FactSet Research Systems Inc.

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SPGI has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while SPGI trades at $411.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SPGI's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to SPGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check SPGI's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CME has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while CME trades at $311.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CME's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to CME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check CME's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ICE has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while ICE trades at $153.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ICE's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ICE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to ICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check ICE's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MCO has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while MCO trades at $441.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MCO's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to MCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check MCO's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NDAQ has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while NDAQ trades at $79.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NDAQ's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDAQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to NDAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check NDAQ's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, COIN has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while COIN trades at $163.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas COIN's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to COIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check COIN's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MSCI has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while MSCI trades at $539.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MSCI's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MSCI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to MSCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check MSCI's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CBOE has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while CBOE trades at $291.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CBOE's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CBOE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to CBOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check CBOE's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MORN has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while MORN trades at $157.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MORN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MORN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to MORN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check MORN's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DNB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while DNB trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DNB's P/E ratio is -101.67. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to DNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check DNB's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VALU has a market cap of 346M. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while VALU trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas VALU's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VALU's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to VALU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check VALU's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $193.05, while BTOG trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check BTOG's competition here