Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE
Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE (FDVWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FDVWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDVWF | $88.70 | -10.67% | 1.8B | 21.74 | $4.08 | +0.40% |
| ENBGF | $18.26 | +0.00% | 111.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.44% |
| EBBNF | $24.30 | +0.41% | 95.5B | 10.95 | $2.22 | +6.03% |
| TCANF | $14.33 | +165.86% | 71.1B | 5.64 | $2.54 | +2.44% |
| TNCAF | $14.75 | +0.00% | 60.5B | 5.81 | $2.54 | +5.53% |
| EBGEF | $25.10 | -0.61% | 54.8B | 11.31 | $2.22 | +6.66% |
| EBBGF | $24.60 | +0.00% | 53.5B | 11.04 | $2.22 | +6.84% |
| ENNPF | $18.11 | +0.00% | 39.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.66% |
| ENBRF | $16.50 | +0.00% | 36B | N/A | N/A | +6.59% |
| EBRGF | $15.73 | +0.00% | 34.3B | N/A | N/A | +5.96% |
Stock Comparison
FDVWF vs ENBGF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while ENBGF trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check ENBGF's competition here
FDVWF vs EBBNF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while EBBNF trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check EBBNF's competition here
FDVWF vs TCANF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while TCANF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and TCANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCANF's competition here
FDVWF vs TNCAF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while TNCAF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check TNCAF's competition here
FDVWF vs EBGEF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while EBGEF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check EBGEF's competition here
FDVWF vs EBBGF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while EBBGF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check EBBGF's competition here
FDVWF vs ENNPF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while ENNPF trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check ENNPF's competition here
FDVWF vs ENBRF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while ENBRF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check ENBRF's competition here
FDVWF vs EBRGF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while EBRGF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and EBRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRGF's competition here
FDVWF vs EBRZF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while EBRZF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check EBRZF's competition here
FDVWF vs MPLXP Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and MPLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPLXP's competition here
FDVWF vs SOCGM Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while SOCGM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FDVWF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SOCGM has daily volatility of N/A.Check SOCGM's competition here
FDVWF vs PPLAF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while PPLAF trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check PPLAF's competition here
FDVWF vs PBNAF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while PBNAF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and PBNAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBNAF's competition here
FDVWF vs PMMBF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while PMMBF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check PMMBF's competition here
FDVWF vs PMBPF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while PMBPF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and PMBPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMBPF's competition here
FDVWF vs KEYUF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while KEYUF trades at $39.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check KEYUF's competition here
FDVWF vs FRVWY Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while FRVWY trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check FRVWY's competition here
FDVWF vs VOPKF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while VOPKF trades at $56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check VOPKF's competition here
FDVWF vs VOPKY Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while VOPKY trades at $56.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and VOPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOPKY's competition here
FDVWF vs EQTNP Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check EQTNP's competition here
FDVWF vs GBNXF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while GBNXF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check GBNXF's competition here
FDVWF vs TPZEF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while TPZEF trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check TPZEF's competition here
FDVWF vs SOCGP Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while SOCGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FDVWF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SOCGP has daily volatility of N/A.Check SOCGP's competition here
FDVWF vs SPKOY Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while SPKOY trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and SPKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPKOY's competition here
FDVWF vs SNPKF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 946.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and SNPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNPKF's competition here
FDVWF vs TWMIF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while TWMIF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check TWMIF's competition here
FDVWF vs OGSRW Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check OGSRW's competition here
FDVWF vs TTNN Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while TTNN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check TTNN's competition here
FDVWF vs MRGE Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and MRGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRGE's competition here
FDVWF vs CWPE Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 673.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while CWPE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check CWPE's competition here
FDVWF vs LOGL Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check LOGL's competition here
FDVWF vs GMLPF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while GMLPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check GMLPF's competition here
FDVWF vs AVACF Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while AVACF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check AVACF's competition here
FDVWF vs FLST Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 442. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDVWF.Check FLST's competition here
FDVWF vs TIDE Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and TIDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIDE's competition here
FDVWF vs ENGY Comparison March 2026
FDVWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDVWF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ENGY has a market cap of 196. Regarding current trading prices, FDVWF is priced at $88.70, while ENGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDVWF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.74, whereas ENGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDVWF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDVWF and ENGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGY's competition here