55 North Mining Inc.
55 North Mining Inc. FFF.CN Peers
See (FFF.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFF.CN | $0.02 | N/A | 2.40M | -1.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | $69.58 | +2.37% | 77.44B | 11.39 | $6.11 | +2.01% |
| AEM.TO | $148.66 | +1.56% | 75.15B | 23.12 | $6.43 | +1.50% |
| WPM.TO | $110.00 | +2.91% | 49.90B | 58.20 | $1.89 | +0.80% |
| ABX.TO | $25.08 | +1.81% | 43.12B | 13.63 | $1.84 | +2.24% |
| FNV.TO | $222.09 | +2.31% | 42.77B | 50.36 | $4.41 | +0.66% |
| K.TO | $19.19 | +1.80% | 23.61B | 14.01 | $1.37 | +0.87% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | $34.28 | +3.07% | 14.42B | 39.86 | $0.86 | +0.41% |
| LUG.TO | $56.42 | +2.17% | 13.57B | 19.13 | $2.95 | +1.42% |
Stock Comparison
FFF.CN vs NGT.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 77.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NGT.TO trades at $69.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs AEM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 75.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while AEM.TO trades at $148.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs WPM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 49.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while WPM.TO trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 58.20. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ABX.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 43.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ABX.TO trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs FNV.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 42.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while FNV.TO trades at $222.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs K.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 23.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while K.TO trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NCM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs AGI.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while AGI.TO trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs LUG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 13.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while LUG.TO trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs EDV.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while EDV.TO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -65.25. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs YRI.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs OR.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while OR.TO trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 134.58. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs BTO.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while BTO.TO trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ELD.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ELD.TO trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs IMG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while IMG.TO trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NGD.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NGD.TO trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs PRU.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while PRU.TO trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs OLA.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while OLA.TO trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs OGC.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while OGC.TO trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs EQX.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while EQX.TO trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs TXG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while TXG.TO trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SSL.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SSL.TO trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 81.29. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs DPM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while DPM.TO trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs KNT.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while KNT.TO trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SSRM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SSRM.TO trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CEE.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs WDO.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while WDO.TO trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CXB.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CXB.TO trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs WGX.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while WGX.TO trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ORA.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ORA.TO trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CG.TO trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NG.TO trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -26.21. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs AAUC.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while AAUC.TO trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs OSK.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SEA.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SEA.TO trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -46.31. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SBB.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs KRR.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CNL.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CNL.TO trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs RUP.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while RUP.TO trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -157.33. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs GTWO.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 716.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while GTWO.TO trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs MSA.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 716.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while MSA.TO trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs AR.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ORE.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 546.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ORE.TO trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ASE.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 526.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ASE.CN trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs MND.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 455.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while MND.TO trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs GAU.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 455.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while GAU.TO trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SGD.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs PRB.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 416.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while PRB.TO trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs FDR.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 395.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while FDR.V trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs MOZ.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs IAU.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 319.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while IAU.TO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs JAG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 254.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while JAG.TO trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SBI.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 253.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SBI.TO trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs STGO.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 212.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while STGO.TO trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs GOLD.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 209.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs DNG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 198.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while DNG.TO trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ITH.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 193.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ITH.TO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs FF.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 178.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while FF.TO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs VGZ.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 163.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs LN.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 137.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while LN.TO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs LGD.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 129.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while LGD.TO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs TNX.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs STLR.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 125.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while STLR.TO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SANU.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 122.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SANU.CN trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs GHRT.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 115.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while GHRT.V trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs COG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NEXG.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 103.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NEXG.V trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs MAW.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs G.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 96.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while G.TO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs BSX.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 93.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while BSX.TO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs XTG.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 92.49M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while XTG.TO trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 201.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CBR.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 91.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CBR.V trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ELO.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 87.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ELO.TO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CCM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 66.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CCM.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs HMR.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 65.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while HMR.V trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs TML.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs CGC.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 63.87M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CGC.V trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs BLLG.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 60.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ME.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs VEIN.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 49.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while VEIN.V trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs USGD.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 44.91M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while USGD.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NHK.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs BNN.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs ESM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 34.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while ESM.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NVO.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NVO.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and NVO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs VLC.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs VGCX.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs SGNL.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs AMM.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 28.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while AMM.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs GTCH.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 26.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs GRC.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 24.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while GRC.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and GRC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs VAU.V Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 20.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while VAU.V trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and VAU.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs PME.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 18.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while PME.TO trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs CTOC.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs YRB.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and YRB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FFF.CN vs SGLD.TO Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs NOM.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 16.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while NOM.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 15.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFF.CN.
FFF.CN vs IRV.CN Comparison
FFF.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFF.CN stands at 2.40M. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 14.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FFF.CN is priced at $0.02, while IRV.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.50, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, FFF.CN's ROE is +0.72%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFF.CN and IRV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).