Foundry Fuel Products Limited
Foundry Fuel Products Limited (FFPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FFPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFPL.BO | ₹6.60 | +2.64% | 52.9M | -20.62 | -₹0.32 | N/A |
| COALINDIA.NS | ₹462.25 | -1.02% | 2.8T | 9.50 | ₹48.43 | +5.74% |
| COALINDIA.BO | ₹462.10 | -1.01% | 2.8T | 9.49 | ₹48.45 | +5.74% |
| ADANIENT.NS | ₹1,975.40 | +0.73% | 2.3T | 17.88 | ₹110.61 | +0.07% |
| ADANIENT.BO | ₹1,975.30 | +0.77% | 2.3T | 17.87 | ₹110.56 | +0.07% |
| GMDCLTD.NS | ₹553.10 | +4.61% | 169.2B | 17.11 | ₹31.09 | +1.90% |
| GMDCLTD.BO | ₹552.85 | +4.57% | 169.1B | 17.11 | ₹31.09 | +1.90% |
| REFEX.BO | ₹196.65 | -0.68% | 26.6B | 14.99 | ₹12.93 | +0.26% |
| REFEX.NS | ₹196.49 | -0.78% | 26.6B | 14.99 | ₹12.91 | +0.26% |
| STRATMONT.BO | ₹69.98 | -1.42% | 1.9B | 70.97 | ₹0.96 | +0.15% |
Stock Comparison
FFPL.BO vs COALINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, COALINDIA.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while COALINDIA.NS trades at ₹462.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas COALINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COALINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is more volatile compared to COALINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check COALINDIA.NS's competition here
FFPL.BO vs COALINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, COALINDIA.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while COALINDIA.BO trades at ₹462.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas COALINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COALINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is more volatile compared to COALINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check COALINDIA.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs ADANIENT.NS Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, ADANIENT.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while ADANIENT.NS trades at ₹1,975.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas ADANIENT.NS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ADANIENT.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check ADANIENT.NS's competition here
FFPL.BO vs ADANIENT.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, ADANIENT.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while ADANIENT.BO trades at ₹1,975.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas ADANIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ADANIENT.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check ADANIENT.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs GMDCLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, GMDCLTD.NS has a market cap of 169.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while GMDCLTD.NS trades at ₹553.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas GMDCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GMDCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to GMDCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check GMDCLTD.NS's competition here
FFPL.BO vs GMDCLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, GMDCLTD.BO has a market cap of 169.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while GMDCLTD.BO trades at ₹552.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas GMDCLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GMDCLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to GMDCLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check GMDCLTD.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs REFEX.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, REFEX.BO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while REFEX.BO trades at ₹196.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas REFEX.BO's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to REFEX.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to REFEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check REFEX.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs REFEX.NS Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, REFEX.NS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while REFEX.NS trades at ₹196.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas REFEX.NS's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to REFEX.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to REFEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check REFEX.NS's competition here
FFPL.BO vs STRATMONT.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, STRATMONT.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while STRATMONT.BO trades at ₹69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas STRATMONT.BO's P/E ratio is 70.97. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STRATMONT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to STRATMONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check STRATMONT.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs ANMOL.NS Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, ANMOL.NS has a market cap of 603.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while ANMOL.NS trades at ₹10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas ANMOL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ANMOL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to ANMOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check ANMOL.NS's competition here
FFPL.BO vs ANMOL.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, ANMOL.BO has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while ANMOL.BO trades at ₹10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas ANMOL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ANMOL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is more volatile compared to ANMOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check ANMOL.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs CHANDRAP.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, CHANDRAP.BO has a market cap of 326.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while CHANDRAP.BO trades at ₹12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas CHANDRAP.BO's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHANDRAP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to CHANDRAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check CHANDRAP.BO's competition here
FFPL.BO vs MERCATOR.NS Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, MERCATOR.NS has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while MERCATOR.NS trades at ₹0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas MERCATOR.NS's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MERCATOR.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is less volatile compared to MERCATOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check MERCATOR.NS's competition here
FFPL.BO vs ZINEMA.BO Comparison March 2026
FFPL.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFPL.BO stands at 52.9M. In comparison, ZINEMA.BO has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, FFPL.BO is priced at ₹6.60, while ZINEMA.BO trades at ₹18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.62, whereas ZINEMA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, FFPL.BO's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ZINEMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFPL.BO is more volatile compared to ZINEMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFPL.BO.Check ZINEMA.BO's competition here