First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FFA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFA | $20.67 | +0.58% | 414.6M | 5.47 | $3.79 | +6.75% |
| PONAX | $10.82 | +0.84% | 187.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PONPX | $10.82 | +0.84% | 187.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PIMIX | $10.82 | +0.84% | 187.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CWGFX | $71.11 | +0.31% | 135.2B | 22.84 | $3.06 | N/A |
| CWGIX | $71.33 | +0.32% | 135.2B | 22.84 | $3.07 | N/A |
| RWICX | $70.68 | +0.31% | 135.2B | 22.03 | $3.16 | N/A |
| CWIAX | $70.99 | +0.33% | 135.2B | 22.03 | $3.17 | N/A |
| AMECX | $26.70 | +0.53% | 134.3B | 19.21 | $1.38 | +3.78% |
| IFAFX | $26.60 | +0.53% | 134.3B | 18.28 | $1.44 | +3.72% |
Stock Comparison
FFA vs PONAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PONAX has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PONAX trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PONAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PONAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PONAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PONAX's competition here
FFA vs PONPX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PONPX has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PONPX trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PONPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PONPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PONPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PONPX's competition here
FFA vs PIMIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PIMIX has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PIMIX trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PIMIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PIMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PIMIX's competition here
FFA vs CWGFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CWGFX has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CWGFX trades at $71.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CWGFX's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CWGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CWGFX's competition here
FFA vs CWGIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CWGIX has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CWGIX trades at $71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CWGIX's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CWGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CWGIX's competition here
FFA vs RWICX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, RWICX has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while RWICX trades at $70.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas RWICX's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to RWICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check RWICX's competition here
FFA vs CWIAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CWIAX has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CWIAX trades at $70.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CWIAX's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CWIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CWIAX's competition here
FFA vs AMECX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, AMECX has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while AMECX trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas AMECX's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMECX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to AMECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check AMECX's competition here
FFA vs IFAFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, IFAFX has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while IFAFX trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas IFAFX's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IFAFX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to IFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check IFAFX's competition here
FFA vs RIDGX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, RIDGX has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while RIDGX trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas RIDGX's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to RIDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check RIDGX's competition here
FFA vs CIRAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CIRAX has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CIRAX trades at $76.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CIRAX's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIRAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CIRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CIRAX's competition here
FFA vs RIRGX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, RIRGX has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while RIRGX trades at $76.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas RIRGX's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIRGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to RIRGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check RIRGX's competition here
FFA vs CAIBX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CAIBX has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CAIBX trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CAIBX's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAIBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CAIBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CAIBX's competition here
FFA vs CIBFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CIBFX has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CIBFX trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CIBFX's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CIBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CIBFX's competition here
FFA vs DODIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, DODIX has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while DODIX trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas DODIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DODIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to DODIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check DODIX's competition here
FFA vs FKINX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FKINX has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FKINX trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FKINX's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FKINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FKINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FKINX's competition here
FFA vs FNCFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FNCFX has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FNCFX trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FNCFX's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FNCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FNCFX's competition here
FFA vs VEIPX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VEIPX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VEIPX trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VEIPX's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VEIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VEIPX's competition here
FFA vs VEIRX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VEIRX has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VEIRX trades at $93.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VEIRX's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEIRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VEIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VEIRX's competition here
FFA vs VWIAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VWIAX has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VWIAX trades at $62.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VWIAX's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VWIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VWIAX's competition here
FFA vs VWINX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VWINX has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VWINX trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VWINX's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VWINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VWINX's competition here
FFA vs OIEJX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, OIEJX has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while OIEJX trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas OIEJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OIEJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to OIEJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check OIEJX's competition here
FFA vs HLIEX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HLIEX has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HLIEX trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HLIEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLIEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HLIEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HLIEX's competition here
FFA vs LDLVX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, LDLVX has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while LDLVX trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas LDLVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LDLVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to LDLVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check LDLVX's competition here
FFA vs LLDYX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, LLDYX has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while LLDYX trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas LLDYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LLDYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to LLDYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check LLDYX's competition here
FFA vs JEPI Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JEPI has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JEPI trades at $55.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JEPI's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is less volatile compared to JEPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JEPI's competition here
FFA vs VTINX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VTINX has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VTINX trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VTINX's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VTINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VTINX's competition here
FFA vs JPST Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JPST has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JPST trades at $50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JPST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JPST's competition here
FFA vs JEPQ Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JEPQ has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JEPQ trades at $54.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JEPQ's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEPQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is less volatile compared to JEPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JEPQ's competition here
FFA vs AHTFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, AHTFX has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while AHTFX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas AHTFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHTFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to AHTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check AHTFX's competition here
FFA vs PRFDX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PRFDX has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PRFDX trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PRFDX's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRFDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PRFDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PRFDX's competition here
FFA vs TIBIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIBIX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIBIX trades at $30.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIBIX's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIBIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIBIX's competition here
FFA vs TIBMX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIBMX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIBMX trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIBMX's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIBMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIBMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIBMX's competition here
FFA vs TIBGX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIBGX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIBGX trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIBGX's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIBGX's competition here
FFA vs TIBAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIBAX has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIBAX trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIBAX's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIBAX's competition here
FFA vs TIBRX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIBRX has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIBRX trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIBRX's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIBRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIBRX's competition here
FFA vs TIBCX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIBCX has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIBCX trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIBCX's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIBCX's competition here
FFA vs GAIFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, GAIFX has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while GAIFX trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas GAIFX's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GAIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to GAIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check GAIFX's competition here
FFA vs MIAWX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, MIAWX has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while MIAWX trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas MIAWX's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIAWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to MIAWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check MIAWX's competition here
FFA vs IGIFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, IGIFX has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while IGIFX trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas IGIFX's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IGIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to IGIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check IGIFX's competition here
FFA vs COSIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, COSIX has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while COSIX trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas COSIX's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to COSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check COSIX's competition here
FFA vs VQNPX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VQNPX has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VQNPX trades at $68.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VQNPX's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VQNPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VQNPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VQNPX's competition here
FFA vs VGIAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, VGIAX has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while VGIAX trades at $111.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas VGIAX's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VGIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to VGIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check VGIAX's competition here
FFA vs PRCIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PRCIX has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PRCIX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PRCIX's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PRCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PRCIX's competition here
FFA vs PRXEX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PRXEX has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PRXEX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PRXEX's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRXEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PRXEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PRXEX's competition here
FFA vs BLPFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, BLPFX has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while BLPFX trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas BLPFX's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to BLPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check BLPFX's competition here
FFA vs FFRHX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FFRHX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FFRHX trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FFRHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FFRHX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FFRHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FFRHX's competition here
FFA vs FADMX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FADMX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FADMX trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FADMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FADMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FADMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FADMX's competition here
FFA vs FAGIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FAGIX has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FAGIX trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FAGIX's competition here
FFA vs PFIIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PFIIX has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PFIIX trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PFIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PFIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PFIIX's competition here
FFA vs PFIAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PFIAX has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PFIAX trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PFIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PFIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PFIAX's competition here
FFA vs FLTMX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FLTMX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FLTMX trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FLTMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLTMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FLTMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FLTMX's competition here
FFA vs ABHFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, ABHFX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while ABHFX trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas ABHFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to ABHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check ABHFX's competition here
FFA vs ACEIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, ACEIX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while ACEIX trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas ACEIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACEIX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to ACEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check ACEIX's competition here
FFA vs FGRIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FGRIX has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FGRIX trades at $69.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FGRIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGRIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FGRIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FGRIX's competition here
FFA vs HBLVX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HBLVX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HBLVX trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HBLVX's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBLVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HBLVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HBLVX's competition here
FFA vs HBLTX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HBLTX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HBLTX trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HBLTX's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBLTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HBLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HBLTX's competition here
FFA vs HBLRX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HBLRX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HBLRX trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HBLRX's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBLRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HBLRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HBLRX's competition here
FFA vs ESIIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, ESIIX has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while ESIIX trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas ESIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to ESIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check ESIIX's competition here
FFA vs JSOAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JSOAX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JSOAX trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JSOAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSOAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JSOAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JSOAX's competition here
FFA vs TSIIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TSIIX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TSIIX trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TSIIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TSIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TSIIX's competition here
FFA vs PQIAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PQIAX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PQIAX trades at $41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PQIAX's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PQIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to PQIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PQIAX's competition here
FFA vs FEQIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FEQIX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FEQIX trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FEQIX's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FEQIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FEQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FEQIX's competition here
FFA vs INPFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, INPFX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while INPFX trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas INPFX's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to INPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check INPFX's competition here
FFA vs JDNAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JDNAX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JDNAX trades at $76.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JDNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JDNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JDNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JDNAX's competition here
FFA vs JADGX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JADGX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JADGX trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JADGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JADGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JADGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JADGX's competition here
FFA vs JDNNX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JDNNX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JDNNX trades at $77.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JDNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JDNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JDNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JDNNX's competition here
FFA vs JDNRX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JDNRX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JDNRX trades at $76.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JDNRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JDNRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JDNRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JDNRX's competition here
FFA vs JGICX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JGICX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JGICX trades at $75.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JGICX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JGICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JGICX's competition here
FFA vs JGINX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JGINX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JGINX trades at $77.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JGINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGINX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JGINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JGINX's competition here
FFA vs JAGIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JAGIX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JAGIX trades at $77.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JAGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JAGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JAGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JAGIX's competition here
FFA vs CPXAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, CPXAX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while CPXAX trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas CPXAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPXAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to CPXAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check CPXAX's competition here
FFA vs FZOLX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FZOLX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FZOLX trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FZOLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FZOLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FZOLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FZOLX's competition here
FFA vs PDI Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, PDI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while PDI trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas PDI's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PDI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is less volatile compared to PDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check PDI's competition here
FFA vs TRGIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TRGIX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TRGIX trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TRGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TRGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TRGIX's competition here
FFA vs TGIHX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TGIHX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TGIHX trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TGIHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGIHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TGIHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TGIHX's competition here
FFA vs TIIRX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TIIRX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TIIRX trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TIIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TIIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TIIRX's competition here
FFA vs DFCF Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, DFCF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while DFCF trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas DFCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is less volatile compared to DFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check DFCF's competition here
FFA vs FEQTX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FEQTX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FEQTX trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FEQTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FEQTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FEQTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FEQTX's competition here
FFA vs FETKX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FETKX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FETKX trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FETKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FETKX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FETKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FETKX's competition here
FFA vs AEUDX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, AEUDX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while AEUDX trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas AEUDX's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEUDX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to AEUDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check AEUDX's competition here
FFA vs TWEIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TWEIX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TWEIX trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TWEIX's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWEIX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TWEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TWEIX's competition here
FFA vs DLFNX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, DLFNX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while DLFNX trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas DLFNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLFNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to DLFNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check DLFNX's competition here
FFA vs NSTLX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, NSTLX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while NSTLX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas NSTLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSTLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to NSTLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check NSTLX's competition here
FFA vs JEPAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JEPAX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JEPAX trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JEPAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEPAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JEPAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JEPAX's competition here
FFA vs HFQTX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HFQTX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HFQTX trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HFQTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HFQTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HFQTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HFQTX's competition here
FFA vs HFQCX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HFQCX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HFQCX trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HFQCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HFQCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HFQCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HFQCX's competition here
FFA vs HFQRX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HFQRX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HFQRX trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HFQRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HFQRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HFQRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HFQRX's competition here
FFA vs HFQAX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HFQAX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HFQAX trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HFQAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HFQAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HFQAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HFQAX's competition here
FFA vs HFQSX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HFQSX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HFQSX trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HFQSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HFQSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HFQSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HFQSX's competition here
FFA vs HFQIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, HFQIX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while HFQIX trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas HFQIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HFQIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to HFQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check HFQIX's competition here
FFA vs OAKBX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, OAKBX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while OAKBX trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas OAKBX's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OAKBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to OAKBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check OAKBX's competition here
FFA vs FCONX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, FCONX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while FCONX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas FCONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to FCONX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check FCONX's competition here
FFA vs RPSIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, RPSIX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while RPSIX trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas RPSIX's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to RPSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check RPSIX's competition here
FFA vs DFIGX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, DFIGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while DFIGX trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas DFIGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFIGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to DFIGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check DFIGX's competition here
FFA vs TAIFX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, TAIFX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while TAIFX trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas TAIFX's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TAIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to TAIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check TAIFX's competition here
FFA vs JMTNX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JMTNX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JMTNX trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JMTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JMTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JMTNX's competition here
FFA vs JMUTX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JMUTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JMUTX trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JMUTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMUTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JMUTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JMUTX's competition here
FFA vs JMUIX Comparison August 2025
FFA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFA stands at 414.6M. In comparison, JMUIX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFA is priced at $20.67, while JMUIX trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.47, whereas JMUIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMUIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFA is more volatile compared to JMUIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFA.Check JMUIX's competition here