Fantasy Aces Daily Fantasy Sports Corp.
Fantasy Aces Daily Fantasy Sports Corp. (FASDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FASDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FASDF | $0.00 | +1900.00% | 840 | N/A | -$0.21 | N/A |
| NETTF | $23.39 | +0.00% | 74.1B | 15.39 | $1.52 | +2.59% |
| NTDOF | $55.22 | -1.92% | 64.6B | 27.06 | $2.05 | +1.53% |
| NTDOY | $13.76 | -1.78% | 64.1B | 27.00 | $0.51 | +1.01% |
| NEXOF | $25.50 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 31.88 | $0.80 | +1.16% |
| KONMY | $59.95 | -0.96% | 16.6B | 29.82 | $2.05 | +0.91% |
| NEXOY | $20.06 | -2.62% | 15.9B | 26.79 | $0.75 | +1.15% |
| BLBLF | $25.58 | +14.30% | 10.7B | 98.38 | $0.26 | N/A |
| CCOEF | $21.00 | +4.74% | 8.8B | 22.34 | $0.94 | +1.34% |
| CCOEY | $10.04 | -1.08% | 8.4B | 21.36 | $0.47 | +1.41% |
Stock Comparison
FASDF vs NETTF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NETTF trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and NETTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NETTF's competition here
FASDF vs NTDOF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NTDOF trades at $55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check NTDOF's competition here
FASDF vs NTDOY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NTDOY trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check NTDOY's competition here
FASDF vs NEXOF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NEXOF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and NEXOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEXOF's competition here
FASDF vs KONMY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while KONMY trades at $59.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check KONMY's competition here
FASDF vs NEXOY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NEXOY trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check NEXOY's competition here
FASDF vs BLBLF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while BLBLF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is 98.38. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and BLBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLBLF's competition here
FASDF vs CCOEF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while CCOEF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and CCOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOEF's competition here
FASDF vs CCOEY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while CCOEY trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check CCOEY's competition here
FASDF vs OTGLF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while OTGLF trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 43.59. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and OTGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTGLF's competition here
FASDF vs OTGLY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while OTGLY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check OTGLY's competition here
FASDF vs SQNNY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SQNNY trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check SQNNY's competition here
FASDF vs SQNXF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SQNXF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SQNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SQNXF's competition here
FASDF vs KSFTF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while KSFTF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and KSFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSFTF's competition here
FASDF vs SGAMF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SGAMF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SGAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGAMF's competition here
FASDF vs SGAMY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SGAMY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check SGAMY's competition here
FASDF vs KYYWF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and KYYWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KYYWF's competition here
FASDF vs DNACF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while DNACF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to DNACF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and DNACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNACF's competition here
FASDF vs MIXIF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while MIXIF trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and MIXIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIXIF's competition here
FASDF vs KYYWY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check KYYWY's competition here
FASDF vs PRXXF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while PRXXF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 104.54. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and PRXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRXXF's competition here
FASDF vs XDNCF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and XDNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XDNCF's competition here
FASDF vs THQQF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while THQQF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to THQQF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and THQQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THQQF's competition here
FASDF vs GUNGF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GUNGF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GUNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUNGF's competition here
FASDF vs RVTTY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and RVTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVTTY's competition here
FASDF vs UBSFF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 642.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while UBSFF trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check UBSFF's competition here
FASDF vs UBSFY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while UBSFY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check UBSFY's competition here
FASDF vs GREZF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 542.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GREZF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GREZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GREZF's competition here
FASDF vs IGGGF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 488.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while IGGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and IGGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGGGF's competition here
FASDF vs BOYAF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while BOYAF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and BOYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOYAF's competition here
FASDF vs SCFR Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SCFR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SCFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCFR's competition here
FASDF vs FRRDF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while FRRDF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and FRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRDF's competition here
FASDF vs STLFF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while STLFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and STLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STLFF's competition here
FASDF vs RMDEF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while RMDEF trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and RMDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMDEF's competition here
FASDF vs AKAFF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and AKAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKAFF's competition here
FASDF vs ENADF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while ENADF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and ENADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENADF's competition here
FASDF vs GBNW Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GBNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBNW's competition here
FASDF vs GENTF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GENTF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GENTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GENTF's competition here
FASDF vs PONGF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while PONGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check PONGF's competition here
FASDF vs VSQTF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while VSQTF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check VSQTF's competition here
FASDF vs POPRF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check POPRF's competition here
FASDF vs FGRTF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and FGRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGRTF's competition here
FASDF vs GAMGF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check GAMGF's competition here
FASDF vs IDGAF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while IDGAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and IDGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDGAF's competition here
FASDF vs EAGRF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while EAGRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and EAGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EAGRF's competition here
FASDF vs SMPBF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SMPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMPBF's competition here
FASDF vs SCTGF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SCTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTGF's competition here
FASDF vs ZUKI Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while ZUKI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check ZUKI's competition here
FASDF vs WIGAF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and WIGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WIGAF's competition here
FASDF vs NVNT Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +5.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and NVNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVNT's competition here
FASDF vs YDRMF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and YDRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YDRMF's competition here
FASDF vs APETF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while APETF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to APETF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and APETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APETF's competition here
FASDF vs GGAMF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GGAMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GGAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGAMF's competition here
FASDF vs SRVTF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SRVTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SRVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRVTF's competition here
FASDF vs PRYNF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and PRYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRYNF's competition here
FASDF vs SWMIF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SWMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWMIF's competition here
FASDF vs BCDMF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 730.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and BCDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCDMF's competition here
FASDF vs IMGX Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and IMGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMGX's competition here
FASDF vs FRZT Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 623K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check FRZT's competition here
FASDF vs ATIG Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 593K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and ATIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATIG's competition here
FASDF vs GMETF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 570.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GMETF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GMETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMETF's competition here
FASDF vs TAPM Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 408.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while TAPM trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check TAPM's competition here
FASDF vs IENT Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and IENT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IENT's competition here
FASDF vs KSMRF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 235.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and KSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSMRF's competition here
FASDF vs EPYFF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 234.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and EPYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPYFF's competition here
FASDF vs WGRFF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 229.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and WGRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WGRFF's competition here
FASDF vs TIIDF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and TIIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIIDF's competition here
FASDF vs PLGC Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check PLGC's competition here
FASDF vs SPYR Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 70.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SPYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPYR's competition here
FASDF vs COUV Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and COUV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COUV's competition here
FASDF vs CLIS Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to CLIS's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check CLIS's competition here
FASDF vs STIE Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 34K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and STIE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STIE's competition here
FASDF vs GMGT Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 27.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and GMGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMGT's competition here
FASDF vs BLITF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 22.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and BLITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLITF's competition here
FASDF vs NTEK Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to NTEK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and NTEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTEK's competition here
FASDF vs LIVC Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and LIVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIVC's competition here
FASDF vs WINRW Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to WINRW's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and WINRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WINRW's competition here
FASDF vs ADTR Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and ADTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTR's competition here
FASDF vs ENDRF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while ENDRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check ENDRF's competition here
FASDF vs AXNVF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and AXNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXNVF's competition here
FASDF vs VRVR Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +7.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and VRVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VRVR's competition here
FASDF vs WINR Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to WINR's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and WINR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WINR's competition here
FASDF vs HTSF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and HTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTSF's competition here
FASDF vs TERA Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and TERA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERA's competition here
FASDF vs BLKCF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and BLKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLKCF's competition here
FASDF vs SPLY Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and SPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPLY's competition here
FASDF vs IPUB Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and IPUB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPUB's competition here
FASDF vs RIVX Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +15.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF and RIVX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIVX's competition here
FASDF vs YVRLF Comparison February 2026
FASDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FASDF stands at 840. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483. Regarding current trading prices, FASDF is priced at $0.00, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FASDF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FASDF's ROE is +17.41%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FASDF is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FASDF.Check YVRLF's competition here