FBEC Worldwide, Inc.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 308.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while KO trades at $71.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 180.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PEP trades at $131.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 59.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while MNST trades at $60.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 51.40B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while NNFSF trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 46.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while KDP trades at $34.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CCEP trades at $89.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 18.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CCHBF trades at $51.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 18.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CCHGY trades at $51.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while EMBVF trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and EMBVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 13.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while ITONF trades at $61.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 12.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PRMB trades at $33.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -664.40. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 9.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while COKE trades at $1,135.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CELH trades at $33.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 75.31. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and BTVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while YKLTF trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and YKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while YKLTY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and YKLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while COCSF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and COCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while UPCHY trades at $109.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while FIZZ trades at $43.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PRMW trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and PRMW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and UNPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while AKO-A trades at $19.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while AKO-B trades at $25.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CCOJY trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 126.29. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and CCOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and ITOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while AQPW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while COCO trades at $34.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while KOF trades at $92.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and OSOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while FQVTF trades at $10.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and FQVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while LSDAF trades at $148.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 915.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while YNAJF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and BAGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and NJMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 320.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while OTLY trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 201.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while HAATF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 138.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while ZVIA trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 80.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while REED trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REED's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 46.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BRFH trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 40.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while SHOT trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 28.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while JSDA trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while MOJO trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and MOJO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while KRTL trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while DRNK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while HIRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while FLWBF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.14M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while APRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while NTEI trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and NTEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while INKW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while RVBR trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and PLVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PURT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while RMHB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while ASII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864639.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while ALKM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and ALKM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 739814.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while HSEEF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509782.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while FMBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378382.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while VGID trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 371634.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PDPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and PDPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 348516.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while DNDT trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 262614.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while HFBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245331.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while KGKG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and KGKG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 228374.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while EQLB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 214659.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while WTER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199559.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while FHBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171816.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while DNAX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and DNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155461.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while GHMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHMP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and GHMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25613.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while NBVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBVG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22922.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while STZU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22637.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while KRED trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and KRED have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22350.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while FGFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and FGFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12326.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +11.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and BVNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 9262.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BGEM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 3971.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while TBEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and TBEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1861.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while SWRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and SWRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 1200.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while MLHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and MLHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 1124.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while PPBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1080.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while HKBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while MCHA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and MCHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while BBDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and BBDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while AQUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AQUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while ABVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and ABVG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, GGGRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC and GGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, NBEV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while NBEV trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, RMIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while RMIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.

FBEC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FBEC stands at 1.76M. In comparison, CLCL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, FBEC is priced at $0.00, while CLCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FBEC currently has a P/E ratio of 0.03, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBEC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBEC is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBEC.