Fevertree Drinks PLC

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, 0K34.L has a market cap of 61.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while 0K34.L trades at $61.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas 0K34.L's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0K34.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is less volatile compared to 0K34.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, 0Z62.L has a market cap of 46.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while 0Z62.L trades at $34.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas 0Z62.L's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0Z62.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to 0Z62.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, CCEP.L has a market cap of 31.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while CCEP.L trades at $6,750.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CCEP.L's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCEP.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to CCEP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, CCH.L has a market cap of 13.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while CCH.L trades at $3,808.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CCH.L's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCH.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to CCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, 0I0T.L has a market cap of 10.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while 0I0T.L trades at $1,150.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas 0I0T.L's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0I0T.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to 0I0T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, 0K50.L has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while 0K50.L trades at $44.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas 0K50.L's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0K50.L's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to 0K50.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, BVIC.L has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while BVIC.L trades at $1,313.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BVIC.L's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BVIC.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to BVIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, BAG.L has a market cap of 783.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while BAG.L trades at $704.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BAG.L's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to BAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.

FEVR.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEVR.L stands at 1.04B. In comparison, NICL.L has a market cap of 474.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FEVR.L is priced at $848.00, while NICL.L trades at $1,300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEVR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NICL.L's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, FEVR.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NICL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FEVR.L is more volatile compared to NICL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEVR.L.