Focus Graphite Inc.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while BHPLF trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 102.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while RTNTF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while GLCNF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while GLNCY trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -26.93. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while NGLOY trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AAUKF trades at $28.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while FSUMF trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while FSUGY trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while CMCLF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while IVPAF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while BDNNY trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while IPOAF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while SMMYY trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while STMNF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PUTKY trades at $26.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while LYSDY trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while LYSCF trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PILBF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MALRY trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MALRF trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while NGXXF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -35.58. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while SOUHY trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ERMAY trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while NICMF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while DETRF trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ILKAY trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while LINRF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while FMCXF trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ILKAF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while BQSSF trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.75. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 890.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ADTLF trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 875.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ATUSF trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 818.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 818.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ADMLF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 703.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AMVMF trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 639.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while VULNF trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 560.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 480.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MJDLF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 469.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ALMTF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 374.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while REEMF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 369.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 346.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ERLFF trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 334.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MNXMF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -58.20. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MLYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 317.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 314.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while MLXEF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 284.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while SVMLF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 283.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 281.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 262.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while FWEDF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 259.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PMETF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while STQNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 234.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while EMOTF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 232.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while ERDCF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -64.15. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while CILLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.

FCSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCSMF stands at 4.57M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 229.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FCSMF is priced at $0.06, while SYAAF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.85, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FCSMF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FCSMF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCSMF.