Future Consumer Ltd
Future Consumer Ltd (FCONSUMER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FCONSUMER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCONSUMER.NS | ₹0.31 | -3.13% | 619.1M | -1.24 | -₹0.25 | N/A |
| DODLA.NS | ₹1,030.85 | +2.01% | 62.2B | 31.68 | ₹32.54 | +0.19% |
| DODLA.BO | ₹1,027.60 | +1.65% | 62B | 31.67 | ₹32.45 | +0.19% |
| EMPIND.BO | ₹855.00 | -0.62% | 5.1B | 13.85 | ₹61.73 | +2.92% |
| PROV.NS | ₹1,175.00 | +1.29% | 4B | 44.34 | ₹26.50 | N/A |
| SVJ.BO | ₹483.90 | +2.30% | 2.7B | 930.58 | ₹0.52 | N/A |
| AVEER.BO | ₹512.00 | +0.07% | 2.2B | 55.29 | ₹9.26 | +0.05% |
| MADHUSUDAN.NS | ₹147.75 | +2.64% | 2.1B | 13.52 | ₹10.93 | N/A |
| NEAGI.BO | ₹3,156.70 | +0.00% | 2B | 7.36 | ₹428.73 | +0.95% |
| FRSHTRP.BO | ₹134.90 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 129.09 | ₹1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FCONSUMER.NS vs DODLA.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, DODLA.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while DODLA.NS trades at ₹1,030.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas DODLA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DODLA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to DODLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check DODLA.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs DODLA.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, DODLA.BO has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while DODLA.BO trades at ₹1,027.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas DODLA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DODLA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to DODLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check DODLA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs EMPIND.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, EMPIND.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while EMPIND.BO trades at ₹855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EMPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMPIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to EMPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check EMPIND.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs PROV.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, PROV.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while PROV.NS trades at ₹1,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PROV.NS's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to PROV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check PROV.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SVJ.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, SVJ.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while SVJ.BO trades at ₹483.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SVJ.BO's P/E ratio is 930.58. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVJ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to SVJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SVJ.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs AVEER.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, AVEER.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while AVEER.BO trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas AVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 55.29. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVEER.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to AVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check AVEER.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MADHUSUDAN.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, MADHUSUDAN.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while MADHUSUDAN.NS trades at ₹147.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MADHUSUDAN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MADHUSUDAN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to MADHUSUDAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MADHUSUDAN.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NEAGI.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, NEAGI.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while NEAGI.BO trades at ₹3,156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas NEAGI.BO's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEAGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to NEAGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NEAGI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs FRSHTRP.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, FRSHTRP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while FRSHTRP.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas FRSHTRP.BO's P/E ratio is 129.09. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRSHTRP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to FRSHTRP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check FRSHTRP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs PURETROP.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, PURETROP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while PURETROP.BO trades at ₹186.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas PURETROP.BO's P/E ratio is 66.72. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PURETROP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to PURETROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check PURETROP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs BENGALT.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, BENGALT.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while BENGALT.BO trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas BENGALT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BENGALT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check BENGALT.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ESSENTIA.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, ESSENTIA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while ESSENTIA.BO trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ESSENTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESSENTIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to ESSENTIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ESSENTIA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs HALDER.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, HALDER.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while HALDER.BO trades at ₹255.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas HALDER.BO's P/E ratio is 3198.13. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HALDER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to HALDER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check HALDER.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANIKINDS.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while ANIKINDS.BO trades at ₹37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ANIKINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 60.95. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANIKINDS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to ANIKINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANIKINDS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANIKINDS.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while ANIKINDS.NS trades at ₹36.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ANIKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 60.64. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANIKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to ANIKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANIKINDS.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MRP.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, MRP.BO has a market cap of 994.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while MRP.BO trades at ₹89.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MRP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to MRP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MRP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs JAMESWARREN.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, JAMESWARREN.BO has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while JAMESWARREN.BO trades at ₹267.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas JAMESWARREN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to JAMESWARREN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check JAMESWARREN.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TIGLOB.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, TIGLOB.BO has a market cap of 899.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while TIGLOB.BO trades at ₹177.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TIGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIGLOB.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to TIGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TIGLOB.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs LYKISLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, LYKISLTD.BO has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while LYKISLTD.BO trades at ₹46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas LYKISLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LYKISLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to LYKISLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check LYKISLTD.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MODAIRY.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, MODAIRY.BO has a market cap of 833.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while MODAIRY.BO trades at ₹32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MODAIRY.BO's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MODAIRY.BO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to MODAIRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MODAIRY.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TANVI.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, TANVI.BO has a market cap of 789M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while TANVI.BO trades at ₹61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TANVI.BO's P/E ratio is 157.69. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TANVI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to TANVI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TANVI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs IBINFO.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, IBINFO.BO has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while IBINFO.BO trades at ₹594.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas IBINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBINFO.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to IBINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check IBINFO.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TERAI.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, TERAI.BO has a market cap of 691.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while TERAI.BO trades at ₹100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TERAI.BO's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TERAI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to TERAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TERAI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs UNIQUEO.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, UNIQUEO.BO has a market cap of 450M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while UNIQUEO.BO trades at ₹75.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas UNIQUEO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIQUEO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to UNIQUEO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check UNIQUEO.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANVRDHI.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, ANVRDHI.BO has a market cap of 449.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while ANVRDHI.BO trades at ₹9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ANVRDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANVRDHI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to ANVRDHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANVRDHI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs CONTILI.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, CONTILI.BO has a market cap of 449M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while CONTILI.BO trades at ₹29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CONTILI.BO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CONTILI.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to CONTILI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check CONTILI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs JFL.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, JFL.BO has a market cap of 439.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while JFL.BO trades at ₹28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas JFL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JFL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to JFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check JFL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SWOEF.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, SWOEF.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while SWOEF.BO trades at ₹13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SWOEF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWOEF.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to SWOEF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SWOEF.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs APIS.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, APIS.BO has a market cap of 349.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while APIS.BO trades at ₹63.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas APIS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APIS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to APIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check APIS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SPECFOOD.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, SPECFOOD.BO has a market cap of 302.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while SPECFOOD.BO trades at ₹12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SPECFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -1249.00. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPECFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to SPECFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SPECFOOD.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs CHORDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, CHORDIA.BO has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while CHORDIA.BO trades at ₹68.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas CHORDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHORDIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to CHORDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check CHORDIA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs KMGMILK.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, KMGMILK.BO has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while KMGMILK.BO trades at ₹46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas KMGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is -191.92. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMGMILK.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to KMGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check KMGMILK.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs WORL.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, WORL.BO has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while WORL.BO trades at ₹7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas WORL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WORL.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to WORL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check WORL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs JETMALL.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, JETMALL.BO has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while JETMALL.BO trades at ₹34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas JETMALL.BO's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JETMALL.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to JETMALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check JETMALL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NCCBLUE.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, NCCBLUE.BO has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while NCCBLUE.BO trades at ₹24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas NCCBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCCBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to NCCBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NCCBLUE.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SHANTHALA.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, SHANTHALA.NS has a market cap of 187.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while SHANTHALA.NS trades at ₹28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SHANTHALA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHANTHALA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTHALA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SHANTHALA.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SCAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, SCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while SCAGRO.BO trades at ₹29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 198.67. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to SCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SCAGRO.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NMSRESRC.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, NMSRESRC.BO has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while NMSRESRC.BO trades at ₹59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas NMSRESRC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMSRESRC.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to NMSRESRC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NMSRESRC.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs VIKASWSP.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, VIKASWSP.BO has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while VIKASWSP.BO trades at ₹0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas VIKASWSP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIKASWSP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to VIKASWSP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check VIKASWSP.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs HEALTHYLIFE.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, HEALTHYLIFE.BO has a market cap of 173.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while HEALTHYLIFE.BO trades at ₹7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas HEALTHYLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check HEALTHYLIFE.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ANSINDUS.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, ANSINDUS.BO has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while ANSINDUS.BO trades at ₹17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ANSINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANSINDUS.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ANSINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ANSINDUS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs UNRYLMA.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, UNRYLMA.BO has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while UNRYLMA.BO trades at ₹16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas UNRYLMA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNRYLMA.BO's ROE of +4.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to UNRYLMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check UNRYLMA.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TDSL.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, TDSL.BO has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while TDSL.BO trades at ₹5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TDSL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TDSL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to TDSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TDSL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs UNJHAFOR.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, UNJHAFOR.BO has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while UNJHAFOR.BO trades at ₹20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas UNJHAFOR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNJHAFOR.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to UNJHAFOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check UNJHAFOR.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs NEWTRAC.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, NEWTRAC.BO has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while NEWTRAC.BO trades at ₹4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas NEWTRAC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWTRAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to NEWTRAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check NEWTRAC.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs OLYOI.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, OLYOI.BO has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while OLYOI.BO trades at ₹22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas OLYOI.BO's P/E ratio is -61.65. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OLYOI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to OLYOI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check OLYOI.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs SHAQUAK.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, SHAQUAK.BO has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while SHAQUAK.BO trades at ₹1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas SHAQUAK.BO's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHAQUAK.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is less volatile compared to SHAQUAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check SHAQUAK.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs THAKKERS.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, THAKKERS.BO has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while THAKKERS.BO trades at ₹21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas THAKKERS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THAKKERS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to THAKKERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check THAKKERS.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs TINNATFL.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, TINNATFL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while TINNATFL.BO trades at ₹361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas TINNATFL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TINNATFL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to TINNATFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check TINNATFL.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs ICLORGANIC.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, ICLORGANIC.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while ICLORGANIC.BO trades at ₹39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas ICLORGANIC.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICLORGANIC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to ICLORGANIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check ICLORGANIC.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs HATSUN-RE.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, HATSUN-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while HATSUN-RE.NS trades at ₹480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas HATSUN-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HATSUN-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to HATSUN-RE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check HATSUN-RE.NS's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs EVERTEX.BO Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, EVERTEX.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while EVERTEX.BO trades at ₹64.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas EVERTEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVERTEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to EVERTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check EVERTEX.BO's competition here
FCONSUMER.NS vs MVKAGRO-ST.NS Comparison April 2026
FCONSUMER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCONSUMER.NS stands at 619.1M. In comparison, MVKAGRO-ST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCONSUMER.NS is priced at ₹0.31, while MVKAGRO-ST.NS trades at ₹576.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCONSUMER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.24, whereas MVKAGRO-ST.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCONSUMER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCONSUMER.NS is more volatile compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCONSUMER.NS.Check MVKAGRO-ST.NS's competition here