Fonciere Atland
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FATL.PA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FATL.PA
Fonciere Atland (FATL.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FATL.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATL.PA | €43.80 | +0.00% | 0 | 9.05 | €4.84 | N/A |
| MRL.LS | €14.24 | +0.00% | 8.8B | 10.17 | €1.40 | +2.61% |
| COV.PA | €53.75 | +0.66% | 6B | 8.11 | €6.63 | +2.79% |
| COFB.BR | €83.90 | +0.66% | 3.2B | -142.20 | -€0.59 | +7.39% |
| ICAD.PA | €20.04 | +0.86% | 1.5B | -12.37 | -€1.62 | +10.73% |
| XIOR.BR | €27.40 | +1.86% | 1.3B | 22.10 | €1.24 | +1.58% |
| INTO.BR | €20.95 | +0.48% | 645.8M | 104.75 | €0.20 | N/A |
| NEXTA.BR | €45.30 | -2.79% | 457.8M | 13.85 | €3.27 | N/A |
| IMDA.PA | €50.80 | +0.00% | 382.9M | 9.81 | €5.18 | +4.09% |
| ATLD.PA | €39.70 | +1.79% | 171.7M | 17.41 | €2.28 | +5.79% |
Stock Comparison
FATL.PA vs MRL.LS Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MRL.LS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while MRL.LS trades at €14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas MRL.LS's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRL.LS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to MRL.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check MRL.LS's competition here
FATL.PA vs COV.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, COV.PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while COV.PA trades at €53.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas COV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COV.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to COV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check COV.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs COFB.BR Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, COFB.BR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while COFB.BR trades at €83.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas COFB.BR's P/E ratio is -142.20. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COFB.BR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to COFB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check COFB.BR's competition here
FATL.PA vs ICAD.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ICAD.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while ICAD.PA trades at €20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas ICAD.PA's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICAD.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to ICAD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check ICAD.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs XIOR.BR Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, XIOR.BR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while XIOR.BR trades at €27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas XIOR.BR's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XIOR.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to XIOR.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check XIOR.BR's competition here
FATL.PA vs INTO.BR Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, INTO.BR has a market cap of 645.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while INTO.BR trades at €20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas INTO.BR's P/E ratio is 104.75. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INTO.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to INTO.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check INTO.BR's competition here
FATL.PA vs NEXTA.BR Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, NEXTA.BR has a market cap of 457.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while NEXTA.BR trades at €45.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas NEXTA.BR's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEXTA.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to NEXTA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check NEXTA.BR's competition here
FATL.PA vs IMDA.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IMDA.PA has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while IMDA.PA trades at €50.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas IMDA.PA's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMDA.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to IMDA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check IMDA.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs ATLD.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ATLD.PA has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while ATLD.PA trades at €39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas ATLD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATLD.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to ATLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check ATLD.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs BLEE.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, BLEE.PA has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while BLEE.PA trades at €125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas BLEE.PA's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLEE.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is more volatile compared to BLEE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check BLEE.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs WEB.BR Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WEB.BR has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while WEB.BR trades at €39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas WEB.BR's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEB.BR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to WEB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check WEB.BR's competition here
FATL.PA vs CBSM.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CBSM.PA has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while CBSM.PA trades at €9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas CBSM.PA's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBSM.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to CBSM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check CBSM.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs MRM.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MRM.PA has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while MRM.PA trades at €35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas MRM.PA's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRM.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is more volatile compared to MRM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check MRM.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs MLIPO.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLIPO.PA has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while MLIPO.PA trades at €18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas MLIPO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLIPO.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to MLIPO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check MLIPO.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs PAR.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PAR.PA has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while PAR.PA trades at €25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas PAR.PA's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAR.PA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to PAR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check PAR.PA's competition here
FATL.PA vs MLBAR.PA Comparison April 2026
FATL.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATL.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLBAR.PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATL.PA is priced at €43.80, while MLBAR.PA trades at €0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.05, whereas MLBAR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATL.PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLBAR.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATL.PA is less volatile compared to MLBAR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATL.PA.Check MLBAR.PA's competition here