Future Consumer Ltd
Future Consumer Ltd (FCONSUMER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FCONSUMER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCONSUMER.NS | ₹0.36 | +0.00% | 718.9M | -2.00 | -₹0.18 | N/A |
| DODLA.NS | ₹1,155.90 | +0.00% | 70.1B | 35.81 | ₹32.47 | +0.17% |
| DODLA.BO | ₹1,156.15 | +0.00% | 69.4B | 35.43 | ₹32.49 | +0.17% |
| EMPIND.BO | ₹894.50 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 14.50 | ₹61.60 | +2.80% |
| SVJ.BO | ₹556.00 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 1015.77 | ₹0.52 | N/A |
| AVEER.BO | ₹511.00 | -3.78% | 2.1B | 55.06 | ₹9.28 | +0.05% |
| NEAGI.BO | ₹3,305.05 | +0.15% | 2.1B | 7.88 | ₹419.32 | +0.91% |
| ESSENTIA.BO | ₹1.47 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 47.33 | ₹0.03 | N/A |
| FRSHTRP.BO | ₹134.90 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 129.09 | ₹1.05 | N/A |
| PURETROP.BO | ₹182.50 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 65.25 | ₹2.80 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FCONSUMER.NS vs DODLA.NS Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, DODLA.NS has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while DODLA.NS trades at ₹1,155.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DODLA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DODLA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to DODLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check DODLA.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs DODLA.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, DODLA.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while DODLA.BO trades at ₹1,156.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DODLA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DODLA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to DODLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check DODLA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs EMPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, EMPIND.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while EMPIND.BO trades at ₹894.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EMPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMPIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to EMPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check EMPIND.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SVJ.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, SVJ.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while SVJ.BO trades at ₹556.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SVJ.BO's P/E ratio is 1015.77. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVJ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to SVJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SVJ.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs AVEER.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, AVEER.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while AVEER.BO trades at ₹511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 55.06. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVEER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to AVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check AVEER.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NEAGI.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, NEAGI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while NEAGI.BO trades at ₹3,305.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NEAGI.BO's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEAGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to NEAGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NEAGI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ESSENTIA.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, ESSENTIA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while ESSENTIA.BO trades at ₹1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ESSENTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 47.33. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESSENTIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ESSENTIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ESSENTIA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs FRSHTRP.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, FRSHTRP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while FRSHTRP.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FRSHTRP.BO's P/E ratio is 129.09. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRSHTRP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to FRSHTRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check FRSHTRP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs PURETROP.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, PURETROP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while PURETROP.BO trades at ₹182.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PURETROP.BO's P/E ratio is 65.25. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PURETROP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to PURETROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check PURETROP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs BENGALT.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, BENGALT.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while BENGALT.BO trades at ₹157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BENGALT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BENGALT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check BENGALT.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANIKINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while ANIKINDS.NS trades at ₹47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ANIKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.96. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANIKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ANIKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANIKINDS.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANIKINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while ANIKINDS.BO trades at ₹48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ANIKINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.11. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANIKINDS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to ANIKINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANIKINDS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs JAMESWARREN.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, JAMESWARREN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while JAMESWARREN.BO trades at ₹311.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JAMESWARREN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to JAMESWARREN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check JAMESWARREN.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs HALDER.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, HALDER.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while HALDER.BO trades at ₹263.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HALDER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HALDER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to HALDER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check HALDER.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TANVI.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, TANVI.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while TANVI.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TANVI.BO's P/E ratio is 217.31. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TANVI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to TANVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TANVI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MRP.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, MRP.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while MRP.BO trades at ₹92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MRP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to MRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MRP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TIGLOB.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, TIGLOB.BO has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while TIGLOB.BO trades at ₹192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TIGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIGLOB.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to TIGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TIGLOB.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs LYKISLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, LYKISLTD.BO has a market cap of 902.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while LYKISLTD.BO trades at ₹47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LYKISLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYKISLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to LYKISLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check LYKISLTD.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MODAIRY.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, MODAIRY.BO has a market cap of 818.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while MODAIRY.BO trades at ₹33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MODAIRY.BO's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MODAIRY.BO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to MODAIRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MODAIRY.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TERAI.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, TERAI.BO has a market cap of 728.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while TERAI.BO trades at ₹105.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TERAI.BO's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TERAI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to TERAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TERAI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs IBINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, IBINFO.BO has a market cap of 645.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while IBINFO.BO trades at ₹480.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IBINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBINFO.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to IBINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check IBINFO.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs JFL.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, JFL.BO has a market cap of 558.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while JFL.BO trades at ₹37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JFL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JFL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to JFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check JFL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs UNIQUEO.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, UNIQUEO.BO has a market cap of 552.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while UNIQUEO.BO trades at ₹92.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UNIQUEO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIQUEO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to UNIQUEO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check UNIQUEO.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANVRDHI.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, ANVRDHI.BO has a market cap of 447.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while ANVRDHI.BO trades at ₹9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ANVRDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANVRDHI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ANVRDHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANVRDHI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SWOEF.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, SWOEF.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while SWOEF.BO trades at ₹13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SWOEF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWOEF.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to SWOEF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SWOEF.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs APIS.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, APIS.BO has a market cap of 356.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while APIS.BO trades at ₹67.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas APIS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.77. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APIS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to APIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check APIS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SPECFOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, SPECFOOD.BO has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while SPECFOOD.BO trades at ₹14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SPECFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -79.56. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPECFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS and SPECFOOD.BO have similar daily volatility (5.56).Check SPECFOOD.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs CONTILI.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, CONTILI.BO has a market cap of 345.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while CONTILI.BO trades at ₹21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CONTILI.BO's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CONTILI.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to CONTILI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check CONTILI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs CHORDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, CHORDIA.BO has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while CHORDIA.BO trades at ₹71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CHORDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 47.18. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHORDIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to CHORDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check CHORDIA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs KMGMILK.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, KMGMILK.BO has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while KMGMILK.BO trades at ₹46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KMGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 112.34. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMGMILK.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to KMGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check KMGMILK.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs WORL.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, WORL.BO has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while WORL.BO trades at ₹7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WORL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WORL.BO's ROE of -14.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to WORL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check WORL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs HEALTHYLIFE.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, HEALTHYLIFE.BO has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while HEALTHYLIFE.BO trades at ₹9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HEALTHYLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check HEALTHYLIFE.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs VIKASWSP.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, VIKASWSP.BO has a market cap of 226.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while VIKASWSP.BO trades at ₹1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VIKASWSP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIKASWSP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to VIKASWSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check VIKASWSP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SCAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, SCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while SCAGRO.BO trades at ₹34.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 241.67. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to SCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SCAGRO.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs JETMALL.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, JETMALL.BO has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while JETMALL.BO trades at ₹34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JETMALL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JETMALL.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to JETMALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check JETMALL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NMSRESRC.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, NMSRESRC.BO has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while NMSRESRC.BO trades at ₹59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NMSRESRC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMSRESRC.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to NMSRESRC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NMSRESRC.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NCCBLUE.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, NCCBLUE.BO has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while NCCBLUE.BO trades at ₹23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NCCBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCCBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to NCCBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NCCBLUE.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANSINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, ANSINDUS.BO has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while ANSINDUS.BO trades at ₹17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ANSINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANSINDUS.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ANSINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANSINDUS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TDSL.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, TDSL.BO has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while TDSL.BO trades at ₹6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TDSL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TDSL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to TDSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TDSL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs UNJHAFOR.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, UNJHAFOR.BO has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while UNJHAFOR.BO trades at ₹22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UNJHAFOR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNJHAFOR.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to UNJHAFOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check UNJHAFOR.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NEWTRAC.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, NEWTRAC.BO has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while NEWTRAC.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NEWTRAC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTRAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to NEWTRAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NEWTRAC.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs UNRYLMA.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, UNRYLMA.BO has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while UNRYLMA.BO trades at ₹14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UNRYLMA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNRYLMA.BO's ROE of +4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to UNRYLMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check UNRYLMA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs OLYOI.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, OLYOI.BO has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while OLYOI.BO trades at ₹27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OLYOI.BO's P/E ratio is -65.61. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OLYOI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to OLYOI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check OLYOI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SHAQUAK.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, SHAQUAK.BO has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while SHAQUAK.BO trades at ₹1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SHAQUAK.BO's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHAQUAK.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to SHAQUAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SHAQUAK.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs THAKKERS.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, THAKKERS.BO has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while THAKKERS.BO trades at ₹21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas THAKKERS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THAKKERS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to THAKKERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check THAKKERS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ICLORGANIC.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, ICLORGANIC.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while ICLORGANIC.BO trades at ₹39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ICLORGANIC.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICLORGANIC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ICLORGANIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ICLORGANIC.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MVKAGRO-ST.NS Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, MVKAGRO-ST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while MVKAGRO-ST.NS trades at ₹576.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MVKAGRO-ST.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MVKAGRO-ST.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TINNATFL.BO Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, TINNATFL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while TINNATFL.BO trades at ₹361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TINNATFL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TINNATFL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to TINNATFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TINNATFL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs HATSUN-RE.NS Comparison February 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 718.9M. In comparison, HATSUN-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.36, while HATSUN-RE.NS trades at ₹480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HATSUN-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HATSUN-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to HATSUN-RE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check HATSUN-RE.NS's competition here