF | $2.08 | -12.97% | 13B | 10.95 | $0.19 | +5.91% |
| MHGVY | $18.61 | -1.00% | 9.6B | 25.49 | $0.73 | +3.34% |
| MNHVF | $18.44 | +3.77% | 9.5B | 25.26 | $0.73 | +3.59% |
| HLKKF | $0.02 | +14900.00% | 7.3B | -0.21 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SALRF | $54.04 | +17.48% | 7.2B | 40.63 | $1.33 | +6.04% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | N/A | 6.9B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +1.11% |
| PPOKF | $0.39 | +15.59% | 6.4B | 39.30 | $0.01 | +0.47% |
| KLKBY | $5.32 | +24.15% | 6.3B | 35.47 | $0.15 | +0.59% |
Stock Comparison
FFRMF vs WLMIY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while WLMIY trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs WLMIF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while WLMIF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and WLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs MHGVY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MHGVY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs MNHVF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MNHVF trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and MNHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs HLKKF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while HLKKF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and HLKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SALRF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SALRF trades at $54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs KLKBF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and KLKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs PPOKF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and PPOKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs KLKBY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and KLKBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs CHPFF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and CHPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SALRY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SALRY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs CPOUF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CPOUF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and CPOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs AAYYY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is -931.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs ACOPY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while ACOPY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and ACOPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs BKFKF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while BKFKF trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 72.83. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and BKFKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs GARPF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GARPF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and GARPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs IDBHF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs KNKZF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and KNKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs ASTVF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and ASTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SLCJY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SLCJY trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs PTABF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PTABF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs DNDPF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and DNDPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs UPBMF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while UPBMF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs CTTQF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and CTTQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs GRCLF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 878.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GRCLF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and GRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs MRVSY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 862.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MRVSY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -16.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and MRVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs EDESY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while EDESY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and EDESY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs PPLFF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs ASAGF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 602.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while ASAGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and ASAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SISAF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 562.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and SISAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs MHPSY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 469.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MHPSY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and MHPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs GRGSF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 460.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GRGSF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and GRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs AAGRY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 458.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while AAGRY trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and AAGRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs ALFDF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 449.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while ALFDF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs ORENF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while ORENF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and ORENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs BRCPF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and BRCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SLMCF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and SLMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SLCJF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs PPLFY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PPLFY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs AEPLF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while AEPLF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and AEPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs UVPOF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while UVPOF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs PRCF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs SARDY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SARDY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and SARDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SARDF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SARDF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs STNT Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while STNT trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and STNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs DDEJF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while DDEJF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs DNDEF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs CTUNF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CTUNF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs NNUTU Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and NNUTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs AASZF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while AASZF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and AASZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs GARPY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GARPY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and GARPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs CLAD Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs OPTHF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while OPTHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs GLGLF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GLGLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and GLGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs CMGHY Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs SPZI Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SPZI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs PEASF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PEASF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and PEASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs IGPFF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while IGPFF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs HERB Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while HERB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs GSFD Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GSFD trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and GSFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs GCEH Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs CMGHF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CMGHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and CMGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs RSSFF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and RSSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs MINE Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs STEV Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and STEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs PNDHF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 915.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and PNDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs FLAF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 460.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to FLAF's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and FLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs MSRM Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 356.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MSRM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs CFPI Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 285.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CFPI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs MSAH Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while MSAH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and MSAH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs HERF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 201.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while HERF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and HERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SHMP Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and SHMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs CHYI Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CHYI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and CHYI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs OGAA Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and OGAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs URBF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to URBF's ROE of -56.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs SUWN Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and SUWN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs SIAF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and SIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs URYL Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and URYL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs BIQIF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFRMF.
FFRMF vs TAER Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while TAER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and TAER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs KALRQ Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and KALRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs OCESP Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and OCESP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs CAOX Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, CAOX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while CAOX trades at $601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and CAOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs BYIN Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, BYIN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while BYIN trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and BYIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFRMF vs TSLLF Comparison
FFRMF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFRMF stands at 171. In comparison, TSLLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFRMF is priced at $0.00, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFRMF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, FFRMF's ROE is -2.83%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFRMF and TSLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).