Funding Circle Holdings plc

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, 0R2Z.L has a market cap of 486.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while 0R2Z.L trades at $344.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas 0R2Z.L's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0R2Z.L's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to 0R2Z.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, GACA.L has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while GACA.L trades at $155.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas GACA.L's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GACA.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to GACA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, GACB.L has a market cap of 25.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while GACB.L trades at $134.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas GACB.L's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GACB.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to GACB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, 0QIG.L has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while 0QIG.L trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas 0QIG.L's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0QIG.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to 0QIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, LENZ.L has a market cap of 645.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while LENZ.L trades at $108.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas LENZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LENZ.L's ROE of +2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to LENZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, PFG.L has a market cap of 571.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while PFG.L trades at $225.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas PFG.L's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to PFG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, IPF.L has a market cap of 323.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while IPF.L trades at $148.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas IPF.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to IPF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, EQLS.L has a market cap of 282.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while EQLS.L trades at $139.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas EQLS.L's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EQLS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to EQLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, HAT.L has a market cap of 198.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while HAT.L trades at $452.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas HAT.L's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to HAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, SUS.L has a market cap of 185.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while SUS.L trades at $1,525.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas SUS.L's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to SUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, VANQ.L has a market cap of 181.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while VANQ.L trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas VANQ.L's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VANQ.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to VANQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, 47IE.L has a market cap of 176.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while 47IE.L trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas 47IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 47IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to 47IE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, ASAI.L has a market cap of 104.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while ASAI.L trades at $104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas ASAI.L's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASAI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to ASAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, APP.L has a market cap of 79.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while APP.L trades at $42.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas APP.L's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to APP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, TRU.L has a market cap of 77.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while TRU.L trades at $73.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas TRU.L's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRU.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to TRU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, LIT.L has a market cap of 65.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while LIT.L trades at $57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas LIT.L's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to LIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, DFCH.L has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while DFCH.L trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas DFCH.L's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DFCH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to DFCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, BFSP.L has a market cap of 60.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while BFSP.L trades at $96.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas BFSP.L's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFSP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to BFSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, TIME.L has a market cap of 51.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while TIME.L trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas TIME.L's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIME.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to TIME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, AWEM.L has a market cap of 42.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while AWEM.L trades at $121.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas AWEM.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AWEM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to AWEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, BANK.L has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while BANK.L trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas BANK.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BANK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to BANK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, CIN.L has a market cap of 11.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while CIN.L trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas CIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIN.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FCH.L has daily volatility of 1.67 and CIN.L has daily volatility of N/A.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, ORCH.L has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while ORCH.L trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas ORCH.L's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORCH.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to ORCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, VCAP.L has a market cap of 4.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while VCAP.L trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas VCAP.L's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VCAP.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to VCAP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, LEND.L has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while LEND.L trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas LEND.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to LEND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, ZAIM.L has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while ZAIM.L trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas ZAIM.L's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZAIM.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to ZAIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, AMGO.L has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while AMGO.L trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas AMGO.L's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMGO.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is less volatile compared to AMGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, NSF.L has a market cap of 274944.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while NSF.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas NSF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSF.L's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to NSF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, PCF.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while PCF.L trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas PCF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCF.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FCH.L has daily volatility of 1.67 and PCF.L has daily volatility of N/A.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, MCL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while MCL.L trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas MCL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCL.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to MCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, 46IE.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while 46IE.L trades at $85.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas 46IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 46IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCH.L is more volatile compared to 46IE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCH.L.

FCH.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCH.L stands at 360.45M. In comparison, TSL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FCH.L is priced at $119.00, while TSL.L trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.86, whereas TSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCH.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSL.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FCH.L has daily volatility of 1.67 and TSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.