Future Enterprises Limited

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, VMM.NS has a market cap of 574.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while VMM.NS trades at ₹123.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VMM.NS's P/E ratio is 73.63. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to VMM.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to VMM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check VMM.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, VMART.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while VMART.NS trades at ₹569.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VMART.NS's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to VMART.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to VMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check VMART.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, VMART.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while VMART.BO trades at ₹567.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VMART.BO's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to VMART.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to VMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check VMART.BO's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, SHOPERSTOP.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while SHOPERSTOP.BO trades at ₹316.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SHOPERSTOP.BO's P/E ratio is -199.47. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to SHOPERSTOP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to SHOPERSTOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check SHOPERSTOP.BO's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, SHOPERSTOP.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while SHOPERSTOP.NS trades at ₹315.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SHOPERSTOP.NS's P/E ratio is -197.89. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to SHOPERSTOP.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to SHOPERSTOP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check SHOPERSTOP.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, PATELRMART.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while PATELRMART.NS trades at ₹179.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PATELRMART.NS's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to PATELRMART.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to PATELRMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check PATELRMART.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, SPENCERS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while SPENCERS.NS trades at ₹33.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPENCERS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to SPENCERS.NS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to SPENCERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check SPENCERS.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, SPENCERS.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while SPENCERS.BO trades at ₹33.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPENCERS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to SPENCERS.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to SPENCERS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check SPENCERS.BO's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, FRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while FRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to FRETAIL.BO's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is more volatile compared to FRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check FRETAIL.BO's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, OSIAHYPER.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while OSIAHYPER.NS trades at ₹9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OSIAHYPER.NS's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to OSIAHYPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is less volatile compared to OSIAHYPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check OSIAHYPER.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, FRETAIL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while FRETAIL.NS trades at ₹2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FRETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to FRETAIL.NS's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is more volatile compared to FRETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check FRETAIL.NS's competition here

FEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FEL.NS stands at 378.1M. In comparison, FELDVR.NS has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FEL.NS is priced at ₹0.43, while FELDVR.NS trades at ₹2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FELDVR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FEL.NS's ROE is +1.96%, compared to FELDVR.NS's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FEL.NS is more volatile compared to FELDVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FEL.NS.Check FELDVR.NS's competition here