Four Corners, Inc.
Four Corners, Inc. FCNE Peers
See (FCNE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCNE | $1.77 | -0.20% | 1.92M | -1.11 | -$1.60 | N/A |
| PDYPY | $103.75 | +0.50% | 36.73B | -494.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPF | $205.00 | +1.99% | 36.29B | -476.74 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| ARLUF | $40.84 | +1.10% | 25.54B | 36.46 | $1.12 | +1.23% |
| GXYYY | $20.34 | +1.78% | 17.80B | 15.89 | $1.28 | +1.58% |
| SCHYY | $19.59 | +2.38% | 15.85B | 15.19 | $1.29 | N/A |
| SCHYF | $1.85 | N/A | 14.97B | 14.23 | $0.13 | N/A |
| EVVTY | $67.36 | -1.56% | 13.80B | 10.18 | $6.62 | +4.53% |
| EVGGF | $67.32 | -0.93% | 13.76B | 10.15 | $6.63 | +4.59% |
| GXYEF | $3.05 | N/A | 13.34B | 11.73 | $0.26 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
FCNE vs PDYPY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PDYPY has a market cap of 36.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PDYPY trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PDYPY's P/E ratio is -494.05. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PDYPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PDYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PDYPF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ARLUF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 25.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ARLUF trades at $40.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to ARLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GXYYY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 17.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GXYYY trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SCHYY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 15.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SCHYY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SCHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SCHYF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 14.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SCHYF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SCHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EVVTY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 13.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EVVTY trades at $67.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EVGGF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EVGGF trades at $67.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GXYEF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 13.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GXYEF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GXYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GOFPY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GOFPY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GRKZF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GRKZF has a market cap of 7.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GRKZF trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GRKZF's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GRKZF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GRKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs LTRCF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while LTRCF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to LTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs LFDJF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while LFDJF trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to LFDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GIGNF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GIGNF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GIGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GIGNY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GIGNY trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GIGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GMVHF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GMVHF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GMVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GMVHY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GMVHY trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs MCHVF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while MCHVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to MCHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs WYNMF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while WYNMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to WYNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs WYNMY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while WYNMY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to WYNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PYTCY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PYTCY trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 47.64. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PYTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SKXJF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SKXJF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SKXJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BMRMF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BMRMF trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to BMRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GEBEY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GEBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GEBHY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GEBHY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GEBHF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GEBHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GEBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs KNDGF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to KNDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GMALF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GMALF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GMALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SJMHY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SJMHY trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SJMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SJMHF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SJMHF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SJMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BLBRF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BLBRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to BLBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs NGCRY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while NGCRY trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to NGCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GMALY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GMALY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GMALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs NGCRF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while NGCRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to NGCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PYTCF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PYTCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PYTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BVHBB Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to BVHBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs MDEVF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while MDEVF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to MDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs TABCF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while TABCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to TABCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs TACBY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while TACBY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TACBY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to TACBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs MDEVY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 971.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while MDEVY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to MDEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BJSAF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to BJSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs IRLTY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to IRLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs IRLTF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to IRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs RANKF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 501.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while RANKF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to RANKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs MCHVY Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 484.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while MCHVY trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to MCHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SKYZF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 463.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SKYZF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to SKYZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PBKOF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 362.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PBKOF trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to PBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs KMBIF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, KMBIF has a market cap of 322.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while KMBIF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas KMBIF's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KMBIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to KMBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EIHDF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EIHDF has a market cap of 309.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EIHDF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EIHDF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EIHDF's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to EIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PDSSF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 304.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PDSSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PDSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs AGTEF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 232.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while AGTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to AGTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PBTHF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PBTHF has a market cap of 230.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PBTHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PBTHF's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PBTHF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PBTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs AINSF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 203.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while AINSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EHGRF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 200.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EHGRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to EHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GHIFF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 164.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GHIFF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GHIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PSDMF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 146.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PSDMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to PSDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs MALDF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 146.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while MALDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MALDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to MALDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs PMKRF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to PMKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs RCTUF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to RCTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ARHN Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ARHN has a market cap of 81.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ARHN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ARHN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARHN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to ARHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GLXZ Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 71.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GLXZ trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -14.80. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs CTTMF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 46.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to CTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs TBTC Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 20.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while TBTC trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to TBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BRRE Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 20.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BRRE trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -850.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to BRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs JKPTF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to JKPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs JPOTF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 13.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while JPOTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs TNTAF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SPOZF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SPOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs NWGIW Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to NWGIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs CETMF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while CETMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to CETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs RYWCF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to RYWCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs RVRVF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 2.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while RVRVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to RVRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs RVLCF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while RVLCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to RVLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs LTFD Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while LTFD trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to LTFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs LUKEF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to LUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ITMZF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs THRSF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while THRSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BRVO Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BRVO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to BRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs GMER Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while GMER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMER's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to GMER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ELRA Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ELRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to ELRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs SWCC Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 758750.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while SWCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to SWCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs BYNEF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 693300.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while BYNEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to BYNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs FUNFF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 539337.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs WNRS Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 225878.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while WNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to WNRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs WPFH Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 128632.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while WPFH trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs VETIF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 101195.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while VETIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +9.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to VETIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EXPH Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 99952.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EXPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to EXPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EMBR Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 32247.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EMBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to EMBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs EPGG Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29800.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while EPGG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to EPGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs NTGL Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18166.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while NTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to NTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ELYS Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 14978.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ELYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to ELYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs KNBA Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 14717.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while KNBA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is less volatile compared to KNBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs CGAM Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2507.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while CGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to CGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ULSP Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 1057.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ULSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to ULSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs ROBK Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while ROBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to ROBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs LTTGF Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to LTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.
FCNE vs AMRA Comparison
FCNE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNE stands at 1.92M. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 33.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCNE is priced at $1.77, while AMRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCNE's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCNE is more volatile compared to AMRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNE.